- Reaction score
- 7,168
- Points
- 1,360
He points to Canada as an example of how it could be done:
The Interpreter blog, Lowly Institute for International Policy, 24 Aug 11.... The full glare of the parliamentary press gallery will blaze as military colleagues say final goodbyes. Because, by convention, Julia Gillard and Tony Abbott will take no other media appearances that day, the military funeral will become the only vision TV networks have of our political leaders. By virtue of the politicians' attendance, a private funeral will become a nationally televised political event.
For the next two weeks, when Australians think about the war in Afghanistan they will think of the only military event important enough to unite political and Defence leaders — the death of another young soldier. AusAID's development progress won't be in their minds, nor will the pressure on the Taliban being applied by our special forces. If form is any guide, media networks will run polls on our involvement in Afghanistan right at the time when coverage is dominated by terrible news. Australians, when asked what our Afghan strategy should be, will make an emotional decision framed by a military funeral.
(....)
Until early 2006, Canadian military forces had incurred eight deaths in Afghanistan. During 2006 there were 35 Canadian military fatalities, and approximately 30 deaths again in each of the three subsequent years. In 2006, Canadians elected a conservative government led by Stephen Harper which decided that flags across the country would no longer be lowered to half mast for every Afghan military fatality.
The move was controversial, and was explained by the then Canadian Defence Minister (himself a retired general with 30 years Army service) as a return to the tradition of previous wars where soldiers were commemorated on Remembrance Day. A national editorial at the time captured best the reasons why Canada should not grind to a halt every time a soldier died in Afghanistan:
The four Canadian men who gave their lives for Canadian security and Afghan freedom on Saturday should be mourned as heroes. But as the inheritors of a proud and stoic Canadian military tradition, they would not have wanted their deaths to be an occasion for grief on such a scale that it undermines their comrades' mission. Once Parliament — and, by extension, the nation — begins treating death in the field as something extraordinary and unexpected, we will have tacitly embraced the myth that our mission in Afghanistan will be peaceful and bloodless ....


