- Reaction score
- 1,183
- Points
- 1,260
21 March, 2011
Association of Municipalities of Ontario:
http://www.amo.on.ca/AM/Template.cfm?Section=Home&CONTENTID=161035&TEMPLATE=/CM/HTMLDisplay.cfm
A bill was introduced Monday by the Ontario Liberals* which would require municipal employers to set a minimum mandatory retirement age of 60 for firefighters involved in fire suppression.
The concern of the AMO seems to be that because the average age of Firefighter recruits is steadily getting older, that this will affect their pensionable time. For example, you still only have to be 18 to join Toronto Emergency Services ( as many of us were ), but the waiting list for Firefighter has grown so long that by 2008 the average age of TFS recruits had risen to 31.69.
Some questions from the AMO:
• "Whether it would apply to just full-time firefighters or also to volunteer firefighters and if so, the impact on those services?"
• "What is the meaning of ‘fire suppression’ activities—does it include fire engineers, suppression training, or communications activities?"
• "Would it apply to fire management officers?"
"An AMO report sent to city clerks and councils Tuesday notes firefighters are entering the workforce older than in previous decades and it should be expected fire suppression personnel will not have their pensionable years by age 60."
"The AMO report raises several other issues with the legislation, including the likelihood that municipalities would have to find alternate duties for firefighters at age 60 if they don’t wish to retire."
Toronto Sun
April 19, 2011
The second AMO item is:
"Recently municipal councillors may have received a letter from the fire sector that suggests a broadening of fire dispatch and to mandate the use of fire services in all life and limb threatening medical emergencies.
While principally, it would be difficult not to agree with the statements in the letter, operationally there is more to consider than the correspondence provides and has some implications that need to be considered, such as governance and performance since fire is predominantly at the lower tier and EMS predominantly at the upper tier and through DSSABs** in the north. There are cost implications and needs to be considered in the broader context of local resource allocations."
Highlight mine.
*Firefighters have shown their support for Premier McGuinty in the past:
"Firefighters went the extra yard, in fact, rushing outside before a campaign event in Toronto to cordon off a path for the premier, allowing him to avoid a potentially embarrassing photo with a Pinocchio-like mascot nicknamed "Fibber." It's the invention of the Canadian Taxpayers Federation (CTF), designed to remind McGuinty about his broken tax pledge."
Ottawa Citizen/National Post
September 13, 2007
**District Social Services Administration Boards Act
Association of Municipalities of Ontario:
http://www.amo.on.ca/AM/Template.cfm?Section=Home&CONTENTID=161035&TEMPLATE=/CM/HTMLDisplay.cfm
A bill was introduced Monday by the Ontario Liberals* which would require municipal employers to set a minimum mandatory retirement age of 60 for firefighters involved in fire suppression.
The concern of the AMO seems to be that because the average age of Firefighter recruits is steadily getting older, that this will affect their pensionable time. For example, you still only have to be 18 to join Toronto Emergency Services ( as many of us were ), but the waiting list for Firefighter has grown so long that by 2008 the average age of TFS recruits had risen to 31.69.
Some questions from the AMO:
• "Whether it would apply to just full-time firefighters or also to volunteer firefighters and if so, the impact on those services?"
• "What is the meaning of ‘fire suppression’ activities—does it include fire engineers, suppression training, or communications activities?"
• "Would it apply to fire management officers?"
"An AMO report sent to city clerks and councils Tuesday notes firefighters are entering the workforce older than in previous decades and it should be expected fire suppression personnel will not have their pensionable years by age 60."
"The AMO report raises several other issues with the legislation, including the likelihood that municipalities would have to find alternate duties for firefighters at age 60 if they don’t wish to retire."
Toronto Sun
April 19, 2011
The second AMO item is:
"Recently municipal councillors may have received a letter from the fire sector that suggests a broadening of fire dispatch and to mandate the use of fire services in all life and limb threatening medical emergencies.
While principally, it would be difficult not to agree with the statements in the letter, operationally there is more to consider than the correspondence provides and has some implications that need to be considered, such as governance and performance since fire is predominantly at the lower tier and EMS predominantly at the upper tier and through DSSABs** in the north. There are cost implications and needs to be considered in the broader context of local resource allocations."
Highlight mine.
*Firefighters have shown their support for Premier McGuinty in the past:
"Firefighters went the extra yard, in fact, rushing outside before a campaign event in Toronto to cordon off a path for the premier, allowing him to avoid a potentially embarrassing photo with a Pinocchio-like mascot nicknamed "Fibber." It's the invention of the Canadian Taxpayers Federation (CTF), designed to remind McGuinty about his broken tax pledge."
Ottawa Citizen/National Post
September 13, 2007
**District Social Services Administration Boards Act