Recent content by The Bread Guy

Of course he does .... https://toronto.citynews.ca/2026/01/22/lutnick-calls-carneys-speech-political-noise-and-cautions-canada-on-china-deal/

Still in business in the U.S. as well, too, though, waiting for a deal for some of the assets to be sold to American investors. https://techcrunch.com/2026/01/22/heres-whats-you-should-know-about-the-us-tiktok-deal/

Kurds are still being pressed hard by SYR, for sure ... https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c9311l0d40qo https://www.aljazeera.com/features/2026/1/21/syrian-forces-makes-gains-against-sdf-what-it-means-for-countrys-kurds...

Michelle Rempel Garner on "the speech" (also archived here) .... https://nationalpost.com/opinion/michelle-rempel-garner-nice-speech-carney-but-what-are-you-going-to-do-about-it ... with this bit standing out for me as at least suggesting that PP will likely continue more down the opposing path...

One in four think the fed plan will keep them safer than the TPS approach, but that =/= respondents hating responsible gun owners (unless Leger asked that question). What jumps out at me is almost 1/3 aren’t sure which approach is best. If it truly applies across the board, THAT’S a crack...

No, but The Beaverton's running this ... https://www.thebeaverton.com/2026/01/trump-demands-carney-give-him-his-standing-ovation-from-davos/ :) Meanwhile, from Catholic media: https://www.pillarcatholic.com/p/broglio-us-troops-could-refuse-greenland Archived here.

You mean give him the same leeway & benefit of the doubt you give Carney & Co.?

For the record, here’s POTUS47’s latest via FB:

Latest on this one: Federal Court says TikTok Canada can stay open. https://ca.news.yahoo.com/cp-newsalert-federal-court-sets-195442780.html

Better or worse than armed, masked folks just standing in state legislatures during Covid? ;)

Following up on a previous question: you see opposition protests against heavy-handed ICE folks having reached “armed revolt”?

Give it a day or to before his socials light up.

I would take his quote from the Q&A in the Peace Fund as being a roundabout way of saying he won’t just pay into a Trump slush fund. I’d love him to say “screw that” to POTUS47 & Co. too in this I one, but some here have also been saying one should be very selective about poking this bear, so...

Canada should fight =/= I should/would go fight, it appears. To be fair though, that wasn’t the question asked in that survey.

Also part of the calculus would be where those guns are (are they owned in areas likely to be attacked or occupied), as well as what proportion would be willing the owners would be to defend current Canadian management. If we’re seeing a range of opinions here on the forums re: whether or how...