If the army figures they have a grip on the C-UAS battle why are they conducting a re-org?
https://www.defenseone.com/defense-systems/2025/08/pentagon-stands-new-group-coordinate-anti-drone-efforts/407778/
https://www.nationaldefensemagazine.org/articles/2025/8/25/armys-project-flytrap-looks-to-zap-some-drones
The US Army figures they have the static C-UAS battle sussed. Now they are trying to figure out how to apply the technology to blocking during the offense.
Doesn't sound like any office I ever worked in. Projects were communal affairs even when one person was the designated lead.
Of course I am a relic of smoking in the office and a beer with my Swiss Chalet at lunch. As well as 54 hour shifts when commissioning plants.
And here's one for the Gripen crew...
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/us/news/2025/08/27/pilots-mid-air-phone-call-to-manufacturers-f-35-crash/
So, somehow, somebody allowed water into the hydraulics. Fair enough. Operator error and revise your maintenance procedures.
Two ships in 9 days...
https://cimsec.org/a-system-of-systems-analysis-is-needed-for-maritime-strike/
This article references explicitly the needs of Maritime Strike given the preponderance of Over-The-Horizon / Beyond-Visual-Range munitions on the developing battlespace. I included it under artillery and the...
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.