Author Topic: Alleged PMO obstruction in SNC Lavalin case  (Read 53712 times)

0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline Hamish Seggie

  • Army.ca Legend
  • *****
  • 220,952
  • Rate Post
  • Posts: 10,129
  • This is my son Michael, KIA Afghanistan 3 Sep 08
Re: Alleged PMO obstruction in SNC Lavalin case
« Reply #25 on: February 10, 2019, 11:25:38 »
A week is a long time in politics.
Freedom Isn't Free   "Never Shall I Fail My Brothers"

“Do everything that is necessary and nothing that is not".

Offline Chris Pook

  • Army.ca Subscriber
  • Army.ca Legend
  • *
  • 205,505
  • Rate Post
  • Posts: 12,662
  • Wha daur say Mass in ma lug!
Re: Alleged PMO obstruction in SNC Lavalin case
« Reply #26 on: February 10, 2019, 11:46:30 »
I'm curious why we don't see in Canadian politics more caucus revolts like our Australian friends. Our political party leaders being elected from the general membership and then the caucus gets stuck with maybe an inferior "boss" and PMO. Party discipline just seems extremely strong here even at the expense of future party success. I can see the Liberal party being reduced to a minority in the next election as some of the mushy movable vote switching back to the Conservatives plus the youth vote might not come out as strong with pot already legal

I wonder if Canada hasn't been "leading" the Commonwealth in Party Politics while Australia has been "clinging" to the older traditions of Westminster.  In Britain it is only now that Westminster is fully confronting the difference between a Parliamentary Party and an Extra-Parliamentary Party.

The Liberals and Conservatives in Britain were both essentially Parliamentary Parties with the members being "democratically" elected by extra-parliamentary supporters and then being allowed by those supporters to freely and independently elect their own leaders in the House.

Labour has always been different because it was an extra-parliamentary party whose battle-cry was, to paraphrase Preston Manning, "the workers want in"; the god-fearing, nationalist, monarchy supporting members of the Co-Op movements, the Masons and the Unions.

That has always produced a tension between the Parliamentary Party, forced to abide by the traditions of the House, and the Extra-Parliamentary Party, demanding that their voices be heard, and their opinions directly reflected, in the House.

Up until Tony Blair the balance favoured the traditions of the House.  But Tony blew up the House and his own Labour Party and shifted the balance to the Extra-Parliamentary Party which has resulted in Jeremy Corbyn drawing his legitimacy from fee paying party members while being despised by the Parliamentary Party and considered, at best, dubious by voters who have traditionally elected Labour MPs.

The Conservative Party in the UK is facing the same problem of managing its fee paying members, its MPs and the voting public.

I suggest that in Canada, that Extra-Parliamentary Party element predates that of Britain and finds its original expression in The Family Compact and the Chateau Clique - now commonly known as the Laurentian Elite.  People who have grown up in the shade of Scots Episcopalian Bishop Strachan and the Bishops of Quebec - people who disagreed vehemently on Religion but ultimately agreed on the need for a directed, ordered, top-down, corporatist society to deliver Peace, Order and Good Governance.  In Canada they could exert an influence over a small population that their brothers and cousins in Britain were denied.

Britain is, in many ways, especially since joining the EU, "catching up" to Canada, by abandoning its free-booting liberal past to join the corporatist model prevalent in the EU and Canada.

The difference between Canada and Australia is, I think, bred in the bone.  We got the good kids that sat at the front of the class.  The Aussies got the kids that sat at the back, were regularly suspended, occasionally expelled and didn't give  a toss for rules and elites.

In Canada the closest we came to "radicals" were William Lyon MacKenzie and George Brown.  Interestingly it took Mackenzie's grandson, MacKenzie King to create the modern Liberal Party of Canada which put a radical veneer on a corporatist party centred on Montreal's Golden Square Mile - which married Scots businessmen with the Ancien Regime Seigneury.  That union found its ultimate expression in Pierre Elliott Trudeau (Scots mother, French father).  Curiously Justin is a Scots-French mix as well - Margaret Sinclair's father, a Liberal from Vancouver, was born in Scotland.

Our governing system looks more like what the EU aspires to - where most of the moves are made off the chess board of the House. 

The EU is holding up the current open debate in Britain about Brexit, and the involvement of the people, the courts, the press and parliament, as an example of the chaos that results from democracy and is to be avoided at all costs. 








"Wyrd bið ful aræd"

Offline Colin P

  • Army.ca Fixture
  • *****
  • 139,935
  • Rate Post
  • Posts: 9,356
  • Civilian
    • http://www.pacific.ccg-gcc.gc.ca
Re: Alleged PMO obstruction in SNC Lavalin case
« Reply #27 on: February 11, 2019, 12:40:12 »
Our system is becoming mostly a 1 person dictatorship for 4 years with the PMO running everything, I like to see the majority party MP's have more power over the PM.

Offline Target Up

    ........pull, patch, and score.

  • Army.ca Subscriber
  • Army.ca Fixture
  • *
  • 222,320
  • Rate Post
  • Posts: 5,819
  • that's how we roll in redneck land
Re: Alleged PMO obstruction in SNC Lavalin case
« Reply #28 on: February 11, 2019, 13:13:20 »
Regrettably, I suspect that some people are rubbing their hands too gleefully, ignoring Canadian's disinterest in most things political … except for some niche groups with a personal interest -- pipelines, defence procurement, aboriginal apologies, etc;  governmental ethics doesn't seem to have a strong constituency. 

I'd be surprised if this doesn't become a forgotten tempest in a teapot to all except for some diminishingly reported upon Opposition politicians.  Your average Canadian will once again be transfixed by the latest 'roll up the rim.'

Sad, but my  :2c: nonetheless.

Any day now we'll get a "but Scheer hates the gay abortionists" tweet from someone high up in the gov, and SNC will quietly slip below the horizon.
Apparently, a "USUAL SUSPECT"

“In peace there's nothing so becomes a man as modest stillness and humility; but when the blast of war blows in our ears, then imitate the action of the tiger; stiffen the sinews, summon up the blood, disguise fair nature with hard-favor'd rage.”

 Every normal man must be tempted at times to spit on his hands, hoist the black flag, and start slitting throats

Offline Remius

  • Army.ca Veteran
  • *****
  • 107,495
  • Rate Post
  • Posts: 3,237
Re: Alleged PMO obstruction in SNC Lavalin case
« Reply #29 on: February 11, 2019, 15:36:34 »
Any day now we'll get a "but Scheer hates the gay abortionists" tweet from someone high up in the gov, and SNC will quietly slip below the horizon.

TBH if history is any indicator we'll have the CPC step on its own d**k and the channel will change.
Optio

Offline Target Up

    ........pull, patch, and score.

  • Army.ca Subscriber
  • Army.ca Fixture
  • *
  • 222,320
  • Rate Post
  • Posts: 5,819
  • that's how we roll in redneck land
Apparently, a "USUAL SUSPECT"

“In peace there's nothing so becomes a man as modest stillness and humility; but when the blast of war blows in our ears, then imitate the action of the tiger; stiffen the sinews, summon up the blood, disguise fair nature with hard-favor'd rage.”

 Every normal man must be tempted at times to spit on his hands, hoist the black flag, and start slitting throats

Offline dapaterson

    Mostly Harmless.

  • Army.ca Subscriber
  • Army.ca Myth
  • *
  • 448,250
  • Rate Post
  • Posts: 16,441
Re: Alleged PMO obstruction in SNC Lavalin case
« Reply #31 on: February 11, 2019, 16:43:23 »
TBH if history is any indicator we'll have the CPC step on its own d**k and the channel will change.

You mean like the article on the weekend stating that Scheer has also gone to chat with SNC about their prosecution?

https://www.thestar.com/news/canada/2019/02/10/tory-leader-andrew-scheer-met-with-snc-chief-to-discuss-criminal-charges.html

Quote
Conservative Leader Andrew Scheer met with the head of SNC-Lavalin in May 2018 to discuss criminal charges facing the Quebec construction giant.

Scheer’s office confirmed the Conservative leader discussed the “deferred prosecution agreement” sought by SNC-Lavalin to avoid criminal fraud and corruption charges. The meeting with SNC-Lavalin CEO Neil Bruce took place last May 29, months after the Liberal government introduced so-called “DPAs” in its omnibus budget bill.
This posting made in accordance with the Charter of Rights and Freedoms, section 2(b):
Everyone has the following fundamental freedoms: freedom of thought, belief, opinion and expression, including freedom of the press and other media of communication
http://laws.justice.gc.ca/en/charter/1.html

Offline PuckChaser

  • Directing Staff
  • Army.ca Fixture
  • *
  • 919,220
  • Rate Post
  • Posts: 8,163
    • Peacekeeper's Homepage
Re: Alleged PMO obstruction in SNC Lavalin case
« Reply #32 on: February 11, 2019, 16:57:53 »
You mean like the article on the weekend stating that Scheer has also gone to chat with SNC about their prosecution?

https://www.thestar.com/news/canada/2019/02/10/tory-leader-andrew-scheer-met-with-snc-chief-to-discuss-criminal-charges.html

If that article isn't evidence of the media desperately trying to help the Liberals, I don't know what is. Scheer didn't hide a provision in an omnibus budget (that he campaigned on not using), and then allegedly fire his AG after trying to pressure her to use that provision illegally to help a company that funneled $100K in illegal donations to his party to help his election.  :facepalm:

Offline Infanteer

  • Directing Staff
  • Army.ca Myth
  • *
  • 169,715
  • Rate Post
  • Posts: 15,196
  • Honey Badger FTW!
Re: Alleged PMO obstruction in SNC Lavalin case
« Reply #33 on: February 11, 2019, 18:21:21 »
If that article isn't evidence of the media desperately trying to help the Liberals, I don't know what is.

Well, you are looking at the Star.  Go the National Post, and the pitchforks are out.
"Overall it appears that much of the apparent complexity of modern war stems in practice from the self-imposed complexity of modern HQs" LCol J.P. Storr

Offline Chief Engineer

  • Army.ca Subscriber
  • Army.ca Veteran
  • *
  • 741,067
  • Rate Post
  • Posts: 1,976
Re: Alleged PMO obstruction in SNC Lavalin case
« Reply #34 on: February 11, 2019, 20:34:48 »
If that article isn't evidence of the media desperately trying to help the Liberals, I don't know what is. Scheer didn't hide a provision in an omnibus budget (that he campaigned on not using), and then allegedly fire his AG after trying to pressure her to use that provision illegally to help a company that funneled $100K in illegal donations to his party to help his election.  :facepalm:

Now if that reporter just comes forward and recounts what really happened during that interview that would be a cherry on the top.
"When your draught exceeds your depth, you are most assuredly aground"

All opinions stated are not official policy of the CF and of a private individual

كافر

Offline ballz

    ...

  • Army.ca Subscriber
  • Army.ca Veteran
  • *
  • 118,056
  • Rate Post
  • Posts: 2,270
Re: Alleged PMO obstruction in SNC Lavalin case
« Reply #35 on: February 11, 2019, 21:02:46 »
I'm starting to the think the Liberals know they can do whatever they want and they'll be making no apologies about it...
Have you ever danced with the devil in the pale moonlight?

Offline PuckChaser

  • Directing Staff
  • Army.ca Fixture
  • *
  • 919,220
  • Rate Post
  • Posts: 8,163
    • Peacekeeper's Homepage
Re: Alleged PMO obstruction in SNC Lavalin case
« Reply #36 on: February 11, 2019, 21:39:32 »
Split this stuff into its own topic, as I'm sure the approval ratings thread will get more bumps as we get closer to the election cycle.

Offline Rifleman62

    Retired.

  • Army.ca Subscriber
  • Army.ca Veteran
  • *
  • 97,780
  • Rate Post
  • Posts: 3,148
Re: Alleged PMO obstruction in SNC Lavalin case
« Reply #37 on: February 12, 2019, 07:45:21 »
Quote
Quote from: PuckChaser on Yesterday at 15:57:53
If that article isn't evidence of the media desperately trying to help the Liberals, I don't know what is. Scheer didn't hide a provision in an omnibus budget (that he campaigned on not using), and then allegedly fire his AG after trying to pressure her to use that provision illegally to help a company that funneled $100K in illegal donations to his party to help his election.
 

The Bill was a Finance Minister bill, not Justice. More than enough to be suspicions why the Criminal Code change was "hidden" inside the omnibus budget bill.

This was a strategic move by the Liberals. The amendment to the CC took months to conceive, write and pass through Parliament. If there was no change to the CC, there was no reason to supposedly lobby the Justice Minister.
« Last Edit: February 12, 2019, 10:22:18 by Rifleman62 »
Never Congratulate Yourself In Victory, Nor Blame Your Horses In Defeat - Old Cossack Expression

Offline Rifleman62

    Retired.

  • Army.ca Subscriber
  • Army.ca Veteran
  • *
  • 97,780
  • Rate Post
  • Posts: 3,148
Re: Alleged PMO obstruction in SNC Lavalin case
« Reply #38 on: February 12, 2019, 10:27:17 »
http://nationalpost.pressreader.com/national-post-latest-edition/20190212/textview

Still waiting for clear denials - National Post - 12 Feb 19 - ANDREW COYNE - Comment

It has been four days now since it was reported that officials in the Prime Minister’s Office had pressured the former attorney-general, Jody Wilson-Raybould, to have fraud and corruption charges dropped against SNC-Lavalin, the Quebec engineering and construction giant, and we have yet to hear a direct, on-the-record denial of the allegations by either side.

We’ve had Justin Trudeau’s initial, lawyerly statement to the effect that he did not “direct” Wilson-Raybould to do anything — which was not the allegation — and we’ve had Wilson-Raybould’s repeated claim that “solicitor-client privilege” prevented her from commenting — which legal scholars dispute — and now we have the prime minister’s assertion that Wilson-Raybould lately “confirmed” for him a conversation they had last fall “where I told her directly that any decisions on matters involving the director of public prosecutions were hers alone.” That odd, selective, onesided recounting of what she allegedly said about what he allegedly said that shouldn’t have needed saying in the first place is the closest we’ve got in four days to a straight answer. But while all this line-testing, story-straightening and general dodging about was going on in public, the prime minister’s people were speaking quite freely — off the record.

Why yes, of course there had been “discussions” with Wilson-Raybould about whether to set aside the charges against SNC-Lavalin, senior government officials confided to reporters, in favour of a newly created process called a “remediation agreement.” Indeed, they told Canadian Press the government “would have failed in its duty” if it had not had such discussions “given that a prosecution could bankrupt the company and put thousands of Canadians out of work.” There might have been a “vigorous debate” or even a “robust discussion,” senior government officials acknowledged to the Globe and Mail, but that should not be confused with “an effort to put pressure on Ms. Wilson-Raybould.” How did she get that idea, then, as multiple sources told the paper four days earlier? Was she confused?

Well, unnamed “insiders” volunteered to CP, she was “difficult to get along with,” and had “always sort of been in it for herself.” But not to worry, a Toronto Star columnist reported: the prime minister “still has confidence” in her, notwithstanding the “damage” she was doing to the government “by allowing the speculation about alleged corruption to hang out there.” Beautiful. The PM’s spin doctors have managed to turn a story about their own alleged attempts to interfere in the prosecution of a Liberal-friendly firm (from 1993 to 2003 SNC-Lavalin contributed over a half a million dollars to the party, Elections Canada records show, plus another hundred thousand and change in illegal donations, as the company has acknowledged, in 2004-2011) into a story about whether a “difficult” minister was harming the government with her silence.

Very well. Let’s take the government’s emerging defence on its merits. Is this all perfectly normal? Is it quite all right, first, for a government to want to spare a corporation from criminal charges because it might go out of business? Let’s be clear: this would not be an issue if the corporation employed nine people, rather than nine thousand. The argument — the official story, that is, never mind questions of political connections or how it would all play in Quebec — is that SNC-Lavalin deserves preferential treatment because it is so big: because of the “thousands of jobs” that would allegedly be lost if it were to be submitted to the ordinary processes of law. As an argument for two-tiered justice, this at least has the virtue of being frank.

The company claims it should be spared prosecution because it has changed personnel and overhauled its corporate culture since the days when it was notorious for bribing public officials to win contracts, around the world and in Canada. But it’s surely worth noting that it was under the bad old corporate culture that the company grew into the colossus it is today. The practices for which it now asks to avoid charges, on the grounds that it is too big to fail, are the very sorts of practices that helped make it so big. Is there a more literal application of the old joke about the kid who kills his parents, then asks for leniency on the grounds that he’s an orphan?

I don’t want to be too firm on this point. Maybe there’s a case for remediation agreements of this kind, in principle — after all, the United States and Britain have them. But there’s a context here that can’t be ignored. The only reason the provision is on the books in Canada is because of a concerted public relations campaign on the part of SNC-Lavalin. Charged with fraud and corruption in 2015, the company reacted, not in the usual way, by fighting it in court or bargaining with prosecutors, but by lobbying politicians and their staff.

And it worked: the government custom-drafted the legislation to the designs of a company that was at that moment facing criminal charges, then smuggled it into law via the 2018 omnibus budget bill, of all things. And, when the director of public prosecutions, as is her right, declined to make use of the new provision, preferring to proceed in the old-fashioned way, the prime minister’s office allegedly leaned on the attorney general to overrule her.

To be sure, there is nothing illegal or unethical for the attorney general, as a government background document notes, “to consult with cabinet colleagues before exercising his or her powers.” But that is not what is alleged. Whether or not the line was crossed into “pressure,” the alleged conversation was not with her fellow ministers — her equals — but with political staff in the Prime Minister’s Office, the most powerful people in the country. Next to the prime minister, of course.

That at any rate is the allegation. It has still not been properly denied. It would seem worth investigating why.
Never Congratulate Yourself In Victory, Nor Blame Your Horses In Defeat - Old Cossack Expression

Offline Brihard

  • Army.ca Veteran
  • *****
  • 205,125
  • Rate Post
  • Posts: 4,479
  • Non-Electric Pop-Up Target
Re: Alleged PMO obstruction in SNC Lavalin case
« Reply #39 on: February 12, 2019, 11:44:19 »
Just breaking now- Jody Wilson-Raybould has resigned from cabinet. This is about to get very interesting...
Pacificsm is doctrine fostered by a delusional minority and by the media, which holds forth the proposition it is entirely possible to pick up a turd by the clean end.

Offline Remius

  • Army.ca Veteran
  • *****
  • 107,495
  • Rate Post
  • Posts: 3,237
Re: Alleged PMO obstruction in SNC Lavalin case
« Reply #40 on: February 12, 2019, 11:49:22 »
No kidding.  Not a good start to an election year lol.
Optio

Offline Brihard

  • Army.ca Veteran
  • *****
  • 205,125
  • Rate Post
  • Posts: 4,479
  • Non-Electric Pop-Up Target
Re: Alleged PMO obstruction in SNC Lavalin case
« Reply #41 on: February 12, 2019, 11:50:41 »
She has also retained counsel for advice on what she can and can talk about, so it looks like she intends to once her ducks are in a row. The lawyer's no slouch, either- eight years as a Supreme Court justice. Get your popcorn out, kids.
Pacificsm is doctrine fostered by a delusional minority and by the media, which holds forth the proposition it is entirely possible to pick up a turd by the clean end.

Offline Fishbone Jones

    MSC -5620.

  • "Some people will only like you if you fit inside their box. Don't be afraid to shove that box up their ass."
  • Army.ca Subscriber
  • Army.ca Myth
  • *
  • 276,762
  • Rate Post
  • Posts: 18,579
    • Army.ca
Re: Alleged PMO obstruction in SNC Lavalin case
« Reply #42 on: February 12, 2019, 11:54:47 »
https://www.ctvnews.ca/politics/jody-wilson-raybould-resigns-from-trudeau-cabinet-1.4293529
Quote
OTTAWA – Minister Jody Wilson-Raybould has resigned from Prime Minister Justin Trudeau’s cabinet.

This comes amid ongoing questions about into whether Trudeau or anyone in his office tried to have Wilson-Raybould abandon the prosecution of a case against SNC-Lavalin when she was justice minister and attorney general.

Prime Minister Justin Trudeau has called an emergency cabinet meeting for Tuesday morning, though most ministers are in their ridings or fanned out across the country, so many will be teleconferencing in and not all together around the cabinet table in Ottawa.

I'm guessing it's over SNC. Is she trying to create space between herself and the PMO?

More here: https://www.hilltimes.com/2019/02/11/pmo-interference-working-title/187968
« Last Edit: February 12, 2019, 12:01:05 by Fishbone Jones »
Corruption in politics doesn't scare me.
What scares me is how comfortable people are doing nothing about it.

Online milnews.ca

  • Info Curator, Baker & Food Slut
  • Directing Staff
  • Army.ca Relic
  • *
  • 414,045
  • Rate Post
  • Posts: 21,842
    • MILNEWS.ca-Military News for Canadians
Re: Alleged PMO obstruction in SNC Lavalin case
« Reply #43 on: February 12, 2019, 11:55:43 »
Just breaking now- Jody Wilson-Raybould has resigned from cabinet. This is about to get very interesting...
She has also retained counsel for advice on what she can and can talk about, so it looks like she intends to once her ducks are in a row. The lawyer's no slouch, either- eight years as a Supreme Court justice. Get your popcorn out, kids.
Good catch -- here's her letter (source).
:pop: indeed ...
« Last Edit: March 06, 2019, 15:13:14 by milnews.ca »
“The risk of insult is the price of clarity.” -- Roy H. Williams

The words I share here are my own, not those of anyone else or anybody I may be affiliated with.

Tony Prudori
MILNEWS.ca - Twitter

Offline Bruce Monkhouse

    Is a pinball wizard.

  • Lab Experiment #13
  • Army.ca Subscriber
  • Army.ca Legend
  • *
  • 246,195
  • Rate Post
  • Posts: 14,871
  • WHERE IS MY BATON?
    • http://www.canadianbands.com./home.html
Re: Alleged PMO obstruction in SNC Lavalin case
« Reply #44 on: February 12, 2019, 12:03:30 »
Can you imagine the tension in both Parties war rooms right now?  Will she, won't she....happened, didn't happen,... scream to the press, ask to respect her privacy?  Popcorn  time is right....
IF YOU REALLY ENJOY THIS SITE AND WISH TO CONTINUE,THEN PLEASE WIGGLE UP TO THE BAR AND BUY A SUBSCRIPTION OR SOME SWAG FROM THE MILNET.CA STORE OR IF YOU WISH TO ADVERTISE PLEASE SEND MIKE SOME DETAILS.

Everybody has a game plan until they get punched in the mouth.

Offline meni0n

  • Sr. Member
  • *****
  • 21,595
  • Rate Post
  • Posts: 884
  • Soldier of leisure
Re: Alleged PMO obstruction in SNC Lavalin case
« Reply #45 on: February 12, 2019, 12:41:31 »
Talk about shooting yourself in the foot in front of the Chinese. Imagine what kind of optics this is projecting internationally.

Offline Navy_Pete

  • Army.ca Subscriber
  • Sr. Member
  • *
  • 24,205
  • Rate Post
  • Posts: 746
Re: Alleged PMO obstruction in SNC Lavalin case
« Reply #46 on: February 12, 2019, 12:54:38 »
She has also retained counsel for advice on what she can and can talk about, so it looks like she intends to once her ducks are in a row. The lawyer's no slouch, either- eight years as a Supreme Court justice. Get your popcorn out, kids.

I hear it's a good sign when your former lawyer gets a heavy hitting lawyer for advice on what to do with you....  :pop: :pop: :pop:

Offline Cloud Cover

  • Army.ca Veteran
  • *****
  • 37,060
  • Rate Post
  • Posts: 4,026
Re: Alleged PMO obstruction in SNC Lavalin case
« Reply #47 on: February 12, 2019, 13:14:22 »
Is she going to be the Michael Cohen of the North?  Time for the PMO to start tweeting "Fake News" and have some Make Corruption Great Again hats.
Living the lean life.

Offline Bruce Monkhouse

    Is a pinball wizard.

  • Lab Experiment #13
  • Army.ca Subscriber
  • Army.ca Legend
  • *
  • 246,195
  • Rate Post
  • Posts: 14,871
  • WHERE IS MY BATON?
    • http://www.canadianbands.com./home.html
Re: Alleged PMO obstruction in SNC Lavalin case
« Reply #48 on: February 12, 2019, 13:17:03 »
Is she going to be the Michael Cohen of the North?  Time for the PMO to start tweeting "Fake News" and have some Make Corruption Great Again hats.
:rofl: :rofl:
And nothing but net for the win!!! ;D
IF YOU REALLY ENJOY THIS SITE AND WISH TO CONTINUE,THEN PLEASE WIGGLE UP TO THE BAR AND BUY A SUBSCRIPTION OR SOME SWAG FROM THE MILNET.CA STORE OR IF YOU WISH TO ADVERTISE PLEASE SEND MIKE SOME DETAILS.

Everybody has a game plan until they get punched in the mouth.

Offline Brihard

  • Army.ca Veteran
  • *****
  • 205,125
  • Rate Post
  • Posts: 4,479
  • Non-Electric Pop-Up Target
Re: Alleged PMO obstruction in SNC Lavalin case
« Reply #49 on: February 12, 2019, 13:26:21 »
Is she going to be the Michael Cohen of the North?  Time for the PMO to start tweeting "Fake News" and have some Make Corruption Great Again hats.

No. She will speak to this issue enough of what she can speak about to preserve her own integrity, to cement her reputation as a straight shooter, and also to show that she still possesses enough discretion and good sense to be very valuable to the CPC. She's not going to burn down the house on the way out because that impacts the CPC's risk calculation if they bring her onboard. She will cover her own butt, and more pointedly will not cover PMJT's.
Pacificsm is doctrine fostered by a delusional minority and by the media, which holds forth the proposition it is entirely possible to pick up a turd by the clean end.