• Thanks for stopping by. Logging in to a registered account will remove all generic ads. Please reach out with any questions or concerns.

2025 U.S. - Venezuela conflict

A shame they fired a good number of people earlier this year that had the job of looking into stuff like this specifically.

Meh.

It's not like the USA is a part of the ICC. Just hope some personnel never go on vacation.
 
Apparently USMC activity taking place on Trinidad & Tobago which lies just off the coast of Venezuela...

Grenada 1983? or 84? hmmmm

Any American students in Venezuela?


dirty harry GIF
 
It'd be a whole lot easier to just send in some sniper teams and just kill Maduro.
 
Hand over the oil and no one gets hurt...

Pressure On Maduro Cranked Up As USS Gerald R. Ford Arrives In Caribbean​

The State Department is declaring Maduro's alleged cartel a Foreign Terrorist Organization potentially opening the aperture for expanded strikes.

 
Sounds like the US will soon expand its anti-drug strikes to targets on land

Trump says US land action against alleged drug trafficking networks in Venezuela will start ‘very soon’

President Donald Trump suggested Thursday that the United States is preparing to take new action against alleged drug trafficking networks in Venezuela, telling service members during a Thanksgiving call that efforts for strikes on land will be starting “very soon.”

“In recent weeks, you’ve been working to deter Venezuelan drug traffickers, of which there are many. Of course, there aren’t too many coming in by sea anymore,” Trump told service members in the call.

“You probably noticed that people aren’t wanting to be delivering by sea, and we’ll be starting to stop them by land also,” the president continued. “The land is easier, but that’s going to start very soon.
 
Why do we care, they're drug runners. Play by the sword, die by the sword.
some arent, atleast one case has been verified as gasoline smugglers which is a very common thing down there because its no cheap in Venezuela compared to the surrounding nations
 
Why do we care, they're drug runners. Play by the sword, die by the sword.
The U.S. administration has already claimed this to be an “armed conflict” to justify the use of military strikes. Are they making up what rule set they want to play by? Yes, obviously. But they’re still trying to claim legitimacy under one of the available rule sets. Ordering or carrying out lethal strikes on survivors of a sinking is a crime under any of them that I’ve ever studied. I’d respectfully even go so far as to say that it’s one of those orders that’s not just unlawful, but is manifestly so, meaning it should be recognized as such and disobeyed by military officers.
 
Back
Top