Sure FJAG. And the CAF continue to self immolate on this, or get with the program.
It isn't self immolation by the CAF as a corporate entity anymore. It's individuals who still don't get the message and other individuals who tolerate bad behaviour. Most of the senior cases are historical ones. There's nothing anyone can do about that - they'll come out over time and be categorized under the standards of today. That's just the way it is in our judgmental society.
There is nothing wrong with the current definition of sexual misconduct. It was supposed to cover many behaviours which exist on a continuum but have a related common theme. Within the policy are graduated responses appropriate to the level of misconduct.
The problem facing the CAF is that there are still folks who still don't understand, or who do not want to accept, that their behaviour or that of others in their presence is misconduct within the society that we've become. You can argue until you're blue in the face as to whether society's standards are right or wrong but the fact of the matter is that things are the way they are and they are not about to change backwards. If anything, things will progress.
The reason the CAF is where it is today is because far too many people didn't get with the program when the program first came out. At the time the system assumed people would follow orders and cooperate. Many did. Too many didn't. So now there will be a new program to get with. Don't be surprised if this becomes the "puppies getting their noses rubbed in it" phase of behaviour modification. Those who issue your paychecks have taken notice and the CAF is the crisis du jour. They can't do anything about sexual misconduct in high schools or universities but they sure as hell can do, and want to be seen as doing, something about it in their own bailiwick.
