• Thanks for stopping by. Logging in to a registered account will remove all generic ads. Please reach out with any questions or concerns.

Article in CBC: Military spending Where the parties stand on the big-ticket item

PanaEng

Sr. Member
Inactive
Reaction score
0
Points
210
Didn't see it here yet so here it is: (under fair share provisions...)

Military spending
Where the parties stand on the big-ticket items
Last Updated: Monday, October 6, 2008 | 4:50 PM ET Comments9Recommend15
By Brian Kemp, CBC News
http://www.cbc.ca/news/canadavotes/story/2008/10/03/f-elxn-militaryspending.html

We are involved in a war in Afghanistan, and it's not cheap. But by most accounts, we have a
well-equipped military in the war zone, after defence spending almost doubled in 10 years.
The days of an under-equipped Canadian military seem over, but they came with a price: the annual
budget for the military in 2008 is slightly more than $18 billion, up from slightly more than $9.92 billion
in 1997-98 (with the actual expenditure turning out to be $10.12 billion). The cost of the mission in
Afghanistan up to 2011 should be released shortly, and there are many numbers out there — all guesses
so far — ranging from $4 billion to $22 billion.
Equipping the Afghanistan mission has moved along fairly smoothly (including purchasing high-tech
unmanned aerial vehicles and tanks), but in other areas of the military, there have been some big blips,
particularly when it comes to procuring helicopters as well as new Arctic patrol vessels and search and
rescue ships, all of which are outstanding.
Late in the summer, for example, the Conservatives announced that the $340-million plan to purchase
patrol vessels for the coast guard was put on hold "because the bid prices exceeded the anticipated cost,"
according to Public Works. As well, a $2.9-billion plan to build two supply ships was also put on hold.

More in link

 
The stock photo they chose for that article is a very, very familiar patch of road. I hate that place. Kinda eerie when you start seeing places you know in the photos.
 
"Greens

The Green party has vowed to slash military spending but has provided no details."

Pardon me while I die of shock  ::)
 
All of these leaders jumped on Harper during last week's debate for not producing a platform. Look at their 'platforms' with regards to foreign policy. Could they be any more vague? At least Harper has given some clear objectives for military spending and affixed price tags to them.

NDP

There is no mention of what would be done with the promised increases to the military budget.

There are no details on future funding.

::)
 
NDP Platform - take weapons away and make us pick up garbage using a pointed stick.
Greens - make us pick up garbage but not allowed to have a pointed stick as that can be used as a weapon.
Liberals - Defence Platform? How high should it be?
 
Back
Top