Search results

??? 2006, there was tons of bitching about it here (still is) about warrior/fat camp platoon etc.

A simpler fix.....bring back mandatory fitness testing prior to shipping people off to St. Jean. 

I am willing to submit another FOI, but from what I saw (in albeit my brief time) in recruiting, is that very very few of the 35+ age group in the application process had that kind of experience to offer

Merged Several topcs and now there is 5 pages of info....I seriously can't believe, that.  If you can't figure out what to wear during a job recruitment process within 5 pages....you have issues. Locked.

I seriously don't understand why Canada and the US have not implemented a travel ban for anyone who has been to those countries.

https://www.canlii.org/en/#search/all=joint%20submission%20rejection https://www.google.com/search?q=Canada+legal+precedents+rejecting+a+joint+submission&hl=en&sa=X&as_q=&nfpr=&spell=1&ei=IHg6VPySO43maonJgIAD&ved=0CBEQvwU have fun reading.

And the first step, is if you see something you SAY something.  If you aren't saying something, you are complicit, and might as well be championing it. No one has jumped on anything, or made assumptions, because YOU KEEP SAYING YOU WILL DO IT, in fact your sentence contradicts itself.  Never...

Keep it civil Journeyman, your incessant attempts to bait FJAG are getting tiresome.  If he wants to withhold comment until he has all the details, that is his prerogative.  Until then you are free to do your own research about case law regarding joint submissions here https://www.canlii.org/en/ca/

Why is that unfortunate?  It may not necessarily be a smart thing to do career wise (but given the precedent perhaps, all they will get is a slap on the wrist), but I think it's a very telling gesture that many people serving and non-serving, have some serious issues with not only this officer...

Really.....so of course you would have zero issue letting them drive you (or your kids if you have any) around?

Alright this is driving me nuts, you obviously found this site, so you can obviously find the plethora of existing threads and topics regarding the MP branch, since you actually agreed to do just that (search for existing threads) when you signed up here. locked

I have seen summay trial results posted in base/unit RO's (Meaford for example).

That too.

Summary trial wasn't an option, since she was facing 3x charges for " unlawful use of military uniforms or certificates " which is a criminal code charge (s.419) and not one that is triable at summary trial. (http://www.admfincs.forces.gc.ca/qro-orf/vol-02/chapter-chapitre-108-eng.asp para 3a )

A good place to start is early, ie in the recruiting/basic training phase.  Why we don't piss test applicants is beyond me.  I mean most assume we do already, it's actually more of a surprise to them when they find out we don't.

Just finished reading "PERV: The Sexual Deviant in all of us" (I was wandering through an Indigo back home while on leave, aimlessly looking for anything interesting...and well I was sold on the title alone.).  It's an interesting read to say the least, makes you think what is really going on...

The new firearms licensing ammendments have been tabled. Here is a video of the Minister's press announcement http://www.cbc.ca/player/Shows/ID/2545914821/ And the tabled Act http://www.parl.gc.ca/HousePublications/Publication.aspx?Language=E&Mode=1&DocId=6719328&File=4

There might be an actual efficient way of doing it (ie software), or just having leadership that really knows their troops.  Example at the 48th, for a few years we had some really switched on FTUC, that knew which troops were available for short notice taskings, like the back of their hand. ...

1 person who can't search, and another way outside his lanes..... yup locked.

http://army.ca/forums/index.php/board,44.0.html 7 pages worth of information, start reading. And since this is a question regarding an occupational transfer after you are in, and not a recruiting topic,  this topic is locked