• Thanks for stopping by. Logging in to a registered account will remove all generic ads. Please reach out with any questions or concerns.

Steel cutting on new Navy tugs

Colin Parkinson

Army.ca Legend
Reaction score
2,036
Points
940
Steel cutting on new Navy tugs
219-034-RAmparts-2400-NLT-GA.jpg


https://twitter.com/CanadianForces/status/1309195208450609156


Some background
https://ral.ca/2019/06/25/robert-allan-ltd-to-design-new-tugs-for-the-canadian-navy/

Details of the selected NLT design include:

Length overall: 24.4 m
Beam, moulded: 11.25 m
Draft: 5.10 m
Bollard Pull: 60 T
Speed: 12 knots
Crew: 6
 

MilEME09

Army.ca Veteran
Reaction score
923
Points
1,090
Only 4? I do not know anything about port operations but that seems like a small number. How busy will these tugs be?
 

Oldgateboatdriver

Army.ca Veteran
Reaction score
255
Points
880
Technically, they are replacing six tugs: The five Glen class and the last remaining fire tug.

In practice, the fire tugs (when we had one on each coast) were never used in their capacity as tug boats during the week and regular working hours. They were only used as such - infrequently - outside working days/hours when the other tugs were secured alongside for the night/week-end. Since those new tugs have double capacity as fire tugs, it will simply be a matter of having one available at all times to cover the "fire" duty.

As for tug work, you can look at them as replacing five tugs with four, however, the East coast fleet is now and for the foreseeable future, smaller than it was at the end of the Cold War, with eighteen warships (12x DDH, 2X AOR, 3x SSK and Cormorant). So reducing Halifax to 2 tugs vice 3 is not going to make much difference. Moreover, with three times the bollard pull capacity they can do more work more easily.

Finally, you still have the light tugs (Ville class) to complement on both coasts.
 

Underway

Army.ca Veteran
Donor
Reaction score
926
Points
1,010
Oldgateboatdriver said:
Technically, they are replacing six tugs: The five Glen class and the last remaining fire tug.

In practice, the fire tugs (when we had one on each coast) were never used in their capacity as tug boats during the week and regular working hours. They were only used as such - infrequently - outside working days/hours when the other tugs were secured alongside for the night/week-end. Since those new tugs have double capacity as fire tugs, it will simply be a matter of having one available at all times to cover the "fire" duty.

As for tug work, you can look at them as replacing five tugs with four, however, the East coast fleet is now and for the foreseeable future, smaller than it was at the end of the Cold War, with eighteen warships (12x DDH, 2X AOR, 3x SSK and Cormorant). So reducing Halifax to 2 tugs vice 3 is not going to make much difference. Moreover, with three times the bollard pull capacity they can do more work more easily.

Finally, you still have the light tugs (Ville class) to complement on both coasts.

Agreed.  You only need four big tugs.  Three available and one on maintenance.  The smaller Ville tugs do lots of work and have no issues pushing a frigate around when in company with a big tug.  Generally there are only three tug crews available at a time anyways, barring a busy schedule. 
 

Good2Golf

Moderator
Staff member
Directing Staff
Subscriber
Mentor
Reaction score
3,366
Points
1,260
So it’s back to Kort nozzles? Are Voith-Schneider systems passé?
 

Spencer100

Sr. Member
Reaction score
60
Points
280
So it’s back to Kort nozzles? Are Voith-Schneider systems passé?

I had to google
 

Colin Parkinson

Army.ca Legend
Reaction score
2,036
Points
940
So it’s back to Kort nozzles? Are Voith-Schneider systems passé?
Both systems are good, more horses for courses I suspect, the tugs often have to travel and many of the Voith-Schneider systems don't by design have lot of directional stability making them a pain to take anywhere.
 
Top