FJAG's latest activity
-
Sharper than a serpent's tooth, I tell ya (highlights mine) ..... Source - archived link Source - archived link -
FJAG replied to the thread Funny Pix & Video Thread.That deserved more laugh emojis than the system allowed so . . . :ROFLMAO: :ROFLMAO: :ROFLMAO: :ROFLMAO: :ROFLMAO: :ROFLMAO: :ROFLMAO...
-
My favourite!
-
FJAG replied to the thread Canada's tanks.Sometimes you are so far off the mark . . . Don't get wrapped around the axle by one org chart from long ago. I expect the fact that...
-
That is a very very poor take on what mortars do, why units hold them organically, or how targets are shot. I get its tongue in cheek...
-
You know mortars take counter fire and move as well right? Just a point, you aren’t wrong that the recce screen needs its own fires.
-
It looks like the mortars are going to be infantry only. Up to the Brigade commander where they are going to sit. The rest of the...
-
FJAG replied to the thread Canada's tanks.I don't consider it a shot at all. I'm a firm believer in an infantry battalion having its own indirect fire resources. How those are...
-
FJAG reacted to Blackadder1916's post in the thread Informing the Army’s Future Structure with
Insightful.
When does a "logistical" function (e.g., moving pers) stop and a "tactical" function (e.g., moving the elements of a sub-sub unit into... -
FJAG replied to the thread Canada's tanks.I'll get back to you by PM on this. I don't whole heartedly agree. I certainly agree that each unit needs an FSCC and a set of...
-
FJAG replied to the thread Indirect Fires Modernization Project - C3/M777 Replacement.It's not a simple change though. It's a developing continuum of measures and counter measures. It's an interesting time, however. Air...
-
FJAG replied to the thread Informing the Army’s Future Structure.That all depends on which side of the argument you are on - the side that views this simply as transport which provides excellent all...
-
FJAG replied to the thread Canada's tanks.I'm certainly not a defender of wheeled IFVs. I've stated my preference for tracks many times. My understanding was that at the time...
-
Problem being this was written by the armour school and not to meet needs identified by the field force so it’s a bit of a shit show...
-
Ajax would be my pick, however if we’re buying it to conduct tasks that can be better done by a tank one wonders why not just buy bloody...
