Author Topic: Alleged PMO obstruction in SNC Lavalin case  (Read 95453 times)

0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline Brad Sallows

  • Army.ca Veteran
  • *****
  • 74,345
  • Rate Post
  • Posts: 3,951
Re: Alleged PMO obstruction in SNC Lavalin case
« Reply #1075 on: August 26, 2019, 18:53:40 »
>Now maybe there is no such thing as “ executive power by custom”

There is plenty of "customary" government in Canada.

The thing about custom is that it is mutable.
That which does not kill me has made a grave tactical error.

"It is a damned heavy blow; but whining don't help."

Despair is a sin.

Offline Rocky Mountains

  • Full Member
  • *****
  • 4,975
  • Rate Post
  • Posts: 308
Re: Alleged PMO obstruction in SNC Lavalin case
« Reply #1076 on: September 03, 2019, 15:31:43 »
The thing about custom is that it is mutable.

You'd have to ask the Supreme Court about that one.  Which way is the wind blowing today?  From the left?  I look upon the courts as being as political as the legislators.

Offline MilEME09

  • Army.ca Veteran
  • *****
  • 38,675
  • Rate Post
  • Posts: 1,678
"We are called a Battalion, Authorized to be company strength, parade as a platoon, Operating as a section"

Offline SeaKingTacco

  • Army.ca Fixture
  • *****
  • 155,755
  • Rate Post
  • Posts: 5,542
  • Door Gunnery- The Sport of Kings!
Re: Alleged PMO obstruction in SNC Lavalin case
« Reply #1078 on: September 11, 2019, 09:46:38 »
Well, ain't that convenient....

Offline milnews.ca

  • Info Curator, Baker & Food Slut
  • Directing Staff
  • Army.ca Relic
  • *
  • 441,530
  • Rate Post
  • Posts: 22,508
    • MILNEWS.ca-Military News for Canadians
Re: Alleged PMO obstruction in SNC Lavalin case
« Reply #1079 on: September 11, 2019, 10:16:11 »
Indeed ...
“The risk of insult is the price of clarity.” -- Roy H. Williams

The words I share here are my own, not those of anyone else or anybody I may be affiliated with.

Tony Prudori
MILNEWS.ca - Twitter

Offline Chris Pook

  • Army.ca Subscriber
  • Army.ca Legend
  • *
  • 210,155
  • Rate Post
  • Posts: 12,813
  • Wha daur say Mass in ma lug!
Re: Alleged PMO obstruction in SNC Lavalin case
« Reply #1080 on: September 11, 2019, 17:59:13 »

The thing about custom is that it is mutable.

As John Bercow and the British Parliament are demonstrating.  They started off playing soccer and now they are playing Aussie Rules.

And as to Cabinet Confidentiality - look into the Prorogation discussion and whether or not special advisors's emails are confidential.

Nothing is what it was anymore.  And I miss it.  Time to retire to the pub.
« Last Edit: September 11, 2019, 18:02:47 by Chris Pook »
"Wyrd bið ful aræd"

"If change isn’t allowed to be a process, it becomes an event." - Penny Mordaunt 10/10/2019

Offline Haggis

  • "There ain't no hat badge on a helmet!"
  • Army.ca Veteran
  • *****
  • 68,440
  • Rate Post
  • Posts: 2,848
  • "Oh, what a glorious sight, Warm-reekin, rich!"
Re: Alleged PMO obstruction in SNC Lavalin case
« Reply #1081 on: September 12, 2019, 10:20:51 »
Robert Fife breaks down the impact and historical exceptions to Cabinet confidences here
Train like your life depends on it.  Some day, it may.

Offline George Wallace

  • Army.ca Fossil
  • *****
  • 436,780
  • Rate Post
  • Posts: 31,597
  • Crewman
Re: Alleged PMO obstruction in SNC Lavalin case
« Reply #1082 on: September 12, 2019, 10:30:58 »
Would the Obstruction of Justice in investigating an Obstruction of Justice be considered a DOUBLE NEGATIVE = A POSITIVE......ie. It is positive proof that Justin is guilty?

 :whistle:
DISCLAIMER: The opinions and arguments of George Wallace posted on this Site are solely those of George Wallace and not the opinion of Army.ca and are posted for information purposes only.
Unless so stated, they are reflective of my opinion -- and my opinion only, a right that I enjoy along with every other Canadian citizen.

Offline George Wallace

  • Army.ca Fossil
  • *****
  • 436,780
  • Rate Post
  • Posts: 31,597
  • Crewman
Re: Alleged PMO obstruction in SNC Lavalin case
« Reply #1083 on: September 12, 2019, 10:32:10 »
I know Justin "experiences 'transparency' differently" than the rest of us Canadians.
DISCLAIMER: The opinions and arguments of George Wallace posted on this Site are solely those of George Wallace and not the opinion of Army.ca and are posted for information purposes only.
Unless so stated, they are reflective of my opinion -- and my opinion only, a right that I enjoy along with every other Canadian citizen.

Offline RomeoJuliet

  • Donor
  • Sr. Member
  • *
  • 11,845
  • Rate Post
  • Posts: 516
Re: Alleged PMO obstruction in SNC Lavalin case
« Reply #1084 on: September 12, 2019, 10:43:11 »
I know Justin "experiences 'transparency' differently" than the rest of us Canadians.
Writ dropped. HERE COMES GW!


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Offline Sprinting Thistle

  • Member
  • ****
  • 5,720
  • Rate Post
  • Posts: 102
Re: Alleged PMO obstruction in SNC Lavalin case
« Reply #1085 on: September 12, 2019, 11:50:11 »
Would the Obstruction of Justice in investigating an Obstruction of Justice be considered a DOUBLE NEGATIVE = A POSITIVE......ie. It is positive proof that Justin is guilty?

 :whistle:

In the words a famous and wise philosopher who knows all about scandals, "A proof is a proof. What kind of a proof? It's a proof. A proof is a proof. And when you have a good proof, it's because it's proven." :whistle:

Offline Haggis

  • "There ain't no hat badge on a helmet!"
  • Army.ca Veteran
  • *****
  • 68,440
  • Rate Post
  • Posts: 2,848
  • "Oh, what a glorious sight, Warm-reekin, rich!"
Re: Alleged PMO obstruction in SNC Lavalin case
« Reply #1086 on: September 12, 2019, 13:39:24 »
"A proof is a proof. What kind of a proof? It's a proof. A proof is a proof. And when you have a good proof, it's because it's proven." :whistle:

My brain hurt after reading that.
Train like your life depends on it.  Some day, it may.

Offline Hamish Seggie

  • Army.ca Legend
  • *****
  • 232,497
  • Rate Post
  • Posts: 10,449
  • This is my son Michael, KIA Afghanistan 3 Sep 08
Re: Alleged PMO obstruction in SNC Lavalin case
« Reply #1087 on: September 12, 2019, 14:50:04 »
In the words a famous and wise philosopher who knows all about scandals, "A proof is a proof. What kind of a proof? It's a proof. A proof is a proof. And when you have a good proof, it's because it's proven." :whistle:


Who could possibly forget that one.....  :facepalm:
Freedom Isn't Free   "Never Shall I Fail My Brothers"

“Do everything that is necessary and nothing that is not".

Offline Brihard

  • Army.ca Veteran
  • *****
  • 253,230
  • Rate Post
  • Posts: 4,931
  • Non-Electric Pop-Up Target
Re: Alleged PMO obstruction in SNC Lavalin case
« Reply #1088 on: September 13, 2019, 11:07:32 »
Just to inform the discussion regarding Cabinet Confidentiality, sinc eI've seen people talking about 'well why don't the RCMP get court orders' and such- the applicable section of law is section 39 of the Canada Evidence Act.

This is one of the most cut and dried sections of any law in Canada, and it doesn't offer a legal or judicial mechanism to get around it, as are found with other similar evidentiary exclusions such as those found in sections 37 or 38 relating to public interest, national security, or diplomatic relations.

There is literally no power whatsoever for any judge of any court at any level to override cabinet confidentiality. Ministers of the Crown and the clerk of the Privy Council have an absolute power to withhold cabinet confidences from disclosure. There is no mechanism anywhere that lets police, courts, or any other public body compel the disclosure of cabinet privileged information.
Pacificsm is doctrine fostered by a delusional minority and by the media, which holds forth the proposition it is entirely possible to pick up a turd by the clean end.

Offline ModlrMike

    : Riding time again... woohooo!

  • Army.ca Subscriber
  • Army.ca Veteran
  • *
  • 219,044
  • Rate Post
  • Posts: 3,905
    • Canadian Association of Physician Assistants
Re: Alleged PMO obstruction in SNC Lavalin case
« Reply #1089 on: September 13, 2019, 20:10:14 »
As the Clerk of the Privy Council reports to the PM, the buck stops with Mr Trudeau.
WARNING: The consumption of alcohol may create the illusion that you are tougher,smarter, faster and better looking than most people.
Every normal man must be tempted, at times, to spit upon his hands, hoist the black flag, and begin slitting throats. (H.L. Mencken 1919)
Zero tolerance is the politics of the lazy. All it requires is that you do nothing and ban everything.

Offline milnews.ca

  • Info Curator, Baker & Food Slut
  • Directing Staff
  • Army.ca Relic
  • *
  • 441,530
  • Rate Post
  • Posts: 22,508
    • MILNEWS.ca-Military News for Canadians
Re: Alleged PMO obstruction in SNC Lavalin case
« Reply #1090 on: September 13, 2019, 20:11:23 »
... There is literally no power whatsoever for any judge of any court at any level to override cabinet confidentiality ...
Unless a new government wants to change the law -- opening themselves to losing the protection of cabinet confidence. 
“The risk of insult is the price of clarity.” -- Roy H. Williams

The words I share here are my own, not those of anyone else or anybody I may be affiliated with.

Tony Prudori
MILNEWS.ca - Twitter

Offline Good2Golf

  • Directing Staff
  • Army.ca Legend
  • *
  • 226,575
  • Rate Post
  • Posts: 11,361
  • Dammit! I lost my sand-wedge on that last jump!
Re: Alleged PMO obstruction in SNC Lavalin case
« Reply #1091 on: September 14, 2019, 07:31:18 »
As the Clerk of the Privy Council reports to the PM, the buck stops with Mr Trudeau.

Particularly evident when one describes the Clerk by one of their three functions - the PM's own Deputy Minister.

Regards
G2G

Offline Fishbone Jones

    MSC -7245.

  • "Some people will only like you if you fit inside their box. Don't be afraid to shove that box up their ass."
  • Army.ca Subscriber
  • Army.ca Myth
  • *
  • 281,877
  • Rate Post
  • Posts: 18,682
    • Army.ca
Re: Alleged PMO obstruction in SNC Lavalin case
« Reply #1092 on: September 14, 2019, 10:14:26 »
Ho hum, another day in Trudeau's Canukistan. I really can't fathom how anyone could be surprised by this. His whole tenure has been nothing but deceit and dishonesty. From his election promises four years ago, to the latest debacle, with more to come, I'm sure.
Corruption in politics doesn't scare me.
What scares me is how comfortable people are doing nothing about it.

Offline whiskey601

  • Army.ca Subscriber
  • Army.ca Veteran
  • *
  • 45,635
  • Rate Post
  • Posts: 4,304
Re: Alleged PMO obstruction in SNC Lavalin case
« Reply #1093 on: September 18, 2019, 17:48:12 »
So this appears to be done, because nobody cares anymore. There’s likely no RCMP investigation now. The only people who can pass judgement are the electorate.
Living the lean life

Offline Fishbone Jones

    MSC -7245.

  • "Some people will only like you if you fit inside their box. Don't be afraid to shove that box up their ass."
  • Army.ca Subscriber
  • Army.ca Myth
  • *
  • 281,877
  • Rate Post
  • Posts: 18,682
    • Army.ca
Re: Alleged PMO obstruction in SNC Lavalin case
« Reply #1094 on: September 29, 2019, 18:45:50 »
So this appears to be done, because nobody cares anymore. There’s likely no RCMP investigation now. The only people who can pass judgement are the electorate.

Keep living the dream. Many are just stupid and only vote the latest lie or sound bite. I don't have confidence in the electorate, especially Sanctuary City and east of Ontario. Perhaps I'll be pleasantly surprised on the 22nd, but I'm not getting my hopes up.
Corruption in politics doesn't scare me.
What scares me is how comfortable people are doing nothing about it.

Offline Colin P

  • Army.ca Fixture
  • *****
  • 149,585
  • Rate Post
  • Posts: 9,729
  • Civilian
    • http://www.pacific.ccg-gcc.gc.ca
Re: Alleged PMO obstruction in SNC Lavalin case
« Reply #1095 on: September 30, 2019, 10:52:20 »
So this appears to be done, because nobody cares anymore. There’s likely no RCMP investigation now. The only people who can pass judgement are the electorate.

To whom the Liberals are throwing monetary promises to in vast quantities.

Offline remember

  • Banned
  • Guest
  • *
  • 50
  • Rate Post
  • Posts: 3
  • Do not gloat yet 4 the next post will cost $50000
Re: Alleged PMO obstruction in SNC Lavalin case
« Reply #1096 on: September 30, 2019, 18:05:22 »
With due respect, Liberals are good in juggling of our tax returns where their rhetoric sounds as if we are given enormous monies. I get taxed $ 650 every month. So that is $ 8000 in taxes per year. I get a total $ 2,500 in tax returns and other benefits. I am not whining because of my expected pensions. I also do not care if I get taxed 40% for overtime. I saved $300,000. I will buy a seniors apartment when I retire. No complaints because the Conservatives did the same.