Recent content by ballz

Has anyone ever actually submitted a grievance over that and got denied? And at least pushed it the committee as opposed to just the IA? Nothing toxic about that practice at all....

Unsurprisingly, after two emails and a week having gone by, they just tried to brush it off with a bogus answer and no reference to any legislation or regulation to support their position. "Good day, the Payment was made for the time in 2022 that you were in the CAF, if you receive money owed...

Interpretation of compensation and benefits policy (which includes TD) is an HR function, which is why it falls under DCBA and not somewhere in Adm(Fin). Account verification, s. 34 certification, and s. 33 is a finance function (accounting actually... it would help the CAF if it could use...

I'm curious to know if it was being denied by an FSA doing s. 34 or by someone at the RDAO shop doing s. 33. There's no reason a unit FSA exercising S.34 on claims can't be given additional guidance from the CO, to, for example, get a written statement from the member as to why they had to pick...

Thanks With any luck someone else that this happened to noticed in July and the 6-12 months it will take them to figure out how to amend a T4A is at least already 6 months complete. Agreed, there's a lot of factors that go into it. For me, I am not going to try and be and active investor...

So I just noticed on my T4 that when they paid out the back-pay to me in 2023, longer after I have released and after having taken the transfer value, that they withheld amounts for RPP contributions? Has anyone encountered this?

That is unfortunately a slight against the CAF in that it has strayed from so far from optimal in its back-end support from anything recognizable to the business world and a slight against the Fin O's own competence in that they couldn't recognize it.

No change is 100% positive. In a perfect world, you could make something like that as a rite of passage and using it as a selection tool, it might be 90% positive to 10% negative, which is a huge win. But in today's climate? Not sure it would be in any way viable. Probably much more viable to...

I will understand that my sarcasm would be hard to understand since you haven't been on the sexual misconduct threads, so for your benefit - and so it doesn't fly over the head of those who the comment is actually aimed at - I'll clarify. My comment is a remark of the hypocrisy aimed towards...

Only GOFOs accused of sexual misconduct are off limits for disparaging remarks, presumption/assumption/suggestion of guilt, etc. Every one else is fair game. Sorry, I don't make the rules, hate the game and all that.

Funny.... Cause my thought to this was "or they are the kind of person that that spouts off the tried and true 'don't leave, if you just get promoted high enough, eventually you can change all this.'"

Oh good then, happy to be corrected as that would be embarrassing. Not true for all things though. GoodLife fitness, provincial parks in Alberta, for sure require a CFOne number. It's weird.

It does have some good perks, although it's very irritating that more organizations recognize the CFOne card than the actual vets ID. Edit: And I hadn't even read the part about how you will need to use your CFOne card for this, not your Vets ID. Some places will only accept CFOne and some...

As I mentioned, mess membership being mandatory and being imposed a levy are two different things. Definitely not true. Whether something is a taxable benefit or not comes down to whether the primary reason for it is for the employer's benefit or not. That's why ILP funding was not a taxable...