Usually, anarchist/antifa/anti-capitalists tend to hit big chains - <sarcasm> very nice touch </sarcasm> hitting what looks like a local biz using an evil payment app.
Where's the time gone?
https://globalnews.ca/news/11826160/quebec-mosque-shooter-prison/
https://www.ledevoir.com/actualites/justice/976511/alexandre-bissonnette-denonce-traitement-cruel-inusite-port-cartier
A bit more "told ya so" from The Line reporter who gave EA a head's up 31 March.
https://www.readtheline.ca/p/scoop-jen-gerson-elections-albertas
Archived link.
You’re right - and there are points to pick on legitimately for sure. But if the PhD or resume is mentioned, it draws the eye/ear. If the PhD or resume didn’t matter, why mention it at all, then? Bit of a tactical ball drop, but nothing more so far.
... but maybe not ALL you IRN officials :)
https://www.ctvnews.ca/politics/article/immigration-minister-says-shes-accountable-after-former-irgc-official-granted-a-visa/
This doesn't sound good ....
https://www.defensenews.com/global/europe/2026/04/30/ukraines-army-chief-shakes-up-troop-rotations-after-outcry/
From the article:
If we’re talking plain adjective use of the terms in bar-chat-level discussion, 100%.
But if someone’s calling for or implying judicial punishment from said “bribery” or “treason,” (especially when folks on the socials talk about “we know what happens to traitors”) the bar needs to maybe be...
Just like “treason,” there’s the book definition the courts would have to consider and/or prove, and then there’s the partisan definition for memes & gotcha’s.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.