• Thanks for stopping by. Logging in to a registered account will remove all generic ads. Please reach out with any questions or concerns.

On the lighter side

Status
Not open for further replies.

Edward Campbell

Army.ca Myth
Subscriber
Donor
Mentor
Reaction score
4,317
Points
1,160
I know politics is not a joke, but ...

This article, which is reproduced under the Fair Dealing provisions of the Copyright Act from the Globe and Mail, indicates one of two things:

    1. The fabled Rhinoceros Party has made a comeback with its trademark mix of sophomoric comedy and poor taste; or, more likely

    2. We have a lot of seriously stupid people in Montreal Quebec Canada:

http://www.theglobeandmail.com/news/politics/new-montreal-mayoral-hopeful-feels-americans-are-obese-imbecilic-ignorant/article13002086/#dashboard/follows/
New Montreal mayoral hopeful feels Americans are ‘obese, imbecilic, ignorant’[/size]

MONTREAL — The Canadian Press

Published Thursday, Jul. 04 2013

Here’s some Fourth of July news for our U.S. neighbours: a man running for mayor of Montreal considers Americans dumb, obese, imbecilic, classless ignoramuses.

Staunch Quebec independentiste Michel Brûlé announced Thursday his long-shot candidacy for the November election.

The book publisher, writer, and former bar owner says he doesn’t expect English-speaking Montrealers to vote for him – and says he isn’t working to get their support, anyway.

He has written extensively in the past about English, which he says is not a nice language. For example, he points to the capitalized first-person singular in English – “I” – as a sign of individualism.

In a recent piece for Le Devoir – titled For or Against Anglo-American Cultural Imperialism? – he bemoans the omnipresence of English culture and says the language of Paul McCartney is also the language of the genocide of aboriginal peoples and the Acadian deportations.

And he appears less than enamoured with Americans. He told Metro newspaper in 2009 that not all Americans are dumb, obese, imbecilic, uncultured ignoramuses – only about 80 per cent of them.

“If I say Americans are a bunch of big, obese, imbecilic, ignorant, uncultured dummies, it’s the truth,” he told the newspaper.

“Of course it’s sure bet that out of 303 million Americans, there are maybe 50 million who aren’t like that. But, collectively, they’re still a bunch of uncultured imbeciles.”

It’s unclear what sort of a constituency Brûlé’s message might gain him.

He is not considered among the three main front-runners for the race.

And, in the last campaign, a candidate who questioned the official story of the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks was grilled over his views and finished third. That third-place candidate from the last race, Richard Bergeron, is running again as head of a prominent local grassroots party.

The two presumed front-runners are former immigration minister Denis Coderre and Marcel Côté, a fellow at Harvard University, economist, businessman, management consultant, local philanthropist, and official in the Prime Minister’s Office of Brian Mulroney.

Anglo voters do carry some clout in the city. Côté was recruited by a former péquiste cabinet minister, Louise Harel, who announced she would not run for mayor this time because she conceded that she couldn’t win votes in English-speaking areas.

Brûlé told a TV interviewer Thursday that he wouldn’t even bother trying. He noted that Anglos voted in 2009 for a party mired in scandal, instead of Harel or Bergeron. He said that as mayor he would emphasize the city’s francophone status.

Brûlé has said in the past that he doesn’t have anything against Anglos, on an individual level. He says he could even have one as a girlfriend.

But still, he says, it’s not a very nice culture.

“English is not a nice language,” he told Metro in 2009, while promoting his published essay on the scourge of English.

“Intolerance and all the most extremist, racist, segregationist movements – they’re the KKK, White Power, the expression ‘Speak White,’ these are all English things. They come from the United States, Canada, England.”

In a January, 2013, opinion piece published in Le Devoir, he took a jab at a Beatle.

He bemoaned the fact that when McCartney played on the Plains of Abraham in 2008, and a prominent nationalist politician complained about an English show on the old battlefield where the French were defeated in 1759, that politician drew considerable ridicule while McCartney played to a monster crowd.

“[Politician] Pierre Curzi ... was practically excommunicated for having criticized that choice,” Brûlé wrote, in a lengthy critique of Anglo cultural hegemony.

“Sir Paul, representative of England – which is responsible for the genocide of 40 million Amerindians, the deportation of the Acadians and the assimilation of French-Canadians after so many demands to ‘Speak White’ – made an amnesiac people dance for a few hours.”


We really do need a political rubbish heap thread for M. Brûlé and his (too many) fellow travelers.
 
He seems earnest in his views, not Rhino.  It appears to me he is just exhibiting the unfortunate xenophobic claptrap that some Franco Quebecois allow to come to the surface when they show their true colours and face to the world.  Mind you there's their Anglo counterparts here and there too, sad to say. 
 
And, just because stupidity seems to run rampant at Christmas time, I offer this article which is reproduced under the Fair Dealing provisions of the Copyright Act from the National Post:

http://fullcomment.nationalpost.com/2013/12/13/mp-banned-over-dangerous-candy-cane-toss-at-santa-parade/?utm_source=dlvr.it&utm_medium=twitter
5178-NationalPostLogo3.jpg

MP banned over dangerous candy cane toss at Santa parade

Kelly McParland

13/12/13

Add a new horror to the panoply of dangers from which little Canadians need to be protected: candy canes tossed from slow-moving convertibles.

The village of Creemore is a pleasant rural community in a particularly attractive part of cottage country north of Toronto. It may be best known as the site of a brewery of the same name which did much to popularize craft beers in Ontario.

The president of the Creemore Business Improvement Association has let it be known, however, that Dr. Kellie Leitch, the local Member of Parliament, is not welcome to return for next year’s Santa Claus parade. Her crime: tossing candy canes to children as she moved slowly past in the back of a convertible.

According to the local paper, the Stayner Sun, the ruling was issued by Creemore BIA president Corey Finkelstein, who was personally on hand to view the transgression.

    There are two issues,” Finkelstein said. “One is kids could get hurt – they could get bumped by a float or slip and fall under a float while trying to grab a piece of candy. And the second issue is litter – because once candy falls on the ground
    the kids aren’t likely to pick it up and then you have a garbage issue.”

    Finkelstein said he was standing at the intersection of Mill and Caroline streets when he witnessed Leitch tossing candy.

    “I walked up to the car and asked her not to throw candy,” he said. “I said she was told that – she knows the rules.”

Mr. Finkelstein says Dr. Leitch reacted snarkily when he told her to stop, and climbed down from the back of the vintage yellow Triumph Spitfire she was riding in, slowing the parade. Dr. Leitch’s version differs: she says she didn’t want to stop handing candy to the kids part-way through the parade, so she walked the rest of the way and distributed it by hand.

    “I told him I was going to give all the children candy,” she said. “I’d given it to others. There was no altercation. Everyone was in a good mood and excited to get candy canes.”

    “I’ve obviously rubbed this gentlemen (Mr. Finkelstein) the wrong way and I apologize for that,” said Dr. Leitch, who intends to defy the ban. “Christmas is about community and family and Creemore is where I live.”

Canada is in the grip of a kind of madness when it comes to the overprotection of its citizens. Just last week the city of Moncton, N.B. decreed that pleasure skating in municipal rinks is far too dangerous an activity to be allowed for anyone not suitably helmeted, no matter what their age.  Moncton previously banned anyone 12 or under from its arenas unless they were fully equipped with a hockey helmet; now it will extend the ban to adults as well. Last year a child in Straffordville, Ontario, died because the inhaler he needed for his severe asthma attack was locked in the principal’s office, a standard rule to avoid the chance some other child might accidentally take a puff. Another mother famously demanded that trees be cut down to avoid the possibility their nuts might fall to the ground and be gobbled up by a child with allergies.

And now, in Creemore, a lightly tossed candy cane is deemed too dangerous to tolerate.

The banishment of Dr. Leitch seems particularly ill-considered, considering her background. She is an orthopaedic surgeon who served as the chair of paediatric surgery at the Children’s Hospital of Western Ontario, is an orthopaedic pediatric surgeon at The Hospital for Sick Children in Toronto and an associate professor at the University of Toronto. She’s the founder of the Kids Health Foundation, which aims to “make Canada the healthiest place on earth for children to grow up.” In that capacity, before running for office she noted that “unintentional injuries are the number one cause of death among our nation’s children ages one to fourteen.”

In other words, she kind of knows from kids, especially when it comes to accidental injuries. It’s unlikely she would deliberately bean  unsuspecting youths with dangerous candy canes while the stood by the side of the road waiting for Santa.

Mr. Finkelstein may want to rethink his diktat, who sounds a bit peremptory in any light. Dr. Leitch clearly knows much more about children and their health than he does, and he would be wise to put away his rule book for a moment and defer to her judgement. There are authentic dangers from which Canadian children need to be protected. But  Christmas candy isn’t one of them.

National Post


Oh, Canada!  :not-again:
 
People that fearful need to be sealed in plastic bubbles in one of the old Diefenbunkers (if any exist which have not been rendered unusable) and fed a nourishing diet of bacteria-free pap.
 
Brian Gable, the Globe and Mail's editorial cartoonist, gets it right:

web-friedcar03co1.jpg

Source: http://www.theglobeandmail.com/globe-debate/a-celebration-of-the-joyous-human-spirit/article16130567/#dashboard/follows/?7342222
Reproduced under the Fair Dealing provisions of the Copyright Act from the Globe and Mail
 
Two article, both reproduced under the Fair Dealing provisions of the Copyright Act from, respectively, the Globe and Mail and the Ottawa Citizen, caught my eye today, both of which remind me that political and bureaucratic ineptitude, of the highest possible order, exist on both sides of re Canada/US border:

http://www.theglobeandmail.com/report-on-business/international-business/us-business/buy-america-act-provides-punishment-for-small-colorado-town/article20660211/#dashboard/alerts
gam-masthead.png

Canadian steel used in U.S. bridge triggers 'Buy America' fiasco

BARRIE MCKENNA
OTTAWA — The Globe and Mail

Published Thursday, Sep. 18 20134

It is a few thousand dollars worth of Canadian steel installed on a small bridge in a sleepy Colorado town.

But this summer’s rebuilding of the South Park Street Bridge in Morrison, Colo., 20 minutes west of Denver, is also an absurd tale of what happens when two massive integrated economies erect protectionist walls.

Everything was going according to plan when a contractor installed new steel beams on the aging bridge, the main link across a creek that cuts through town.

Then, soon after the bridge reopened, a city engineer spotted an invoice showing the beams were fabricated by Atlas Tube in Harrow, Ont. It was U.S.-cast steel, but rolled into beams across the border in Canada.

And that, under Buy America legislation, automatically disqualified the entire $144,000 (U.S.) project from getting federal funds.

The provisions, which affect transportation projects, were born from a law passed during the Great Depression of the 1930s, a desperate effort to save jobs in tough times by mandating U.S.-only material in federally financed projects. The protectionist rules have endured and proliferated, particularly since the most recent recession, even as the two NAFTA partners have aggressively pursued free-trade deals elsewhere in the world. U.S.-only content rules now cover everything from subway cars to sewer projects.

Morrison (population: 430) is faced with the expensive choice of ripping up the bridge and removing the beams at a cost of about $30,000, or losing tens of thousands of dollars in badly needed federal cash.

“It’s pretty much a real big mess,” acknowledged Kara Zabilansky, Morrison’s town administrator.

Morrison’s nightmare on the South Park Street Bridge has grown into a minor international incident.

Marcy Grossman, Canada’s consul-general in Denver, complained in an op-ed piece in the Denver Post that U.S. taxpayers are the real losers.

“While the intent of Buy America may sound reasonable, they do not provide the best results for the public taxpayers,” she wrote. “Local content requirements increase costs because there is less competition from which to source products and more money has to be spent to administer and review such requirements.”

U.S. legislators insist they are primarily targeting cheap imports from countries such as China, India and Brazil, not Canada. But because of the highly integrated nature of the North American economy, Canadian manufacturers are often caught in the crossfire.

“Unfortunately, there is probably some collateral damage between the two countries in the short-term,” conceded Barry Zekelman, the Canadian chief executive of Atlas Pipe parent JMC Steel Group, which supplied the beams used in the Morrison bridge.

But Mr. Zekelman, whose Chicago-based company makes steel products on both sides of the border, said he supports Buy America, and would happily endorse similar legislation in Canada if it protects him from “illegally traded” offshore imports.

“In the end, it is a bit foolish,” he said of the protectionist measures. “What we would like to see is some leniency between Canada and the U.S. We’re so close, we’re tied at the hip and so interchangeable.”

The situation could get worse if Canada retaliates in the face of proliferating U.S.-only content rules.

The Canadian Manufacturers and Exporters has been lobbying Ottawa to do just that on major infrastructure projects, such as the $5-billion (Canadian) replacement of Montreal’s Champlain Bridge.

“The kind of situation happening in Colorado should be a wake-up call for the Canadian government to start using their own purchasing power to provide a level playing field for Canadian steel manufacturers,” said Jayson Myers, the CME’s chief executive officer.

Mr. Myers said it is “shocking” that the federal government imposes no restrictions on U.S. steel used in bridges and other large infrastructure projects in this country when Canadian manufacturers are being treated so unfairly by Washington.

At least two Ontario municipalities – Kingston and Halton Hills – passed motions recently calling on governments in Canada to fight back against the spread of Buy America rules. And Mr. Myers said many similar resolutions are expected to follow suit in the coming months.

Back in Morrison, Ms. Zabilansky is dismayed that her bridge is at the centre of a cross-border backlash. “There should be some other type of clause in the Buy America Act to allow Canada and America to work together,” she said.

Ms. Zabilansky still cannot believe the fiasco all stems from the fact that the Canadian value of the steel overshot the $2,500 foreign content exemption allowed in U.S.-funded highway projects by $770 (U.S.) – just enough to make it illegal.


Protectionism, especially the "Buy America Act" sort of protectionism, is stupid; but such legislation is popular with most Americans (and Canadians and Japanese and Norwegians, and, and, and ...) because most people are Stupid and they elect STUPID politicians who believe that the law of unintended consequences doesn't apply to them.

And

http://ottawacitizen.com/news/politics/federal-government-racks-up-nearly-300000-in-cellphone-late-payment-fees
logo-green.png

Federal government racks up nearly $300,000 in cellphone late fees

JASON FEKETE

Published on: September 18, 2014

Hold the phone — the federal government has racked up close to $300,000 in late fees for cellphone services and other wireless devices over the past few years because it never paid its bills on time.

The eye-popping wireless late-payment charges have accumulated as the government insists it is owed $3.5 million in wrongfully charged late fees by telephone companies.

Nearly $70,000 in cellphone late payment fees came in October 2013 alone and another $65,000 from November 2013, according to documents tabled this week in the House of Commons.

The Conservative government has been piling up late-payment fees as it preaches fiscal prudence, cutting billions of dollars in spending and laying off thousands of federal government employees.

“Taxpayers are having to pay more than a quarter of a million dollars because the government didn’t pay its cellphone bills on time and I think that’s outrageous,” said Liberal MP Geoff Regan, who requested the information from the government.

“It’s an outrage that they would flush that money down the toilet because they can’t get their act together when Canadians pay their bills on time and the government can’t.”

More than $280,000 of the late-payment charges since January 2012 were for cellphone services, with thousands of dollars more in late charges for other wireless devices, according to the documents.

Most of the taxpayer-funded late fees since 2012 were incurred by Shared Services Canada, the government’s super-IT department that was created about three years ago and is responsible for telecommunication services.

The majority of the late-payment fees — more than $250,000 worth — were owed to Bell Mobility, although more than a dozen wireless companies all charged late fees to the government.

A spokeswoman for Public Works Minister Diane Finley, who is responsible for Shared Services Canada, said telephone late-payment charges will not be tolerated.

Shared Services Canada has consolidated billing down from 75,000 individual phone bills per month, with nearly 99 per cent of all phone bills now paid on time, said Finley’s spokeswoman Alyson Queen.

Overall, telephone costs have been reduced by $57 million this year alone, she said, although she didn’t provide the total cost of phone bills.

“The late fees costs incurred by SSC last year were unacceptable to Canadian taxpayers and to our government,” Queen said in an emailed statement.

The government has been demanding two telephone companies refund what the government argues is $3.5 million in wrongfully charged late-payment fees.

Shared Services Canada has, however, been able to recoup about $1.25 million since January from nine companies that charged late fees on $300 million worth of contracts.

The department took over the various phone contracts when the government amalgamated its IT services in one place, but it was initially overwhelmed by the 25,000 invoices it received monthly.

Shared Services Canada first noticed last year telephone companies that provided basic services and features such as voicemail and call display were routinely charging and processing late payment fees from the government.

According to a government briefing note obtained by the Citizen, the late fees were assessed “contrary to the terms and conditions of the contracts for these services.”

— With files from Jordan Press, Ottawa Citizen


This is worth a long rant, but ... centralization is not always the right thing, in fact it is, very often, the wrong choice. But, just as there are too many admirals and generals, in too many centralizd, high level bureaucracies, doing work that should be, properly, being done by majors in low level HQs, so are there too many senior civil servants building high level, central functions in Ottawa/Gatineau that are, really, unnecessary when not downright counterproductive. The problem starts with a too highly focused prime minister.
 
It will be interesting to see how they resolve the Buy America regulations when they proceed with the second Windsor / Detroit crossing.
 
We used to pay our cellphone bill with our Mastercard, the bill came directly to us and I or whoever was the manager would sign it and it would get paid right away. Since they went with the "CPC Soviet Central Planning Committee" way of doing things, we never see the bill and it's get taken out of our budget. Now switching to Rogers has certainly saved us lot's of money over Telus. Rogers can offer low rates because their system sucks and they have no agreements with other providers. I frigging hate their service.
 
OK, we know that the 2015 campaign has, officially, moved from intense to goofy when we see this picture, posted by Jennifer Ditchburn (CTV News) on Twitter ...

         
CJW2YniWwAA1nWz.jpg


              ... Ms Ditchburn says, "pic of PMO setting up velvet rope on tundra priceless. Should make @whpresscorps feel not so bad."
 
E.R. Campbell said:
OK, we know that the 2015 campaign has, officially, moved from intense to goofy when we see this picture, posted by Jennifer Ditchburn (CTV News) on Twitter ...

         
CJW2YniWwAA1nWz.jpg


              ... Ms Ditchburn says, "pic of PMO setting up velvet rope on tundra priceless. Should make @whpresscorps feel not so bad."

Absolutely goofy, but how many of us here, with some TI, have seen the military do the same sort of goofy shit on any one of hundreds of situations.

Goofiness is not the sole prevue of the PMO ;)
 
recceguy said:
Goofiness is not the sole prevue of the PMO ;)

For now. Wait to see what happens after the election.

I've heard a rumour that they are planning to legislate that goofiness by anyone without permission from the PMO will be punishable by life imprisonment. And a $10,000 fine. And a harshly worded tweet.
 
Given the late Mr Trudeau's reputation, perhaps we should qualify that as "Pierre Trudeau's last known child"?
 
E.R. Campbell said:
Well, maybe not light in the minds of Misses Coyne and May, but it's a bit odd that longtime über-Liberal Deborah Coyne (how much more Liberal can you get than giving birth to Pierre Trudeau's last child?) will be the Green Party's candidate in the new West-end Ottawa riding of Carleton.

may-coyne.jpg

Elizabeth May and Deborah Coyne

Elizabeth May: The West Coast's gift to constitutional irrelevance and general tinfoil hattery. Thanks for reminding me, eh?  :facepalm:
 
A quick perusal of LinkedIn suggests that the apple has fallen far from the tree: Deborah Coyne's daughter appears to be a private equity associate with KKR. Details in her LinkedIn bio (https://www.linkedin.com/pub/sarah-coyne/22/aa1/3a7) are consistent with those published by The Star five years ago (http://www.thestar.com/news/world/2010/11/24/pierre_trudeaus_daughter_sarah_lives_under_the_radar.html)
 
Put bunny ears on them and they're just about ready for the coop....... :2c:
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top