- Reaction score
- 11,962
- Points
- 1,160
He's right. Depending on their doctrine, of course..
Same story since Tunisia 1942 - Waho Mohammed!

He's right. Depending on their doctrine, of course..
I noticed that trend sometime ago and stated that such systems needed a SHORAD network to travel under and enough SHORAD systems to be able to leapfrog each other and setup ahead of the movement of the main system.Ukrainian drones take out a Russian S-400 launcher while on the move.
![]()
Ukrainian drones destroy Russian S-400 launchers
Ukrainian strike drones destroyed two self-propelled launchers of Russia’s S-400 air defense system in the Belgorod region, according to Ukrainian military officials and open-source analysis released this week. As reported by Militarnyi, citing the General Staff of the Armed Forcesdefence-blog.com
Are we at the point that LRAD/MRAD systems need dedicated SHORAD systems to protect them?
With the ubiquity of small UAVs we're quite likely at the point that every unit needs a SHORAD (or at least VSHORAD) capability embedded within their TOE.I noticed that trend sometime ago and stated that such systems needed a SHORAD network to travel under and enough SHORAD systems to be able to leapfrog each other and setup ahead of the movement of the main system.
Is The Trump Administration Quietly Unwinding Sanctions On Russia?
This update is already getting long, so one final short piece that will lead to something longer soon. As I’ve always believed that Trump is determined to help Putin and his anti-Russian stances are for show, to “con” people into not admitting the truth. As part of that, I always thought the that the US government under his watch would actually find ways to help the Russian war effort, This week the administration actually broke cover. In a story that did not receive nearly the amount of coverage it deserved, the Trump administration removed a range of sanctions on companies doing important trade with Russia. Here was how a story on the move started.
The United States has removed sanctions from several foreign companies previously accused of supplying equipment to Russia, including items linked to its defense and military-industrial sectors.
The changes were published on the US Treasury Department’s website on December 18, without any explanation for the move.
This kind of move jibes well with what we are seeing with US trade. Though Trump has initiated a trade war with much of the world, under his rule, US exports to some central Asian states and Turkey are up markedly—suspiciously so. Here are the figures for Uzbekistan.
Between Feb and Sept 2024, the US exported knowingly $223.6 millions of dollars of goods to Uzbekistan. The equivalent figure under Trump for 2025 was $319.9 million. This is almost a 50% percent leap in a very short period of time.
Something close to identical percentage wise has happened with US exports to Kyrgyzstan.
Likewise, US trade with Turkey (where some of the companies which saw their sanctions relaxed this week are based) also was up noticeably since Trump became President. In the case of Turkey, US exports under Trump were up by almost 25% between Feb-Sept 2025 when compared to the same period in 2024.
And all of this during a trade war?
Now, because of the US government shutdown, the figures have not been released since September. But already we have indications that under Trump, US trade that can help Russia has been up significantly. Instead of obsessing on the deliberately weak sanctions placed on Russian oil, we should consider the fact that Trump is actually helping undermine US sanctions on Russia. The step this week therefore might only confirm the reality that the US is helping Russia far more than people want to admit.
www.dagens.com
euromaidanpress.com
- Confirmation of Ukraine’s sovereignty
- Non-aggression agreement between Russia and Ukraine; monitoring on the contact line
- Security guarantees
- A peacetime cap on the Ukrainian military to 800,000 personnel
- The US, NATO and Europe will provide Ukraine with security guarantees based on NATO’s Article 5 mutual defense clause; a new Russian invasion is to be met with a military response and renewed sanctions.
- Russia will enshrine a non-aggression policy towards Europe and Ukraine in all necessary laws
- Ukraine will become an EU member at some point, with plans to fix the accession date
- A global development package to be determined in a separate investment agreement
- The creation of several funds to address recovery issues (goal: $800 billion)
- Acceleration of the free trade agreement between Ukraine and the US
- Ukraine’s nuclear-free status
- (Terms contested) Zaporizhzhia Nuclear Power Plant: The US offers a trilateral arrangement, with the US as the chief manager; Kyiv offers to split it 50/50 between the US and Ukraine
- Educational programs in schools to promote understanding and tolerance of different cultures and to eliminate racism and prejudice
- (Terms contested) Territories. One option sees Russia withdrawing from Dnipropetrovsk, Mykolaiv, Sumy, and Kharkiv, while Ukraine holds its positions in Donetsk, Luhansk, Zaporizhia, and Kherson. Russia demands Ukraine leave Donetsk, while the US proposes a compromise: a free economic zone. If the “hold positions” agreement fails, the free economic zone would require a referendum, and the entire document would then be subject to a vote
- Russia and Ukraine undertake not to change the agreements by force
- Russia will not prevent Ukraine from using the Dnieper River and the Black Sea for commercial purposes. The Kinburn Spit will be demilitarized
- All-for-all prisoner exchange, return of civilians, children, and political prisoners
- Ukraine must hold elections soon after the agreement is signed
- This agreement will be legally binding. Its implementation will be monitored by a Peace Council headed by US President Donald Trump
- Once all parties agree to this agreement, a full ceasefire will come into effect immediately
Unfortunately this is likely far too reasonable for two particular individuals.
![]()
Zelensky Unveils Revised 20-Point Peace Plan
The revised draft retains some iterations of the original 28 points – such as a cap on Ukraine’s peacetime forces – while dropping provisions including the waiver of all legal recourse for war crimes.www.kyivpost.com
Anyone else notice the specific inclusion of Ukraine's 'nuclear free status' in this one?