• Thanks for stopping by. Logging in to a registered account will remove all generic ads. Please reach out with any questions or concerns.

Citing 'institutional resistance,' military police watchdog calls for broader powers

daftandbarmy

Army.ca Fossil
Reaction score
46,815
Points
1,160
Hmmm. resistance is therefore not futile, it seems ;)

Citing 'institutional resistance,' military police watchdog calls for broader powers​


OTTAWA — Canada’s military police watchdog is calling on the federal government to change the law to give her office more teeth and greater ability to investigate complaints.

Military Police Complaints Commission chair Tammy Tremblay made the call for the third year in a row in her annual report, released today.

She says her ability to do her work has been “significantly hampered” in recent years by inadequate investigative powers and “increasingly entrenched institutional resistance.”

Tremblay’s report comes amid a rise in the number of military police conduct complaints, and after she launched the first public interest hearings in more than a decade to probe serious allegations of misconduct.

She wrote to Defence Minister David McGuinty last year to propose a series of legal reforms that would, among other things, give her broader subpoena powers to obtain information on cases.

The legislation governing her office hasn’t changed since it was first created in 1999.

 
Not sure what you mean. Our local RCAF has MPs and I suspect every other CAF facility does as well.
The trade is apparently going to entirely be army element if I’ve understood correctly?
 
Does that mean that in the Navy, we can go back to Shore Patrol Duties, Coxns dealing with disciplinary matters and RCMP/Civilian Police dealing with criminal conduct? :)
 
Back
Top