User talk:Michael Dorosh: Difference between revisions

From Army.ca Wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
 
Line 37: Line 37:
I edited the info box colours for The RCR to regimental colours.  Others may ask how to do the same. [[User:Michael OLeary|Michael OLeary]] 22:54, 20 May 2006 (EDT)
I edited the info box colours for The RCR to regimental colours.  Others may ask how to do the same. [[User:Michael OLeary|Michael OLeary]] 22:54, 20 May 2006 (EDT)
:I was thinking of that as well; harder to do for regiments with more than two colours. Guards regiment would be simple enough - maroon and blue. I haven't figured a way to put image files in the background of tables like you can in HTML; tartan backgrounds or regimental stripes are out unfortunately.[[User:Michael Dorosh|Michael Dorosh]] 23:46, 20 May 2006 (EDT)
:I was thinking of that as well; harder to do for regiments with more than two colours. Guards regiment would be simple enough - maroon and blue. I haven't figured a way to put image files in the background of tables like you can in HTML; tartan backgrounds or regimental stripes are out unfortunately.[[User:Michael Dorosh|Michael Dorosh]] 23:46, 20 May 2006 (EDT)
::Hmm....very clever with the periods....:-) [[User:Michael Dorosh|Michael Dorosh]] 23:47, 20 May 2006 (EDT)

Latest revision as of 23:47, 20 May 2006

Simple questions on wiki formatting may be left here. To leave a question, either click EDIT at the top of the page, type your question, then click the SAVE PAGE button below the edit window - or just use the + symbol to the right of the edit tab to start a new section.

Please Start New Questions At the Bottom of the Page

Add vs. Edit?

I'm admittedly new to the "talk" feature but would it make sense to have editors use the + link (to the right of Edit) to add a question rather than edit the contents of the talk page directly?

Bobbitt 16:34, 17 May 2006 (EDT) :)

Wow

Huh....been using wikipedia for months and never fooled around with the + symbol before. Seems to work nice! Don't forget to sign your name by typing four tildes in a row ~~~~ !! :-) Michael Dorosh 16:29, 17 May 2006 (EDT)

For adding replies, you would still have to EDIT the section; but the + is good for new questions. Thanks for pointing that out! Michael Dorosh 16:30, 17 May 2006 (EDT)

Colour of info boxes

I see you changed the info box of the Winnipeg Rifles to green. Does this mean all rifle regiments are going to be green? I would like to know for future reference so that I can make the change right away. I was wondering if the colours were related to berret colours in any way.

  • I thought because it was a Rifle Regiment it might look good in rifle green with black letters. The colours I've been using so far have been
    • Armoured Regiment: Black (white letters)
    • Infantry Regiment: Scarlet (white letters)
    • Rifle Regiment: Green (black letters)
    • Engineer Regiment: Navy (red letters)
    • Airborne Regiment: Maroon
    • CSOR: Tan

The last two were inspired by beret colour I suppose. :-) Just seemed natural...any suggestions on a better system are ok by me.Michael Dorosh 23:24, 19 May 2006 (EDT)

info box

I assume the info box is that which holds unit crests on the regimental info pages, I would like to add one to the RMR one but Idon't know how. --Hockeysgal 16:43, 20 May 2006 (EDT) hockeysgal

  • Easiest way is to edit one of the pages that does have one by clicking EDIT, then cutting and pasting into your page, and changing the info. I can do it for you if you like, let me know if you're still having trouble.Michael Dorosh 16:44, 20 May 2006 (EDT)

Re: Info box colours.

I edited the info box colours for The RCR to regimental colours. Others may ask how to do the same. Michael OLeary 22:54, 20 May 2006 (EDT)

I was thinking of that as well; harder to do for regiments with more than two colours. Guards regiment would be simple enough - maroon and blue. I haven't figured a way to put image files in the background of tables like you can in HTML; tartan backgrounds or regimental stripes are out unfortunately.Michael Dorosh 23:46, 20 May 2006 (EDT)
Hmm....very clever with the periods....:-) Michael Dorosh 23:47, 20 May 2006 (EDT)