• Thanks for stopping by. Logging in to a registered account will remove all generic ads. Please reach out with any questions or concerns.

Justin Trudeau hints at boosting Canada’s military spending

As one who is in the Boomer Die Off class, Bite Me! Get a job, save , invest for about 40 yrs then we'll talk (maybe)

Eat Protein Bar GIF by SnickersUK
 
As one who is in the Boomer Die Off class, Bite Me! Get a job, save , invest for about 40 yrs then we'll talk (maybe)

Yes it's that easy. You are clearly unaware of current salaries and cost of housing in this country. 🤦‍♂️ I'm doing exactly what my parents did in the mid 90's, I have a good job, I'm saving and investing. No way in hell I'll accumulate the amount of wealth they did. Good thing for inheritances, not everyone is that lucky.

Another thread successfully derailed!
 
Yes it's that easy. You are clearly unaware of current salaries and cost of housing in this country. 🤦‍♂️ I'm doing exactly what my parents did in the mid 90's, I have a good job, I'm saving and investing. No way in hell I'll accumulate the amount of wealth they did. Good thing for inheritances, not everyone is that lucky.

Another thread successfully derailed!
take a lesson from the Kazakhstani's. The youngest son stays in the family home to look after the parents and raises his family there. The family works together to raise the necessary money for the older siblings to purchase their own home and move out. They start when the children are young. They work together as a family unit.
 
High price-to-income ratios for housing are not synonymous with making wealth accumulation more difficult. I think it probable that wealth accumulation has become easier. Improved technologies and innovative engineering have made many routine daily activities easier (more productive, less time-consuming), and for the same reasons made many basic goods/services less expensive. A person wishing to compare circumstances to a previous generation should live as they did - same quality of accommodations, same quality of food, same quality and quantity of clothing, same number of cars, same infrequency of dining out and other leisure expenditures, etc, etc. I am confident that one would live much more cheaply that way.

Then the income not spent could be invested, and there are many more investment options with better net returns than were available to previous generations.
 
take a lesson from the Kazakhstani's. The youngest son stays in the family home to look after the parents and raises his family there. The family works together to raise the necessary money for the older siblings to purchase their own home and move out. They start when the children are young. They work together as a family unit.

My grandmother lived with us growing up and I'm sure my mom will eventually move in with us, probably in a larger house. It's pretty much the status-quo for Eastern European cultures.
 
Those are the spitting image of what we're in.
Never lived in a house until we bought one of these on Collegiate St, Wpg in the 70's. Paid $10,500.
Two bedrooms, no basement, oil heater in the floor outside the bathroom. Located near the airport runway, thus house shook. One time, on the roof adjusting the TV antenna, a 747 was landing overhead.
 
crap Pardon my french but schools have been open to all for over a century. My grandmother was the educated one whilst my grandfather had grade 8. Reasons: the Catholic church no longer has the influence it once did, women are working so less time to raise a family, the cost of a home is keeping many working without hope of starting a family, marriage itself is under threat as society has adopted a totally self-centred approach to life so if your significant other (hate that term) doesn't suit, find another. That approach to family doesn't leave space for kids. Rant off.
By education, I'm talking about post-secondary education for women in the 'western society' and completed high school for the rest of the world


In a nutshell, data show that the higher the level of a woman’s educational attainment, the fewer children she is likely to bear.
In Ghana, women with a high school education have a TFR (Total Fertility Rate) between 2 and 3, whereas those with no education have a TFR of about 6, even as recently as 2008. Similarly, women with a high school education in Ethiopia have a TFR of 1.3.

In considering whether female education actually drives a decline in the TFR, one might ask whether the opposite is true – do women who prefer smaller families want to study longer? However, the evidence from sub-Saharan Africa clearly supports the causal role of female education in fertility decline. For example, an education reform in Kenya that increased the length of primary education by a year resulted in increased female educational attainment, and delayed marriage and fertility. One randomized control trial found that reducing the cost of school uniforms in Kenya not only reduced dropout rates, but also reduced teenage marriage and childbearing. Another study found that increasing female education by one year in Nigeria reduced early fertility by 0.26 births.

A forthcoming study (Pradhan and Canning 2013) of education and fertility in Ethiopia estimated that an additional year of schooling in Ethiopia would lead to a 7 percentage point reduction in the probability of teenage birth and a 6 percentage point decrease in the probability of marriage. These are large effects, suggesting that women with eight years of schooling would have a fertility rate 53 percentage points lower than those with no schooling at all, and are consistent with observed data.

Why does female education have a direct effect on fertility? The economic theory of fertility suggests an incentive effect: more educated women have higher opportunity costs of bearing children in terms of lost income. The household bargaining model suggests that more educated women are better able to support themselves and have more bargaining power, including on family size.

According to the ideation theory, more educated women may learn different ideas of desired family size through school, community, and exposure to global communication networks. Finally, more educated women know more about prenatal care and child health, and hence might have lower fertility because of greater confidence that their children will survive.
 
The only reason I was able to buy a house was because I went on repeated, back to back tours over a very short period of time. If you think a little bit of elbow grease and cutting back some luxuries (such as occasional eating out as a family) will grant enough money to buy a house in the 2020s, I have a bridge to sell you.
 
The only reason I was able to buy a house was because I went on repeated, back to back tours over a very short period of time. If you think a little bit of elbow grease and cutting back some luxuries (such as occasional eating out as a family) will grant enough money to buy a house in the 2020s, I have a bridge to sell you.
There is definitely merit in what you say but there are many variables to this. Location is a big part of it, as well as type of employment for both yourself and your spouse, along with the standard of living that you live.

My wife and I both drive Honda's (yes, I'm originally from Windsor and yes I don't drive cars from the 'Big Three', but my cars are manufactured here in Canada), me a 2008 Honda Civic and her a 2016 CRV. Our cars are 15 and 7yrs old respectively. I have zero expectations of selling my Civic in the next 2, maybe 3 or 4yrs and that CRV will mostly likely be around for another 5+yrs. Could I afford to go out right now and buy a 3 series BMW, yes, luckily I could do so, same with my wife. But I had an accountant for a father, who worked 42yrs with Chrysler Canada in the financial department and he drilled into my head and my brothers head - "a car is a depreciating asset, treat it as such' - meaning buy a good car and run it into the ground before you buy another. My brother drives a 2000(!) Dodge Dakota pick-up truck still, it has over 550,000km on it. He doesn't intend to sell it until it breaks 600,000km and I wouldn't be surprised if he changes his mind at 600,000 and looks for 650,000km. He is luckily in the same position as myself, he could have bought a new truck years ago, decades ago, but the current truck still does want he needs it to do - get him reliably from Point A to Point B in some comfort and safety.

Prices of houses have gone up but people's expectations as to what is 'normal' have gone up even higher in my opinion. Hell, I peel off stamps on envelopes that haven't been cancelled by Canada Post just so I can re-use them and not buy new ones, that's how frugal I can be. When out of walks I pick up and take home beer bottles or liquor bottles so I can return them for the deposit.
 
take a lesson from the Kazakhstani's. The youngest son stays in the family home to look after the parents and raises his family there. The family works together to raise the necessary money for the older siblings to purchase their own home and move out. They start when the children are young. They work together as a family unit.

1st son inherits
2nd son to the ministry
3rd son to the army
4th and subsequent on remittances to Alberta to raise cattel.

It worked. :D
 
Given that major defence procurements often take decades to implement in Canada, this open letter should have been titled a “Mea Culpa.”

The signatories were all in senior positions of power when the Canadian military went woefully off course.

Only now that they are safely aboard their retirement lifeboats are they raising the alarm that Canada’s military is about to sink.

 
The only reason I was able to buy a house was because I went on repeated, back to back tours over a very short period of time. If you think a little bit of elbow grease and cutting back some luxuries (such as occasional eating out as a family) will grant enough money to buy a house in the 2020s, I have a bridge to sell you.
Maybe not in some of the overinflated markets. But certainly in other markets.
 

posted here as Im not sure where all the comorant stuff belongs. Looks like the on again off again is back on again. 16 helicopters upgraded
 
That’s a lot of carbons for one helicopter just to respond to a call. Our convict environment minister gets off on letting people die as long as we meet our net zero goals.
 
Back
Top