So, you must have missed this:
Brennan is one of the women at the heart of allegations first reported by Global News in February about former chief of the defence staff Gen. Jonathan Vance.
globalnews.ca
Brennan claims there were threats of consequences, though not of physical violence, and she claims that she felt she could not say “no”
I just want to be sure I am clear about my position on this specific matter. I realize that unless someone is randomly reading this thread from several pages ago, it is worth repeating and clarifying.
I fully support Maj. Brennan in coming forwards with her complaints, and I genuinely support a very thorough investigation to determine the facts. If those facts support the allegations against Vance, then I believe Vance should be handled accordingly. *I personally believe that if someone in such a powerful position politically, is supposed to be a solid role model for other leaders - AND is the head honcho of Op. Honour - then he should be treated perhaps more harshly than others. I cannot stress enough how much I truly appreciate and value individuals who lead from the front, by example, and own up to mistakes - the older I get, the more I appreciate those qualities.
I am very much inclined to support someone who comes forwards & reports misconduct. I am also in no way, shape, or form in a position to question or comment on any
specifics until the results of the investigations are released to the public. I'm in the same boat as everybody else here, and have access to the same info.
I am not attempting to victim blame in the slightest. And my opinion is very much open to being changed on the matter, I am very much trying to take the approach of 'wait and see what comes out in the investigation'. However, only based on what she has said publically so far, I do find myself getting frustrated with her statements. Just facepalm type of reaction. When the details come out, perhaps that will no longer be the case.
As Adjt I once had to deal with two Officers, friends, who were accused of sexual assault.
We had served together on operational tours, partied on weekends, lived in the mess together etc.
During the investigation we had no contact with each other at all. No one told us to do that. It just made sense and seemed to serve the needs of the case. We all understood that.
Once the case was cleared up (they were exonerated) things went back to normal. No hard feelings.
All three of us were Captains, aged between about 27 and 29 years at the time.
We figured it out.
It's just too bad that a bunch of the most senior Officers in the CAF couldn't have done the same.
A few years back, I actually had a complaint filed against me and an investigation was initiated. People who I had been chatting with daily for a few years, instantly yet politely distanced themselves from me. I understood why, and just went with things.
I was exonerated, and like you said, things went back to normal pretty quickly afterwards. I was 28yo at the time.
(An individual who had been charged with some financial crimes and was going through court processes initiated a complaint, hoping they could use the fact that I was under investigation to help get them off the hook come trial.)
Like you said, nobody really discussed it. It was understood all around. Everybody was professional, and when things were all said & done, life went back to normal.
It really is a shame that some good officers are going to have their proud careers end on a negative note, due to the behaviour of their colleagues.
The part i'm confused about is this event would of been on their schedules for some time. People around them would of known in advance that the golfing event was planned and with who it was planned.
I highly doubt none of their subordinates would of mentioned the bad optics of this. I've worked under Vice Admiral Baines when he was Esquimalt's Base Commander. I have tremendous respect for this guy, but I also know his schedule is well planned out for weeks if not month's in advance.
I guess it is possible that nobody raised an issue with it before the event. But I highly doubt it.
Good point.