I've been giving some thought to this and about the difficulties of turning the Reserves into a deployable force.
Using infantry units as an example you'd have a Reserve Division which would be an administrative command that would organize the existing Reserve Brigades and focus on individual...
Which is why I suggest going for UCAV/CCA here in Canada as Saab and Airbus are already discussing collaboration. Fighter production would only be looked at IF Sweden and Germany were to team up for a FCAS replacement.
Frankly, F-35's with UCAV would probably be a better option for the RCAF...
Well, if Australia really wants to deter China (and hedge against possible lack of support from the US) then maybe they should get French SSBN's instead of SSNs....
Makes for quite a read...
https://www.cp24.com/local/toronto/2026/02/05/toronto-police-officers-arrested-in-plot-to-murder-ontario-corrections-officer/
So, 65-88 x F-35's and Saab builds a plant to build UCAVs - or if FCAS falls apart as seems likely - a NextGen fighter collaboration between Sweden, Germany and Canada. Saab and Airbus are already talking collaboration on UCAV's and CCA's and there are feelers out between Sweden and Germany...
From the US 2026 National Defense Strategy:
I wonder what "critical but more limited support" means in the long term. Does it mean less/no maneuver forces at the front and just air and high-level support forces? How does that affect our decisions on equipment commonality?
I've been in favour of an all F-35 fleet but was previously of the opinion that a mixed fleet increased in size to consist of at least 65 x F-35's and 65 x "Missile Truck" fighters (preferably F-15EX's but likely Gripens for political reasons) would not have a serious negative impact on the...
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.