Meanwhile what the Marines are thinking (and US Army to follow after them? Still seems to me there needs to be a lot more coordination to avoid equipment and missions duplication):
Mark
Ottawa
Hmm–JADC2 so one COCOM or another, can act in some form or another (not necessarily kinetically, maybe NORTHCOM itself), vs Russkies “left of launch” against North America? Some coded language here it seems to me:
And last year from CDA Institute:
Mark
Ottawa
RCAF/USAF turning Thule into fighter base for NORAD Ex AMALGAMDART--with portable arresting gear--at the invaluable "War Zone" (Canadian media beaten yet again what CAF are doing)--with video:
Mark
Ottawa
First-rate descriptive paper by Dave Perry of CGAI at Naval Association of Canada on origins and development of National Shipbuilding Strategy, as seen by insiders:
Mark
Ottawa
More on US Army and Alaska/Arctic,
note Nordics (USMC giving up basing in Norway as part of Pacific pivot https://thebarentsobserver.com/en/2020/08/washington-pulls-700-us-marines-out-norway) and, gasp, Himalayas!
Mark
Ottawa
Meanwhile US Army joins Arctic policy party–Norway somewhat in mind, perhaps to take place of Marines who have been active there but now turning to Western Pacific (https://thebarentsobserver.com/en/2020/08/washington-pulls-700-us-marines-out-norway)?
Mark
Ottawa
1) Ottawa dithering on North Warning System:
2) But US commander of NORTHCOM and NORAD looks to much more active, indeed pre-emptive, role for NORTHCOM--would seem to leave NORAD as rather an afterthought if cruise missiles are launched, US clearly thinks simply improving radars of North...
Text of overall UK "Integrated Review)--defence part coming March 22:
https://www.gov.uk/government/collections/the-integrated-review-2021
And from Thin Pinstriped Line:
Mark
Ottawa
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.