Or by individuals/groups with enough resources and stamina to litigate it to the hilt.
Likely.
Likely at a practical level, but as political narrative, what it reveals about the speaker counts optically as well.
True enough, for sure. The "traitor" vs. "patriot" political narrative pigeonholing comes into play, though, based on how much people agree or disagree (and how much) with aims of the party in question.
Using the American Revolution as an example, while Tarleton & Co. made a bit of a name for...
Ooopsie ....
https://www.cp24.com/news/canada/2026/02/13/freeland-violated-law-by-answering-questions-about-byelection-elections-canada/
No fine, just a "promise not to do this again" -- from the Commissioner's info-machine...
Country loans private company money =/= separatists asking country x for a line of credit and help building a military to break away from country y. Wordsmith it however you like, they're not the same.
Is the difference between the "American Revolution thing" and "breaking up a country, behind...
Barring evidence of Canada seeking help from the CCP on building a new CF, or asking China for a line of credit to keep the lights on, no.
Given you’re comfortable downplaying self-identifying separatists (going to the point of telling the US “no thanks” to 51st status) to break away from...
More on that from the NBC story sourced by the Daily Beast:
https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/trump-administration/canadian-separatists-alberta-meetings-trump-officials-rcna258230
Archived version here.
So you'd be OK with any "no legal standing/can't negotiate anything/rabble rouser" folks...
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.