Maybe they just like those thingsI noticed that too

Maybe they just like those thingsI noticed that too
Holy crap!
Given the context of the initial statement I'd guess said property belongs to the governmentWhat I’m interested in is that they are accused of “planning to forcibly take control of property”. WTF?
Me too.What I’m interested in is that they are accused of “planning to forcibly take control of property”. WTF?
Hey the 51st State isn’t just going to make itself…What I’m interested in is that they are accused of “planning to forcibly take control of property”. WTF?
For the two who are CAF members, this case could border line treason? Or conspiracy to commit treason?
The Mountie statement said “forcibly take possession of land in the Québec City area” …What I’m interested in is that they are accused of “planning to forcibly take control of property”. WTF?
Must of missed that part of my DP2The Canadian YouTube talk shows are having a meltdown. It’s like they think that everyone in the CAF is a cold blooded SEAL Team killer. It’s bloody comical.
It was probably one of those after lunch lectures when everyone was asleep.Must of missed that part of my DP2
Its one of the parts they cut out for the PRes.Must of missed that part of my DP2
Thats why I dont get to be a RCEME seal? DangIts one of the parts they cut out for the PRes.![]()
I wasn’t asleep! The course Warrant would have shoved his pace stick so far up my ass it would have tickled my tonsils if I did!It was probably one of those after lunch lectures when everyone was asleep.
Maybe they're just enthusiasts who really like explosives, and really like taking over government buildings.I'm curious as to what exactly the "16 explosive devices" were. Gonna have to wait until this hits the court I guess.
Its been a while since I was on a range that had live M72s but I do think the whole shebang had to be returned once it was fired.RE LAWs, realistically how hard would it be to get a tube off a range? Ive only ever done one LAW range but we only had 10 launchers so easy to count. At the end the ammo guy specifically accounted for all ten to return as salvage. He was telling me there are extra precautions as it is a complete weapon systems and not just ammo, thus more strict. Mind you this was 6-7 years ago and I haven't seen one since, could have just had a very diligent ammo NCO.
Is there any reality to that? Could a guy hypothetically "lose" a LAW into a ruck with an incompetent ammo NCO and lie during an ammo dec or is it more controlled?