Search results

Is your insight based on anything substantive... you know, besides the last employer to hire her being Fox 'News'?  :pop:

So why bother having directives, that many people have spent time and effort determining, getting approved, and periodically revisiting I order to confirm continued relevance?  Directives that spell out, for example, Lvl 2 is perfectly appropriate for something, but someone decides to...

There are some disconnects between Capt and crews' testimonies.  Plus lots of "I don't remember," which is also a hallmark of this administration's several legal adventures.

So they're advocating for...… SOCIALISM?!  Damn you Bernie; what have you done?!    :panic:

Mass grave on Hart Island, NYC Copyright John Minchillo/AP       :not-again:

For anyone interested in the impending Emergency Act, Craig Forcese and Leah West have made available the relevant chapter from their soon to be released National Security Law (2nd ed.)    here

Just in, from Duffleblog     ;D

Hey, if Trump can go to bat for a convicted war criminal and return his Trident, why not someone who's a scape-goat for showing true leadership, and 'guilty' only of caring for his sailors' well-being.  [Notice how those attributes make him stand out so glaringly from the sycophant Beltway...

Ooohh…. designating white supremacists as terrorists in someone else's country.  What a bold move.    :boring: Sure, the Southern Poverty Law Center managed to document 940 active hate groups in the United States over the past 12 months;  I guess not one of them was 'hateful' enough.  ::)...

The description of the colonel is reminiscent of.... someone.... just can't put my finger on who... Hmmm... a big guy, mustachioed, ebullient....  ??? ;D

Jared Kushner.  Nothing else need be said.

Actually the sequence was: 1. LCol Morneau: "CAR not ready to go to Somalia" 2. LCol Morneau punted, replaced by LCol Mathieu 3. CAR magically ready       #OwnWorstEnemy    :not-again:

Having Retired AF Guy repost it is good;  people who have me on <ignore> because I've picked on them will get to see it. I mean, I doubt they'll wade through so many  words, but they'll see it.  :whistle:

I'll hide this article in here....  ;D More at LINK    :whistle:

Now, if I were a cynical type.... I'd see a Recon/MARSOC Marine finally in charge, going "ok, payback time you budget-eating, promotion-stealing, heavy metal bitches!"  ;D

End of days, indeed.    ;D  :cheers:

Well..... since enshrined in the Naval Service Act (1910) anyway. Of course, that Act contributed to the fall of Laurier's government;  probably never forgotten/forgiven by the Liberals, and why they're more predisposed to hate the military. #TrivialGeek  ;) Besides, there's nothing new to...

Darwinism seldom is.... even when it's self-selected.

If he does, I suspect that there will be bodies left behind.  ;D

Only because the Rush-Bagot treaty ruined naval warfare on the Great Lakes and Lake Champlain.  :orly: