Search results

True, both sides have a poor track record. But one side has been cumulatively in power far longer and made longer lasting cuts and changes, like the Decade of Darkness and selling off kit for no rhyme or reason like the Chinooks, desert uniforms, 60mm mortars, the M109s, and more recently...

The Hornets are also on their way out.

And Beechcraft even offers an armed version of the Harvard II, the AT-6 Wolverine.

It entered full rate production last year, is transonic, and Boeing plans to offer an armed version to replace old F-5 Freedom Fighters. And in case, we badly need to replace the Hawk and especially the Tutor.

AW101 Merlin.

I didn't think old engines would be reusable, but more that it would fit into our existing parts supply chain and our maintainers who are already trained to work on that engine.

Or the T-7 Red Tail, which uses the same engine as the Hornet.

Maybe if we replace the Hawk and Tutor with a trainer that can double as a light combat fighter in low intensity environments, it might make sense.

It's Ca valry. Calvary is the hill where Jesus died. Somehow, I doubt a hill will come to our rescue.

I've mostly seen people doing that in favour of the Liberals.

Except the Afghanistan mission had ended when spending dipped to 1%. Shortcomings by the Conservatives do not give a free pass to the Liberals.

"Could be"

Not sure how this relates to the federal government.

We actually have a few. The LHS HLVW are actually FMTV. Both trucks are based on the Steyr 1491.

Good for them?

Return of 1 Surface to Surface Missile Battery?

This is turning into Monstrous Regiment by Terry Pratchett.

I haven't seen anyone upset over it, just curious about the rationale.

Jordan and Lebanon had very negative experiences last time they took in Palestinians.