I mean that’s awesome. It I bet if you look in any of those JTACs log books F18 is behind about four other air craft. I’ve got more F16, A10, and B52s that F18 controls. Hell if you go off this year I’ve got more Raphael and Eurofighter controls. I did manage to get one a few months ago...
The Vandoos were raised for WW1, any trace back to French colonial troops is dubious at best. There’s legitimate very old French Canadian and English Canadian regiments though.
Well that’s an intense reaction to my suggestion that it was more practical when we had a unified set of rank insignia for officers based in the naval rank insignia. Please note I only ever said insignia, and absolutely not point did I suggest the rank themselves should change - or that...
Purple trades are self correcting ? I’ll be sure to pass that on to the sailor from 2 VPs UMS that just taught me combat first aid and the other sailors we have in RHQ. I agree it’s a sub optimal situation but I still think a unified system of rank identifiers makes sense. Convenience is a word...
It’s not a failed experiment, it’s our daily work environment. An infantry Bn can have Navy Log Os, Air Force clerks and vice versa. There is logic to ensuring they all have similar rank insignia. I don’t think that’s an attack on identity so much as it’s the logical response to the reality.
the questions isn’t the cost it’s the use case. What does that 80 lb Mach .7 missile do for us, and what do we give up to have people man and operate that systems.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.