• Thanks for stopping by. Logging in to a registered account will remove all generic ads. Please reach out with any questions or concerns.

Pan-Islamic merged mega thread

Watched a PBS Frontline documentary on how ISIS has taken hundreds of Yazidi women and children and forcing them into slavery, with numbers in the range of 4 of every 5 being raped. Their belief that girls as young as 9 years old can be used as sex slaves.

It's a disturbing story, with many first person interviews of victims who escaped their captors. The main focus of the story is of one Yazidi man who has developed a ring of contacts and volunteers who aid in the escape of these women and children.

These guys are just pure savage animals that need to be put down. There is no other way to describe it.

http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/escaping-isis/

And NPR interview with the film maker

http://www.npr.org/2015/07/14/422800624/in-escaping-isis-an-underground-railroad-forms-to-save-yazidi-women

RENEE MONTAGNE, HOST:

Until a year ago, few had heard of the Yazidi people of northern Iraq. But with the rise of the self-proclaimed Islamic State, the plight of this isolated ethnic group has become headline news. The Yazidi practice their own ancient form of religion rather than Islam, and that's made them a prime target of ISIS militants. Yazidi men have been slaughtered, and thousands of women and children have been carried away from mountain towns as slaves of war. That's the subject of a new PBS "Frontline" documentary. Directed by Edward Watts, the film uncovers the existence of what was long believed to be only a rumor - an underground railroad for Yazidi slaves.

Welcome to the program.

EDWARD WATTS: Thank you.

MONTAGNE: Your story is the story, really, in a sense, of one man on a mission. He's a Yazidi man who's taken it upon himself to free these Yazidi women and girls. Tell us about him.

WATTS: So Khalil al-Dakhi is one of a very small group of activists. There are about six or seven of these guys who are trying to rescue the captured Yazidi women and children. Prior to the war, he'd just been a small-town lawyer dealing with marriages, divorces, deaths - those kind of things. But in the aftermath of this cataclysm that hit their community, he began to gather testimony, firstly of people who had suffered from the simple military attack. And then as some of the women and children managed to escape from the clutches of ISIS, he began to gather the testimony of what they'd been through in the hope, I think, that there would eventually be possibly even a war crimes trial. And what he realized looking at this testimony was that the women were coming back with extraordinarily detailed information about the disposition of the Islamic State - so where there were checkpoints, where there were sort of fortified headquarters and, most importantly for him, where the Yazidi hostages were being held. That, in a sense, could provide a blueprint for a way in which he could rescue people from inside.

MONTAGNE: Well, one of the elements of this system is, kind of amazingly, some of these women managed to hide cell phones and call out. Let's play a clip of the film where you hear one of those voicemails that he would've been hearing.

(SOUNDBITE OF DOCUMENTARY, "ESCAPING ISIS")

UNIDENTIFIED WOMAN: (Foreign language spoken).

MONTAGNE: What is that? What's going on there?

WATTS: This was a rather unusual case in that an ISIS fighter himself had called up the rescue team and said, well, you can buy these women and children off me, if you'd like. And in order to put the pressure on, in this case, he played a clip of this woman who is in his grasp to essentially - you know, you can hear the desperation in her voice. She was just desperately trying to appeal to the people to do whatever it would take to save her from that situation.

MONTAGNE: Well, let's get to that a little bit, briefly - ransom. Now, right off, Khalil claims he does not pay ransoms, but clearly some money is flowing in these situations.

WATTS: Yeah, I mean the majority of the money is going to the people who are actually involved in doing the rescues. So some people, I was told, they're doing it for free because of simple humanitarian reasons. Others are doing it because of poverty. There was one case they told me about a shepherd who was instrumental in guiding certain families through remote areas. And he literally just needed a few hundred dollars to feed his family, and that's why he was doing it. So there is money flowing around, but they are really adamant that they don't pay ISIS directly because they hate ISIS. And whenever I ask them this question, as I did repeatedly - I mean, ISIS set traps for them. There was actually just a case just a few weeks ago of two of Khalil's guys. ISIS set an ambush for them. And what they did was a similar phone call to the one you just heard. They got a girl to call the rescue network saying her captor was away at the frontline and therefore, she was, in a sense, in a position to be rescued. They sent two of their guys in. ISIS were waiting for them, captured them and executed them.

MONTAGNE: Well, there is much in this about what is happening, even as we speak, to women who have not been rescued. But amazingly, one of the harder things to watch is a little video that Khalil shows you...

WATTS: Yeah.

MONTAGNE: ...About the ISIS fighters making crude jokes and laughing about buying and selling what they call sabia. That is slaves captured in war, sex slaves.

(SOUNDBITE OF DOCUMENTARY, "ESCAPING ISIS")

UNIDENTIFIED MAN: (Foreign language spoken).

WATTS: Yeah - no, I mean this - that is an extraordinary clip. And actually a girl who had escaped had stolen the phone, and so the world was able to see this quite intimate scene amongst ISIS fighters. Unlike most of their output, this was not intended for public consumption. I think it just really gives you an idea of the callous brutality with which they were treating these very young and fragile and vulnerable women and girls because for them, they were slaves, and slaves could be bought and sold and treated entirely as they pleased.

MONTAGNE: Well, some of it is actually too sensitive for us to even talk about this morning on the air.

WATTS: Yeah.

MONTAGNE: But let's play just a few moments of Amal just to hear her voice. She's 18 and sadly telling a story that seems to be universal.

(SOUNDBITE OF DOCUMENTARY, "ESCAPING ISIS")

AMAL: (Foreign language spoken).

WATTS: Yeah. I mean, what you're hearing there is the beginning of this most horrendous tale of sexual violence that I've ever heard.

She was initially placed under custody of a single ISIS commander who had six bodyguards. And not wanting to get into too much graphic detail for your listeners, but gradually through the course of her captivity with him, she was subjected to attacks by all of those men at different times and sometimes simultaneously, and then she was passed on to other fighters. And another little girl was bought and sold, and I'd asked her whether this was the case with her. And she said, no, I was just rented. The Yazidi culture is highly, highly conservative - no discussion of sex or anything of that nature. And these women - girls have been ripped out of that environment and subjected to this sexual violence.

MONTAGNE: And, though, you show the ends of rescues. It's pretty extraordinary footage. Families obviously want them back.

WATTS: This is a big thing, I mean, because in Yazidi society, it used to be so conservative. And we're only talking about a few years ago. If a single Yazidi woman ran off with a Muslim man, you know, she could be liable to an honor killing. But now so many of their community have been abducted and subjected to this sexual violence that, as a society really, they're having to massively sea change their whole conservative nature. And their religious leaders have actually been at the forefront of this from very early on in the process saying we have to welcome our girls back. We need to do whatever it takes to reintegrate them and make them feel at home once again in our community. And I think that certainly that what I saw was that the community were very much responding to those calls.

MONTAGNE: Well, thank you very much for joining us.

WATTS: Good to talk to you, thank you.

MONTAGNE: Edward Watts directed the documentary "Escaping ISIS". It premieres tonight on PBS's "Frontline."
 
The use and abuse of social media is something we will need to become better at identifying, monitoring and countering. While ISIS is perhaps the chief proponents right now, we should remember Russia ran an effective campaign in Georgia and Crimea, and the Chinese also have huge resources devoted to social media as well:

http://www.the-american-interest.com/2015/07/19/140-characters-of-jihad/

140 Characters of Jihad

In the age when terrorists can recruit followers from halfway around the world, a question looms over social media companies: how to deal with content posted by jihadi groups. From WashPo:

As the Islamic State, also known as ISIS and ISIL, continues to hold large parts of Iraq and Syria and inspire terrorist attacks in more and more countries, it has come to rely upon U.S. social-media companies to summon fresh recruits to its cause, spread its propaganda and call for attacks, according to counterterrorism analysts. […]

“ISIS has been confronting us with these really inhumane and atrocious images, and there are some people who believe if you type ‘jihad’ or ‘ISIS’ on YouTube, you should get no results,” Victoria Grand, Google’s director of policy strategy, told The Washington Post in a recent interview. “We don’t believe that should be the case. Actually, a lot of the results you see on YouTube are educational about the origins of the group, educating people about the dangers and violence. But the goal here is how do you strike a balance between enabling people to discuss and access information about ISIS, but also not become the distribution channel for their propaganda?”
Striking a proper balance is an elusive task indeed. Even if there were a clear line of demarkation between “good” and “bad” content, technological shortfalls make it “difficult to distinguish between communiques from terrorist groups and posts by news organizations and legitimate users.”

A recent feature in our magazine’s pages addressed this issue, arguing that it’s high time the Western world takes aggressive action to expel such content from its servers and social media sites. James van de Velde asserts that “[w]ithout contesting extremist use of the internet, the United States and its allies will fail to defeat the Islamic State and to eliminate al-Qaeda, both of which are, let us remember, the stated goals of U.S. policy.” Furthermore, shutting down those sites and accounts isn’t a useless game of whack-a-mole—it can do significant damage to jihadi web presence and slow their operations down. The piece, which can be found here, is worth reading in full—this issue isn’t going away.
 
I watched those PBS episode's of Frontline, containing two episodes one is a split with Ukraine. What is intriguing about the state of affairs; in the affected Middle East is the modern day G8 countries, and a lack of action to act upon genocide. The anticipation to help people in severe distress is so great that non militarised citizens are going to help. ISIS will not stop at anything, so we have to act and stop this from being the next holocaust.
 
milnews.ca said:
While the old Cracked magazine may be better known for satire, it now appears to be doing more (in their own smart-*** way) news & pop culture coverage.  Sweary words aside, here's a pretty easy-to-understand piece on how ISIS came to be.More on Camp Bucca & ISIS, in more mainstream media language, here, here and here.

Well there is a solution, but international law would get in the way.
 
Well, it looks like Turkey has decided to allow airstrikes to be run from Incerlik. I wonder how much influence the recent suicide bombing, and the report I heard earlier today of the killing of a Turkish soldier on the border by possible ISIS troops.

Turkey Agrees To Allow Use Of Its Soil For Airstrikes Against ISIS

http://www.npr.org/sections/thetwo-way/2015/07/23/425666624/turkey-agrees-to-allow-its-soil-for-airstrikes-against-isis?utm_source=facebook.com&utm_medium=social&utm_campaign=npr&utm_term=nprnews&utm_content=20150723

Updated at 5:35 p.m. ET

Turkey has agreed to allow anti-ISIS coalition warplanes to begin using the air base at Incirlik in the country's east to carry out airstrikes against the extremist group in neighboring Syria, NPR has confirmed.

The news, also reported in The Wall Street Journal and elsewhere, marks a sudden shift in Ankara's policy that until now has barred the U.S. and its allies from using the base for anything other than unarmed surveillance drones directed against the self-declared Islamic State.

"The United States and Turkey have held ongoing consultations about ways we can further our joint counter-ISIL efforts," National Security Council spokesman Alistair Baskey tells NPR's Brian Naylor, referring to an acronym that the administration uses for the Islamic State.

"We have decided to further deepen our cooperation in the fight against ISIL, our common efforts to promote security and stability in Iraq, and our work to bring about a political settlement to the conflict in Syria," Baskey says. "Due to operational security I don't have further details to share at this time."

According to The Associated Press, President Obama and Turkish Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdogan discussed the agreement by telephone on Wednesday.

The AP says:

"Turkey has yet to publicly confirm the agreement, and the U.S. officials requested anonymity because they weren't authorized to comment publicly. The White House declined to confirm the agreement, citing operational security concerns, but White House spokesman Josh Earnest said Obama and Erdogan had discussed efforts to fight IS during their phone call Wednesday.
"'The two leaders did agree that we would deepen our cooperation as we take on this ISIL threat,' Josh Earnest said, using an alternative acronym for the militant group."

The WSJ reports:

"Use of the base is part of a broader deal between the U.S. and Turkey to deepen their cooperation in the fight against Islamic State, which is growing increasingly perilous for Turkey.

"The agreement comes after months of tense negotiations between U.S. officials seeking greater freedom to strike the extremist forces and reluctant Turkish leaders who have resisted American pressure to play a larger role in the fight across the border."
 
More from WaPo, including the engagement between Turkish troops and ISIS.

Turkey agrees to allow U.S. military to use its base to attack Islamic State

https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/middle_east/turkey-agrees-to-allow-us-military-to-use-its-base-to-attack-islamic-state/2015/07/23/317f23aa-3164-11e5-a879-213078d03dd3_story.html?hpid=z1

BEIRUT — Turkey has agreed to allow the United States to use Turkish soil to launch air attacks against the Islamic State, signaling a major shift in policy on the part of the once-reluctant American ally, U.S. officials said Thursday.

The decision to allow U.S. warplanes to use the Incirlik air base in southern Turkey is one element in a broad cooperation plan first broached nine months ago. Additional elements, including expansion of U.S. airstrikes into the western part of the border area, and the use of Turkish military ground spotters to guide them, are still being discussed and finalized.

Turkey had resisted being drawn too deeply into the war against the Islamic State because of concerns about the direction of the Obama administration’s Syria policy.

The Incirlik agreement was sealed in a telephone conversation Wednesday between President Obama and Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan, a senior U.S. administration official said, speaking on condition of anonymity to discuss sensitive information.

A White House statement said only that the two leaders had discussed “deepening our ongoing cooperation in the fight against ISIL, as well as common efforts to bring security and stability to Iraq and a political settlement to the conflict in Syria.” The Islamic State is also known as ISIS and ISIL.

Use of the Incirlik base , located just 60 miles from the northwest Syrian border, would enable piloted U.S. warplanes and armed drones to move more quickly and efficiently against Islamic State targets in their northern Syrian strongholds, U.S. officials have said. Planes currently fly from Iraq, to Syria’s east, and from Arab states such as Jordan and in the Persian Gulf that are a part of the anti-Islamic State coalition.

Survillance aircraft have been permitted to fly from Incirlik, but the Turkish government’s refusal to allow the base to be used for air attacks had triggered one of the deepest rifts in the U.S.-Turkish alliance in more than a decade, reflecting deep-seated policy differences between Ankara and Washington over ways to address the Syrian war. Incirlik has hosted American forces under the umbrella of the NATO alliance for many years, but it remains subject to Turkish sovereignty.

There was no immediate comment from Turkish officials, although several Turkish media outlets reported the Incirlik agreement. In a Wednesday press conference, Deputy Foreign Mnister Bulent Arinc said that Turkey had “agreed on certain topics to support the [anti-Islamic State] coalition’s efforts during a recent meeting with the U.S. special representative,” a reference to retired Gen. John Allen, the administration’s coordinator for the coalition, who visted Turkey earlier this month.

“A unanimity of thought and action has been reached about the issue of joint operations in the future,” Arinc said, according to the Hurriyet newspaper. “A related cabinet motion is now open for a signature.”

The newspaper quoted an unidentified U.S. official as saying that American strike operations from Incirlik would begin in August.

The agreement was reached amid heightened tensions on the Turkish-Syrian border. In their first significant ground engagement with the Islamic State, Turkish troops on Thursday fired artillery into miltant territory near the Kilis border crossing, killing two fighters. The move followed what Turkish media reports said was an Islamic State attack on Turkish troops in the area that killed at least one Turkish soldier.

The shooting erupted after Turkey sought to prevent militant fighters from entering its territory illegally via one of the many smuggling routes used to ferry goods, supplies and people in and out of Syria, Turkish media said. The Turkish military said in a statement that it scrambled four F-16 fighters to the area to guard against a possible escalation.

The U.S.-Turkish talks had already picked up speed in recent weeks as the Islamic State increased its presence in northwestern Syria, moving beyond its strongholds in the eastern and central parts of the country in the direction of Aleppo, Syria’s largest city.

Fighting in the northwest and in and around Aleppo has been primarily between Syrian opposition fighters and forces of President Bashar al-Assad’s government, and the United States has been reluctant to use its air power, which it has said is solely devoted to the fight against the Islamic State.

Under the plan currently being discussed, U.S. airstrikes could extend from Kobane, a Syrian town on the Turkish border, westward to the town of Azaz, about 20 miles north of Aleppo.

Whether Turkey has secured any concessions from the United States regarding its own concerns was not immediately clear. Turkey has repeatedly said it wants Washington to focus as much on removing Assad as on fighting the Islamic State. It has also said it wants a safe zone in the area, protected by air power, that would allow it to transfer back to Syria some of an estimated 2 million refugees on Turkish territory.

It was unclear whether the U.S.-Turkey arrangement under discussion would recognize any safe zone, but increased control of the 560-mile border would enhance efforts to prevent Islamist militants from crossing into Syria.

Significant gains by Syrian Kurds against the Islamic State in northern Syria to the east of Kobane have also contributed to the evolution of Turkey’s thinking. In recent weeks the Syrian Kurdish People’s Protection Units, or YPG, have seized large swathes of territory, consolidating Kurdish control over what Turkey fears represents the early outlines of a new Kurdish state.

The Kurdish advances have been aided by U.S. airstrikes, leaving Turkey at risk of losing out all along the border.

By aligning more closely with the U.S.-led coalition, Turkey may be seeking to forestall further Kurdish gains in the eastern border region and secure more robust support for the Syrian rebels in the west than would have been possible had it remained on the sidelines of the fight.
 
Is a future Kurdistan less likely now that Turkey is directly involved in Syria, on the pretext of joining the War against ISIS?

Associated Press

Turkey military onslaught against Kurds, after IS assaults, raises anger in Kurdish heartland
The Canadian Press
By Desmond Butler And Suzan Fraser, The Associated Press
DIYARBAKIR, Turkey - Just when it seemed Turkey was getting serious about the fight against IS, it has turned its military focus to pounding its old foe: the Kurdish rebels.
In Turkey's Kurdish heartland, the government's renewed military onslaught against the rebels has left many people crying treachery — with suspicions rife that Turkey used a brief offensive against IS as a cover to launch a broad attack against the Kurdistan Workers Party, or PKK. Many Kurds also are venting frustration against the United States, accusing Washington of turning a blind eye to Turkish attacks on the Kurds in exchange for logistical support on IS.
"We are used to this. Kurds have witnessed betrayal for centuries" said Axin Bro, a musician. "National powers use us for their own ends."
The U.S. had welcomed Turkey's air assault last week on the Islamic State group, along with its decision to open air bases for American sorties, as a sign that Turkey had dropped its reluctance to fight the extremist group. Since then, Turkish jets taking off from this city in Kurdish-dominated lands have been hitting PKK targets in northern Iraq and southeastern Turkey, as the militant group has targeted military and police in Turkey.

(...SNIPPED)
 
The Turks supported IS vs Assad.After losing the recent elections the government is trying to woo conservatives back by attacking IS and the Kurds for good measure.
 
KAL, in The Economist, gets it about right ...

         
11822500_10153500377294060_5944595559392549666_n.png

          Source: http://www.economist.com/news/world-week/21660187-kals-cartoon?fsrc=scn/fb/wl/kal/st/aug1st
 
Meanwhile in Yemen, Saudi boots are on the ground in Yemen, with the support of Emirati Le Clerc tanks:

Defense News

Saudi-led Coalition Deploys 3,000 Troops in Yemen, Sources Say

DUBAI — The Saudi-led Arab coalition has deployed 3,000 troops in Aden and main battle tanks, according to sources in Yemen.

Images have appeared over the past hour on Twitter from a number of Yemeni media outlets showing United Arab Emirates LeClerc main battle tanks, BMP armored vehicle, including M-ATVs, being offloaded on to a port in Aden.

(...SNIPPED)
 
For the first time, U.S. launches armed flights over Syria from Turkish base

https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/national-security/for-the-first-time-us-launches-armed-flights-over-syria-from-turkish-base/2015/08/03/9ceceebe-3a11-11e5-b3ac-8a79bc44e5e2_story.html?hpid=z4

The U.S. military has begun flying armed aircraft over Syria from Turkey, the Pentagon said Monday, a move that could expand its ability to carry out airstrikes to protect U.S.-trained rebels in northern Syria.

Capt. Jeff Davis, a Pentagon spokesman, said that military officials had launched armed drones from Incirlik air base in southern Turkey over the weekend. Previously, Ankara had permitted the United States to use the base only to conduct surveillance flights over Syria.

“At this point, no actual strikes have been conducted, but they have begun flying armed,” Davis told reporters at the Pentagon. He said U.S. pilots would begin armed flights over Syria from the base as well.

A U.S. military official, speaking on the condition of anonymity to discuss operational planning, said the new flights from Incirlik, not far from northwest Syria, would increase the time that American aircraft could spend in Syrian airspace, collecting intelligence or dropping munitions.

“It’s proximity and it’s on-station duration, and it’s ability to respond in a timely manner,” the official said.

Last month’s agreement to expand U.S. operations out of the base is just one element of expanded U.S.-Turkish cooperation against the Islamic State, the extremist group that controls much of Iraq and Syria and that Ankara increasingly sees as a direct threat.

The two countries have also agreed to establish a de facto safe zone in northern Syria, which is intended to provide Turkey with a buffer from Syria’s civil war and create an area for displaced Syrians to take shelter from the brutal extremist group.

The Obama administration’s plans for standing up a new force to fight the Islamic State in Syria were dealt a blow last week when al-Qaeda’s Syrian affiliate, Jabhat al-Nusra, claimed to have captured the leader of Division 30, an opposition unit that has sent some of its members to Turkey to be trained by U.S. forces.

On Friday, U.S. aircraft took the unusual step of conducting strikes against fighters from Jabhat al-Nusra, which had reportedly attacked the U.S.-backed unit. The strikes signaled a shift in policy for the Obama administration, which had resisted committing to using air power to protect the U.S. trainees, known as the New Syrian Force, from anyone other than the Islamic State.

Over the weekend, military officials said the new authorization extended to the use of American aircraft to shield fighters from attacks by the forces of Syrian President Bashar al-Assad, which have used chemical weapons and barrel bombs against opponents. The move marks a potential escalation for the United States four years into the Syrian conflict, creating the prospect of a direct U.S. engagement with Assad’s forces.


The authorization against Assad forces was first reported by the Wall Street Journal.

Military officials played down that scenario Monday, saying that a confrontation with Assad’s units is unlikely in large part because the United States has sent members of the New Syrian Force — who number only about 55 so far — into areas not contested by the government.

“It’s important to remember that’s not what this is about,” Davis said. “We’re not at war with the Assad regime. The people who we are training and equipping are pledged to fight ISIL and only ISIL.” ISIL is another name for the Islamic State.

U.S. officials also believe that Assad’s power to strike out against U.S.-backed fighters is diminished. Assad recently made a rare public admission that his government had lost ground and was struggling to maintain a large enough force to hold off adversaries.

The recent attacks by Jabhat al-Nusra underscore the vulnerability of U.S.-trained forces in Syria and highlight the obstacles that military officials must overcome if the program, which began training cadets after a long buildup this spring, can succeed.

“Train and equip as currently construed is going to have a very, very difficult time meeting any of its objectives in terms of manpower,” said Fred Hof, a former U.S. official who is a senior fellow at the Atlantic Council.

Part of the reason that the number of trainees has been so low is that the United States has struggled to find Syrians, after four years of bloody battles, who will agree to fight only the Islamic State and not the Assad regime.

Military officials are pushing forward with the program, which aims to eventually establish training sites in Jordan, Saudi Arabia and Qatar.

More Syrians are being trained. Defense officials have declined to specify the size of the next cohort but concede it is not large. They say the intense vetting that has suppressed numbers is necessary to avoid arming the wrong people.

Hof said the program could have negligible impact unless it changes course.


“It could be that when we look at this . . . we may see it was absolutely the emptiest of gestures,” Hof said. “If it continues in its present form, that’s exactly the conclusion we’re going to reach.”
 
Meanwhile back to the Yemen Civil War...

So who's enforcing this...the Saudi Navy?

Reuters

Diversion of aid ships in Yemen spreads fear of shortages
Wed Aug 5, 2015 5:26pm EDT

SANAA/ADEN (Reuters) - Residents in the Yemeni capital Sanaa are stocking up on rare food and fuel supplies after the government in exile decided to divert aid ships from the Houthi rebel-held north to loyalist areas farther south.

Sources in Yemen's government confirmed the move, though there has been no official announcement, and Yemen's exiled information minister said on Tuesday that commercial flights would be diverted from the capital to the southern port of Aden.

The decisions come as southern fighters backed by weapons and air strikes by neighboring Gulf states have made rapid gains on southern battlefields against the Iran-allied Houthis.

(...SNIPPED)

BBC

Yemen war: Does capture of air base mark a turning point?
By Michael Stephens
Royal United Services Institute (Rusi), Doha

The retaking of a key air base to the north of the southern city of Aden is a major strategic victory for the Yemeni government in its fight against the Houthi-led insurgency.
The al-Anad air base is important for a number of reasons, and if secured in the long run will provide an important logistical staging post for rearmament and resupply for pro-government forces pushing north towards the cities of Taiz and Ibb, as well as supporting operations toward the south-western coastline.
Secondly it controls the main road into Aden, preventing the Houthis from pushing south back towards the city.

(...SNIPPED)

 
The UAE is providing armoured units including the Leclarc

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Pd5t28HkLqk

 
jollyjacktar said:
Some blow back from playing in Yemen?
Not blow-back from Yemen, but another element of the pan-Islamic civil war ... a manifestation of extremists' efforts to spread and increase the violence.

Gulf Arab states face twin terror threats
By Frank Gardner BBC security correspondent
03 Aug 2015

If Gulf Arab foreign ministers tell US Secretary of State John Kerry their full list of fears this week then he may need to extend his current visit to Doha. Because the list is growing longer almost by the day.

Qatar's Foreign Minister Khalid al-Attiya set the tone of the Gulf Co-operation Council's Foreign Ministers' meeting with his opening words, saying it was being held in "very exceptional circumstances and challenges that have been unprecedented".

The main topic of Monday's talks has been the US effort to allay Arab concerns over the 14 July nuclear deal with Iran.

Saudi Arabia and its closest allies fear that the deal will make it more, not less, likely, that Tehran will eventually build a nuclear bomb.

They also suspect that with up to $150bn (£96bn) of newly-unfrozen funds, Iran's more extremist elements will step up their support for militant Shia groups around the region.

A separate trilateral meeting between the US, Russian and Saudi foreign ministers has been focusing on Syria.

But Gulf Arab governments also have mounting security concerns closer to home.

Despite being the most prosperous and stable part of the Arab world, the six Gulf Arab states now find themselves facing a twin threat of domestic terrorist attacks from two ideologically opposed foes: Sunni and Shia extremists.

'Promoting violent unrest'

In late July, Bahrain suffered one of the most serious attacks on its police force. An improvised bomb ambushed a police convoy, killing two officers and injuring others.

Investigators say the explosive used was of military quality and similar to explosives the authorities say have been intercepted coming from Iran.

They believe this latest device came from Shia militants in Iraq, funded and trained by Iran's Revolutionary Guard Corps.

Bahrain has long accused Iran - and specifically elements of its intelligence security apparatus - of promoting violent unrest in the island state.

Opposition figures say the government has often talked up this threat as a pretext for cracking down on protests and stifling any challenge to the Sunni monarchy by the Shia, who form a majority of the indigenous population.

But Western diplomats share Bahrain's concerns, following a number of recent discoveries of explosives and weapons coming in by sea and over the causeway from Saudi Arabia, that Bahrain is being targeted by violent Shia extremists outside the country.

Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates are also highly suspicious of Iran's activities in the region, which is why their armed forces have been actively helping Yemeni troops push the allegedly Iranian-backed Houthi rebels out of Aden.

Murdered in their mosques

But the deadliest terrorist threat in the Gulf right now comes from the Sunni jihadists of so-called Islamic State (IS).

In the space of five weeks this summer the Najd Province group, an IS affiliate, carried out three suicide bombings - two in Saudi Arabia and one in Kuwait.

In all, 52 people were killed and hundreds injured. In each case the targets were Shia Muslims, murdered in their mosques as they attended Friday prayers. The jihadists of IS consider the Shia to be heretics.

Analysts believe the aim of these bombings is to provoke a violent response from the Shia, setting off a sectarian conflict that will recruit more of the Gulf's Sunni citizens into the ranks of IS.

After hitting Saudi Arabia and Kuwait, experts believe Bahrain is the next likely target.

The numbers of IS supporters in the Gulf is disturbingly high and probably far greater than official figures suggest.

In July the Saudi authorities announced they had arrested 431 suspected IS members, on top of a further 93 announced in April.

Aymen Deen, the former al-Qaeda operative and expert on IS, believes there has been a recent change of strategy by the militant group.

He says that rather than encouraging Gulf Arab supporters to come to Syria, the IS leadership is now telling them to remain in their own countries to plan attacks there, on the authorities, on the Shia and on Westerners.
http://www.bbc.com/news/world-middle-east-33763566
 
Mass murder/Atrocity Inc. on the loose again:

Reuters

Islamic State executed 2,000 Iraqis in Nineveh: defense minister
Fri Aug 7, 2015 3:38pm EDT

BAGHDAD (Reuters) - More than two thousand Iraqis in the northern province of Nineveh have been executed by Islamic State militants controlling the area, the defense minister said on Friday in a recorded statement.

Ministry officials could not confirm when or how the deaths had occurred and Reuters was unable to immediately confirm the government's claims.

Access is severely restricted in large parts of Iraq's north and west, which Islamic State militants have controlled since sweeping across the Syrian border in mid-2014 in a bid to establish a modern caliphate.

(...SNIPPED)
 
Meanwhile in Yemen, the Saudi-led coalition ground forces are taking casualties:

Reuters

Anti-Houthi forces take strategic city in Yemen, Emirati troops killed
Sat Aug 8, 2015 3:06pm EDT

ADEN/DUBAI (Reuters) - Fighters backed by an Arab military coalition seized the key city of Zinjibar in southern Yemen on Saturday, residents and militia sources said, dealing another major blow to the dominant Houthi group.

The capital city of Abyan province on the Arabian Sea had been a major focus of forces battling the Iranian-allied Houthis. It is the fourth regional capital they have won since taking control of the port of Aden last month.

Three soldiers from the United Arab Emirates were reported killed while taking part in the Saudi-led military campaign against the Houthis, UAE state news agency WAM said on Saturday.

Southern militia sources said they had been killed by landmines planted by the Houthis while entering Zinjibar.

(...SNIPPED)
 
Meanwhile, reinforcements arrive at Incirlik AFB:

Reuters

U.S. sends six jets, 300 personnel to Turkey base in Islamic State fight
Sun Aug 9, 2015 3:05pm EDT

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - The United States sent six F-16 jets and about 300 personnel to Incirlik Air Base in Turkey on Sunday, the U.S. military said, after Ankara agreed last month to allow American planes to launch air strikes against Islamic State militants from there.

The Pentagon said in a statement the "small detachment" is from the 31st Fighter Wing based at Aviano Air Base, Italy. Support equipment was also sent but no details were provided.

"The United States and Turkey, as members of the 60-plus nation coalition, are committed to the fight against ISIL in the pursuit of peace and stability in the region," the statement said, using an acronym for Islamic State.

(...SNIPPED)
 
The Turkish pounding of the Kurds on both sides of their border with Syria continues:

Reuters

Turkish air strikes hit 17 Kurdish militant targets, military says
Tue Aug 11, 2015 8:45am EDT
By Ece Toksabay and and Seymus Cakan

ANKARA/DIYARBAKIR (Reuters) - Turkish warplanes hit 17 Kurdish militant targets in the southeastern province of Hakkari on Monday and Tuesday, the military said, as it ratchets up an offensive against the insurgents.

Turkey has been buffeted by increased fighting between its military and the outlawed Kurdistan People's Party (PKK), which has waged a three-decade insurgency for greater Kurdish autonomy.

On Tuesday, the PKK claimed responsibility for Monday's bombing of an Istanbul police station in which four people died, three of them attackers. The bombing was one of a wave of attacks on Turkish security forces that have killed at least nine people.

(...SNIPPED)
 
A truce in Syria between Sunni forces (ISIS, Al-Nusra), pro-Shia forces (Iran, Hezbollah, Assad forces) and western-backed forces (Syrian Kurds, moderate US trained Sunni rebels)?

Reuters

Turkey, Iran help broker rare truce in Syria
Wed Aug 12, 2015 9:51am EDT

By Mariam Karouny and Tom Perry

BEIRUT (Reuters) - Syria's warring parties declared a 48-hour ceasefire in two frontline areas on Wednesday after unprecedented mediation from Turkey and Iran, signaling a new approach by some of the main regional backers of the opposing sides.

The ceasefire halted fighting between insurgents on the one hand, and the army and its Lebanese militant Hezbollah allies on the other, in the rebel-held town of Zabadani and in a pair of Shi'ite Muslim villages in Idlib province.

The two areas are strongholds of each side under ferocious attack by the other. Sources familiar with the talks, which have been under way for weeks, said the truce could be extended to give time for ongoing negotiations aimed at evacuating civilians and combatants.

(...SNIPPED)



 
Back
Top