The courts can say whether it’s within the guardrails to even ask the question to do something down the road. And each of those somethings could also be considered by the Black Mumu Behind the Bench Club.
Call me cynical but anything can be brought to the courts.
And how did that time with PP's declaration that Team Blue's voting against separation, one wonders? I ask because I haven't been tracking chronology closely.
Besides, the political Rorschach still applies: Boosters'll say (rightly) that it don't matter when the right thing to say is said...
Well, there's a case to be made that these guys appeared to try that in an entertainment vehicle with people holding controversial views publicly, and a lot of folks don't seem tooooooo keen on that.
Should the CBC Machine have known whazzup? Their denials sound a bit hollow re: how such...
Good call on Ontario's part: "Ontario Restricting Government Use of Chinese-Made Drones - Province protecting sensitive provincial data while supporting Canadian-made drone technology ...." (text also attached)...
On that whole CBC-backed hyper-satire gone wild thing, this via the RCMP's National Police Federation ....
https://npf-fpn.com/news-item/rcmp-members-intentionally-misled-in-cbc-entertainment-aptn-production-npf-demands-cancellation-and-taxpayer-accountability/...
On a lighter note, RUS courts say if it ain't a war, no insurance claim for YOU!
https://ua.news/en/war-vs-rf/sud-rf-vidmoviv-u-viplati-kompensatsiyi-za-udar-po-naftobazi-bilia-anapi
The info-machine on winding down Nanisivik - or, in info-speak, "transitioning it out of operational use" (also archived here).
https://www.canada.ca/en/department-national-defence/news/2026/05/department-of-national-defence-to-transition-nanisivik-naval-facility-out-of-operational-use.html
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.