• Thanks for stopping by. Logging in to a registered account will remove all generic ads. Please reach out with any questions or concerns.

Government hints at boosting Canada’s military spending

You know, I don't want anything super flashy or massively expensive - just ambulances. Ones that are reliable, functional, and rapidly available in decent numbers. Is that too much to ask?
Best I do is this:
5247750569_ce8eb0015f_b.jpg
 
From Noah, my favourite defense analyst, it appears that Canada and the South Koreans have been carrying out a serious of meetings/discussions. Interesting to see whar comes out of it.

Any info on if the German - Norwegians have been doing anything similar over the last 3 months?
 
There are not enough Amb variants being procured. If we took every ASCV Amb the CAF is getting, and every functional LSVW Amb left in the CAF, we could not support a single full CMBG in operations.
This is my not shocked face.

When I joined in the 80’s it was painfully clear that the CA wasn’t serious about combat medicine or casualty handling. I have not seen anything that would suggest it had changed.


Of course, the CA hasn’t been very serious about a lot of things for decades
 
Given that a potential adversary that is not a signatory to certain conventions, I would offer that the evac chain ought to be armoured.
I think the issue is there’s a difference between medical evacuation and medical transport. I don’t think the CA has enough for either of those, even if it pretended the other role didn’t exist
 
I think the issue is there’s a difference between medical evacuation and medical transport. I don’t think the CA has enough for either of those, even if it pretended the other role didn’t exist
You're quite right. As I recall "CASEVAC" is what units do to remove their wounded from the field of battle, eg, loaded up in a LAV, carried back to the CCP, etc. And "MEDEVAC" is when health services does it, eg, an ambulance with a Med Tech on board. As for Med TN, I imagine someone taking a civvy taxi to the hospital or something.
 
I thought medical transport is the movement of patients between medical facilities. Intra hospital transfers, usually done by Ambulance civi side. The patient is usually stable and has already undergone treatment.

Perhaps MEDEVAC is still prior to surgical intervention?
 
FWIW there are 2 versions of Medical AMPV's here

I attached BAE's glossy Brochure pages.

Medical Evac
DIGITAL_BAE_Print_USL_Landscape_AMPV_Medical Evacuation_Page_2.jpg
Medical Treatment
DIGITAL_BAE_USL_Landscape_AMPV CDR_Int'l_Medical Treatment_Page_2.jpg
 
Armoured Ambs, tracked or wheeled, are definitely needed for Role 1 HSS in a major conflict - essentially moving casualties from the CCP back to the UMS. From the UMS back to the Role 2 (BMS), I would suggest wheeled armoured ambs are the best option. BMS to Role 3 can be wheeled, minimal armour.

That is the ideal....

The problem, is that observations from Ukraine show that Ambs have a short life span (can be as low as three days). They are being deliberately targeted. That means that the Role 2 and Role 3 need to be farther back, with longer evac times, increasing time lags from injury to definitive surgical intervention. A lot of the movement of casualties is now done at night only. In terms of Ambs, anything forward of the BMS needs to be small enough to avoid drawing attention, heavily enough armoured to survive drone attacks, quick and agile, and cheap enough to get in quantity - and I cannot think of anything available that offers that balance.
 
Back
Top