|
|
| Line 1: |
Line 1: |
| I was thinking, with the unit list, changing the format to this:
| |
|
| |
|
| ==Saskatchewan==
| |
| ===Regina===
| |
| 18 F Bty [[10th Field Artillery Regiment RCA]] <br>
| |
| [[The Royal Regina Rifles]]<br>
| |
| [[16 (Saskatchewan) Service Battalion]]<br>
| |
| [[16 Field Ambulance (Regina & Saskatoon)]]<br>
| |
|
| |
| Then having the addresses on the unit pages themselves, that way the unit page won't be so long. We then make a whole bunch of "stubs" by making pages for the Svc Bns (and other unit types) with their addresses, even if there is nothing else. That way when people come accross it they can add themselves. I find it easier to add to something than create something new. I would like to know what you think. I have lots of time as my job hasn't started yet, so I can make the changes.<br>
| |
| <br>
| |
| [[User:Vangemeren|Jack]] 23:42, 22 May 2006 (EDT)
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
| I always anticipated linking the units to the existing regiment pages (don't know if I will get the time though). It would certainly make a shorter list to move addresses into the Regt page.
| |
| http://army.ca/wiki/index.php/Army_Reserve_Units_%28by_Location%29#St._Thomas
| |
|
| |
| ----
| |
|
| |
| I've got all the time in the world, If you could just give me the command structure with empty links, I can do all the grunt work of filling the pages. The addresses are from my list, so I know most of the names and locations, but not the higher formations.
| |
| <br>
| |
| [[User:Vangemeren|Jack jr.]] 15:57, 23 May 2006 (EDT)
| |
|
| |
|
| |
| I've jsut been using the same pages linked from the brigade lists & lists of regiments.
| |
