Recent content by MJP

This is a larger issue than "printed forms" as it involves almost anything that needs to be printed. This includes what people in this thread are thinking of when it comes to printed forms but more importantly things like field message pads, stickers, warning labels and many more. Essentially...

Yes that is what I meant for sizzle.

I mean we did exactly that so yes...but please no. Please no

Agreed. My other hope is we get out of huge one off buys and just continually upgrade the fleets over time.

As long as you're showing back up to RMC with all the right leave burnt, it shouldn't be an issue to them and really they have no authority if you're properly attached posted. However, if you're getting short leave and not burning all your annual leave that you need to burn during the summer...

Agreed. Worth clarifying though DRMIS is not CGCS. CGCS displays material master data but it's not pulling it live from DRMIS/SAP. They mirror each other in what you see, but they're distinct systems. As for pictures, DRMIS/SAP can technically hold images attached to a material master record...

The messaging was lost in this one. The NCR return is specifically aimed at getting folks who are not entitled to kit to return it.

We finally found a use for it. OFC the most useful version for this type of thing is the one we bought the least of.

While time will tell, this was intended very much to be a short term solution while a better semi-permanent camp is built.

This thread is definitely taking a sidetrack from Latvia, but there is a trial going on with something very similar to what you're mentioning where the the claimant just uploads all the stuff. Not sure how it's going but folks are thinking the right way anyway

I still remember the QMSI signed me up for a NPF deduction for my sash so I can be awarded one upon my promotion. Was very clear that I was happy to pay for my own sash. I didn't understand why my pay was deducted without my permission but everybody whitewashed it.

Mandatory high level requirement: able to fire on the move - specifically in complex terrain while inverted (no not a typo).

I suspect our inability to think at divisional and theater sustainment levels are going to make these orgs clones of their Bde counter parts. Hope to be wrong.

One problem that has arisen lately is an L1 or an element of one will do something like this but forget they need to utilize stock or resources that is managed/controlled by another L1. BMQ is a great example as it uses a large amount of army field kit to achieve its aims. If there is no...

We very poorly employed them in Afghanistan. My personal opinion is they are just a tool in the toolbox and I rather we focus on AT at the Sect and Pl level rather than trying to make sniper lite folks