Search results

RCAF keeps people right?

It will entirely depend on what assets will be based there, and what the security requirements for those assets are. Shift for WASF are currently 12 hrs on, 12 hrs off, 4 days on and 4 days off.

I am not advocating to structure ourselves for as many units as possible. I am advocating that we reduce the number of partially filled units and consolidate our forces in fully functionning units.

That would require more people and more positions than we can dream of. Within the current constraints we have, having multiple small units and formations doesn’t work. It just consumes resources that are needed elsewhere.

Typically, it’s because it doesn’t fit with our training cycle. We’ve supported CAS for SOFCOM, Canadian Army and Allied Forces about 3 times in the last year, for two weeks at the time. Not quite. The CA doesn’t Force Employ. Units and people may employ but under CJOC. The CA only has a...

Great. Last experience was yesterday. When was yours? Great. Please read our doctrine. The RCAF, CA and RCN are only force generator. From the 4th Canadian Division website: "The mission of 4 Cdn Div is to generate and maintain, at designated states of readiness, combat ready, multi-purpose...

Enough to do NORAD and NATO missions (we already do that albeit with a cost to Force Generation when we go overseas). We’re short in part because we’re transitioning. We have a decent amount of available jets on a daily basis (more than we can reasonably fly). The only Force Employers are...

I’d say that pretty good right now. Nowhere near 5th Gen but our offensive capabilities are pretty good. Brigades as in plural? I’d like a source for that. The Canadian Army has four Divisions plus CADTC. Each division has a Regular Force Brigade and a bunch of Reserve Brigades. None of the...

It is a task that is part of capabilities. We can keep our place secure within NATO with RCAF, RCN and a smaller CA. Which combat capabilities are critical and why? Where are those stated? Also, reducing in size doesn’t mean losing capabilities, it means we can’t employ them for as long...

We send detachments somewhat regularly, as part of the NATO rotations for eAP, and participate in NATO-Nations exercises under Op REASSURANCE yearly. We’re limited in what we can do at the moment because of the staffing levels for fighter pilots. We don’t want to compromise our transition to...

If you look at all priorities, and which element is supporting: 1 & 2: Protection of Canada/North America (RCAF/RCN) 3 & 4: Expeditionary ops (RCAF, RCN, CA, SOF) 5: Capacity Building (RCAF, RCN, CA, SOF but probably better served by SOF/CA) 6: Support to law enforcement agencies (SOF, RCN...

88

If you look at the DPU, protecting Canada and North America are number 1 and 2 priorities. How is the Army contributing to those priorities on a day-to-day basis?

Nobody has depth.

If we can’t enrol or retain more, can’t we repurpose some of the CAF resources to security? Looking at what is currently being procured, seems like the Navy and the Air Force are both priorities for the CAF. Why not reorient some of the Army to Security? Why not keep 1 Infantry Regiment, 1...

My Squadron CWO agrees with advanced promotions, so do all the Sgt/WO/MWOs. I hold regular 1 on 1 with WOs/MWOs and officers, and hold meeting with every other rank levels in group settings and that was never raised as an issue. I will ask specifically in my next set of meetings with them. I...

What difference does it make to season as a Pte or as a Cpl? We advance promote every Avr to Cpl in the RCAF. No issues observed.

He has not quietly sided with Elon and Vivek. He said, back in June (before he was elected and picked Elon as the head of DOGE), that people studying in the US should get a green card automatically, not that more H1B visas for skilled foreigners should be issued. Nice try.