I presume that a "combative" classification allows for an increase in options, a taser being one of them.
I agree with your second point. It is baffling why they didn't perform such. I guess that comes out in the inquiry.
+1
Removing the taser removes an intervention tool, which would limit response options. There was no reasonable expectation that Mr Dziekanski would die from being tasered.
IMHO the use of the taser was appropriate in this instance. If there is concern on aspects of it's employment, then by all...
Apparently it's one of the "in" things to do on the internet.
The kids got me pretty regular until I started recognizing the internet address thing.
Rotten brats. School couldn't come soon enough! ;)
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.