Search results

Strange rendering of the CSC along with info about DeLOG. Type 45 for all. https://www.navalreview.ca/2022/04/bae-and-lockheed-martin-may-have-submitted-the-wrong-bid-for-the-csc-program/

🏆

And the canon efficacy that cannons work in dogfight that actually occurr.

I hoped that we wouldn’t have to go back for the reasoning behind the single-surface-combatant: The only way to have the load out you want is for the changes only to occur in the VLS. 4-5 billion a year is a good deal for our SPY-7 NORAD/nato obligations.

SAR, environmental protection, fisheries. Many ways to protect people, their livelihoods and their communities without having a 25mm canon.

Thanks @Underway

I know that SPY6 is based on two foot cube phased arrays. How does the SPY7 work In relation to the SPY6?

All of the vls launchers will be strike length. So they could fit a SM3 if wanted.

There are very few RQ-9B drones in the world. So no. The probject required it be armed, so no Triton. https://www.canada.ca/en/department-national-defence/services/procurement/remotely-piloted-aircraft-system.html...

I really enjoyed attending that. Seeing two Halifax and Kingstons in person was quite the treat.

Sorry

http://dgpaapp.forces.gc.ca/en/defence-capabilities-blueprint/project-details.asp?id=975

Lolololol. To true.

I don’t know anything about the fisheries being top heavy. I do know that the the hydrographic ship was a sent back from Seaspan to the original designer for being top heavy.

Sounds like Canadian naval architects need to shake there heads. Also the winches supplied for the ships either poorly speced or poorly built.

I hope we’re not going down that road.

Isn’t there a difference between being declared the preferred bidder and the contract being signed. This was how it was done with the CSC.

But it would cost even more trying to upgrade 2b to 4 baseline F-35s Or even replace them.

May Raven ECM? https://www.lockheedmartin.com/en-ca/ew.html

I was referring to the square thing, not the decoy thing.