Author Topic: jets vs helicopters  (Read 3620 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Just_A_Guy

  • Guest
  • *
  • 255
  • Rate Post
  • Posts: 13
jets vs helicopters
« on: January 04, 2018, 17:34:15 »
i am deciding whether to do one or the other, please respond with pros and cons
which one makes more of a difference, gets deployed more?
thanks.

Offline FJAG

  • Army.ca Veteran
  • *****
  • 157,245
  • Rate Post
  • Posts: 1,799
  • Ex Gladio Justicia
    • WordPress Page
Re: jets vs helicopters
« Reply #1 on: January 04, 2018, 17:46:04 »
i am deciding whether to do one or the other, please respond with pros and cons
which one makes more of a difference, gets deployed more?
thanks.

Have you given up all your plans about being a "fire support officer" in the artillery?

Before anyone wastes any time responding to you on this it might be an idea if you told us a bit about yourself. I'm starting to have some doubts about you.

 :cheers:
Illegitimi non carborundum
Semper debeatis percutis ictu primo
Access my "Allies" book series at:
https://wolfriedel.wordpress.com

Offline mariomike

  • Directing Staff
  • Army.ca Fixture
  • *
  • 485,345
  • Rate Post
  • Posts: 8,777
    • The job.
Re: jets vs helicopters
« Reply #2 on: January 04, 2018, 18:10:02 »
Have you given up all your plans about being a "fire support officer" in the artillery?

Perhaps so. The OP has started three new Pilot threads today.

Offline Roger123

  • Member
  • ****
  • 3,260
  • Rate Post
  • Posts: 120
Re: jets vs helicopters
« Reply #3 on: January 04, 2018, 19:54:25 »
i am deciding whether to do one or the other, please respond with pros and cons
which one makes more of a difference, gets deployed more?
thanks.
I would suggest revealing a bit of information regarding your self, your situation, place in the application process, etc. Your decision about going jets or helicopters is pretty mute, seeing how that decision is far off into the future, based on the needs of the RCAF and your performance amongst your class,etc, assuming you get through, successfully, the lengthy and extensive pilot application process. You have no input, in an official capacity, with regards to your preferred airframe when you make your pilot application.

Offline Eye In The Sky

  • Army.ca Fixture
  • *****
  • 202,870
  • Rate Post
  • Posts: 8,345
    • VP INTERNATIONAL
Re: jets vs helicopters
« Reply #4 on: January 04, 2018, 22:03:11 »
The correct answer is it depends.   8)
I feel the need...the NEED to FEED! - Prop Gun

Offline Good2Golf

  • Directing Staff
  • Army.ca Legend
  • *
  • 194,655
  • Rate Post
  • Posts: 10,581
  • Dammit! I lost my sand-wedge on that last jump!
Re: jets vs helicopters
« Reply #5 on: January 05, 2018, 01:10:13 »
The correct answer is it depends.   8)

Disagree. 

The real answer is 'yes'.   :nod:

Offline SeaKingTacco

  • Army.ca Fixture
  • *****
  • 135,310
  • Rate Post
  • Posts: 5,053
  • Door Gunnery- The Sport of Kings!
Re: jets vs helicopters
« Reply #6 on: January 05, 2018, 01:56:08 »
You know, helicopters have jet engines, so, does it matter?

Online medicineman

  • Well stuck into my new job and thoroughly enjoying it.
  • Army.ca Fixture
  • *****
  • 142,815
  • Rate Post
  • Posts: 7,086
  • In Arduis Fidelis
    • Fed By The Firehose
Re: jets vs helicopters
« Reply #7 on: January 05, 2018, 08:37:03 »
C17's are jets too...

MM
MM

Remember the basics of Medicine - "Pink is GOOD, Blue is BAD, Air goes in AND out, Blood Goes Round and Round"

I may sound like a pessimist, but I am a realist.

Offline Remius

  • Army.ca Veteran
  • *****
  • 89,350
  • Rate Post
  • Posts: 2,927
Re: jets vs helicopters
« Reply #8 on: January 05, 2018, 09:04:38 »
Jet packs.  Plus they let you get to the coins and life ups on higher levels.
Optio

Offline Oldgateboatdriver

  • Army.ca Veteran
  • *****
  • 130,540
  • Rate Post
  • Posts: 3,453
Re: jets vs helicopters
« Reply #9 on: January 05, 2018, 09:53:34 »
If we are suggesting things with jet engines: What about a frigate or a destroyer?

Offline Remius

  • Army.ca Veteran
  • *****
  • 89,350
  • Rate Post
  • Posts: 2,927
Re: jets vs helicopters
« Reply #10 on: January 05, 2018, 10:23:43 »
If we are suggesting things with jet engines: What about a frigate or a destroyer?

or those hand dryer things in public washrooms...
Optio

Offline Ditch

  • Established 1998
  • Mentor
  • Army.ca Veteran
  • *
  • 27,112
  • Rate Post
  • Posts: 2,371
  • I routinely step in it, but like conflict...
Re: jets vs helicopters
« Reply #11 on: January 05, 2018, 10:37:26 »
Some tanks have jet engines too....  albeit none of ours.
Per Ardua Ad Astra

Offline SupersonicMax

    is back home.

  • Mentor
  • Army.ca Veteran
  • *
  • 79,570
  • Rate Post
  • Posts: 2,742
Re: jets vs helicopters
« Reply #12 on: January 05, 2018, 10:43:03 »
You know, helicopters have jet engines, so, does it matter?

To be accurate, you are referring to Turbine engines.  Jet engines are a subset of turbine engines but turbine engines are not necessarily jet engines. All CAF helicopters are powered by turboshaft engines, a subset of turbine engines.

Jet engines uses the acceleration of the air mass going through the engine to produce thrust.  The difference between the exhaust velocity and the intake velocity is directly proportional to thrust.

In a turboshaft engine (such as those in a helicopter) having any exhaust velocity is a waste of power that could be used to turn the rotor.  Yes, there is residual thrust however, just like you don't consider your car to be powered by a jet engine, turboshaft helicopters aren't considered powered by jet engines. 

But we disgress...
« Last Edit: January 05, 2018, 10:53:15 by SupersonicMax »

Offline Baz

  • Donor
  • Full Member
  • *
  • 13,345
  • Rate Post
  • Posts: 471
Re: jets vs helicopters
« Reply #13 on: January 05, 2018, 10:46:00 »
To be accurate, you are referring to Turbine engines.  Jet engines are a subset of turbine engines but turbine engines are not necessarily jet engines. All CAF helicopters are powered by turboshaft engines, a subset of turbine engines.

And here I though he wanted to make electricity using one of these: http://www.opraturbines.com/en/OPRA-WEB---Products---Products/Mobile-Power/ (it does say "Electricity for military compounds in war zones"), but that would also be a turbine, not a jet.

Offline SeaKingTacco

  • Army.ca Fixture
  • *****
  • 135,310
  • Rate Post
  • Posts: 5,053
  • Door Gunnery- The Sport of Kings!
Re: jets vs helicopters
« Reply #14 on: January 05, 2018, 10:56:29 »
To be accurate, you are referring to Turbine engines.  Jet engines are a subset of turbine engines but turbine engines are not necessarily jet engines. All CAF helicopters are powered by turboshaft engines, a subset of turbine engines.

Jet engines uses the acceleration of the air mass going through the engine to produce thrust.  The difference between the exhaust velocity and the intake velocity is directly proportional to thrust.

In a turboshaft engine (such as those in a helicopter) having any exhaust velocity is a waste of power that could be used to turn the rotor.  Yes, there is residual thrust however, just like you don't consider your car to be powered by a jet engine, turboshaft helicopters aren't considered powered by jet engines. 

But we disgress...

What in the world makes you think accuracy is important in this thread?

Offline Good2Golf

  • Directing Staff
  • Army.ca Legend
  • *
  • 194,655
  • Rate Post
  • Posts: 10,581
  • Dammit! I lost my sand-wedge on that last jump!
Re: jets vs helicopters
« Reply #15 on: January 05, 2018, 15:04:27 »
What in the world makes you think accuracy is important in this thread?

Response-theme mis-read.  Perhaps an OT to INT O is in Max's future?   ;D


Offline Eye In The Sky

  • Army.ca Fixture
  • *****
  • 202,870
  • Rate Post
  • Posts: 8,345
    • VP INTERNATIONAL
Re: jets vs helicopters
« Reply #16 on: January 05, 2018, 15:40:28 »
Disagree. 

The real answer is 'yes'.   :nod:

Damn!  I didn't think of that one!
I feel the need...the NEED to FEED! - Prop Gun

Offline Colin P

  • Army.ca Fixture
  • *****
  • 123,720
  • Rate Post
  • Posts: 8,808
  • Civilian
    • http://www.pacific.ccg-gcc.gc.ca
Re: jets vs helicopters
« Reply #17 on: January 05, 2018, 17:03:58 »
To be accurate, you are referring to Turbine engines.  Jet engines are a subset of turbine engines but turbine engines are not necessarily jet engines. All CAF helicopters are powered by turboshaft engines, a subset of turbine engines.

Jet engines uses the acceleration of the air mass going through the engine to produce thrust.  The difference between the exhaust velocity and the intake velocity is directly proportional to thrust.

In a turboshaft engine (such as those in a helicopter) having any exhaust velocity is a waste of power that could be used to turn the rotor.  Yes, there is residual thrust however, just like you don't consider your car to be powered by a jet engine, turboshaft helicopters aren't considered powered by jet engines. 

But we disgress...

leave it to the british  ;D
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jaguar_C-X75
https://www.livescience.com/49567-rocket-powered-bloodhound-car-photos.html


Online medicineman

  • Well stuck into my new job and thoroughly enjoying it.
  • Army.ca Fixture
  • *****
  • 142,815
  • Rate Post
  • Posts: 7,086
  • In Arduis Fidelis
    • Fed By The Firehose
Re: jets vs helicopters
« Reply #18 on: January 06, 2018, 08:42:50 »
To be accurate, you are referring to Turbine engines.  Jet engines are a subset of turbine engines but turbine engines are not necessarily jet engines. All CAF helicopters are powered by turboshaft engines, a subset of turbine engines.

Jet engines uses the acceleration of the air mass going through the engine to produce thrust.  The difference between the exhaust velocity and the intake velocity is directly proportional to thrust.

In a turboshaft engine (such as those in a helicopter) having any exhaust velocity is a waste of power that could be used to turn the rotor.  Yes, there is residual thrust however, just like you don't consider your car to be powered by a jet engine, turboshaft helicopters aren't considered powered by jet engines. 

But we disgress...

Spoil sport...

MM
MM

Remember the basics of Medicine - "Pink is GOOD, Blue is BAD, Air goes in AND out, Blood Goes Round and Round"

I may sound like a pessimist, but I am a realist.

Offline Good2Golf

  • Directing Staff
  • Army.ca Legend
  • *
  • 194,655
  • Rate Post
  • Posts: 10,581
  • Dammit! I lost my sand-wedge on that last jump!
Re: jets vs helicopters
« Reply #19 on: January 06, 2018, 10:00:58 »
Spoil sport...

MM

And not even accurately spoiling. ;)  Otherwise we would have seen a more accurate breakdown of the turbo machinery by function, including: turbojet, turbofan, geared turbofan, turboprop, ducted turboprop and turboshaft.  No turboshaft engine/system extracts 100% thermodynamic power from the fuel to output at the shaft, there is always unextracted energy in the exhaust, sometimes on the order of 5-10%.  In the case of a large turboshaft engine such as the Honeywell T55-L-714 on the CH-147F Chinook, this can actually approach a quarter ton of thrust (sounds more impressive than 500 lbs) per engine, not an insignificant amount of true jet thrust...exhaust being ejected at much greater speed at the exhaust plane than the air that entered the engine's inlet.  Furthermore, those who were wondering why the Chinook's exhaust is shaped the way it is (a linearized expanding bell), is amongst a number of functions, a divergent nozzle downstream from the power turbine which effectively reduces the overall nozzle pressure ratio - NPR (see NASA's Glen Research Center's information paper on Turbine Nozzle Performance for reference) thereby maximizing the speed increase of the exhaust flow, and associated (residual) thrust of the engine(s).  Interestingly, that puts a CH-147F Chinook's T55 per/engine output at twice the maximum jet thrust as the Microturbo SA (France) TRS-18 turbojet used in the BD-5J micro jet, albeit about 35 times less thrust than a CF-188's GE F404 engine.  Jet thrust is jet thrust, after all.

Now, back to the thread's response theme...should we include additional jet thrust from the helicopter if the crew ate at Taco Bell before the flight?

Offline Nerf herder

  • Directing Staff
  • Army.ca Fixture
  • *
  • 24,281
  • Rate Post
  • Posts: 8,043
  • The usual suspect.
Re: jets vs helicopters
« Reply #20 on: January 06, 2018, 10:03:02 »
Some tanks have jet engines too....  albeit none of ours.

Thank sweet zombie Jeebus....

Regards
Those who beat their swords into plowshares usually end up plowing for those who kept their swords.--Ben Franklin

"Going to war without France is like going deer hunting without your accordion."
    -Norman Schwartzkopf

Offline dapaterson

    - a scruffy-looking nerf herder.

  • Army.ca Subscriber
  • Army.ca Myth
  • *
  • 424,180
  • Rate Post
  • Posts: 15,973
Re: jets vs helicopters
« Reply #21 on: January 06, 2018, 10:06:45 »
should we include additional jet thrust from the helicopter if the crew ate at Taco Bell before the flight?

Friends don't let friends eat at Taco Bell.
This posting made in accordance with the Charter of Rights and Freedoms, section 2(b):
Everyone has the following fundamental freedoms: freedom of thought, belief, opinion and expression, including freedom of the press and other media of communication
http://laws.justice.gc.ca/en/charter/1.html

Online medicineman

  • Well stuck into my new job and thoroughly enjoying it.
  • Army.ca Fixture
  • *****
  • 142,815
  • Rate Post
  • Posts: 7,086
  • In Arduis Fidelis
    • Fed By The Firehose
Re: jets vs helicopters
« Reply #22 on: January 06, 2018, 13:31:34 »


Now, back to the thread's response theme...should we include additional jet thrust from the helicopter if the crew ate at Taco Bell before the flight?

Taco Bell = Taco Smell

MM


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
MM

Remember the basics of Medicine - "Pink is GOOD, Blue is BAD, Air goes in AND out, Blood Goes Round and Round"

I may sound like a pessimist, but I am a realist.

Offline Dimsum

    West coast best coast.

  • Mentor
  • Army.ca Veteran
  • *
  • 156,070
  • Rate Post
  • Posts: 4,613
  • I get paid to travel. I just don't pick where.
Re: jets vs helicopters
« Reply #23 on: January 06, 2018, 14:29:23 »

Now, back to the thread's response theme...should we include additional jet thrust from the helicopter if the crew ate at Taco Bell before the flight?

At least you can open the cabin and rear doors in a helicopter, to either a) quickly ventilate the cabin and/or b) throw the offender out.
Philip II of Macedon to Spartans (346 BC):  "You are advised to submit without further delay, for if I bring my army into your land, I will destroy your farms, slay your people, and raze your city."

Reply:  "If."