• Thanks for stopping by. Logging in to a registered account will remove all generic ads. Please reach out with any questions or concerns.

Search results

  1. Haggis

    Self Defence in Canada (split from Gun Control 2.0)

    Same. I keep a copy of the Storage and Transportation regs in my range bag. I teach safety courses at my gun club and have experienced the same thing with LEOs from a bunch of different agencies. A few have gone on to be club RSOs and instructors. Back on topic, I received a fundraising...
  2. Haggis

    Self Defence in Canada (split from Gun Control 2.0)

    That is a very good question and a hard one to answer. Our byzantine firearms laws are tough for most LEOs to figure out on the side of the road. Most firearms enthusiasts are better versed in them than LEOs but they are not the ones laying the charges. To be "safe" some lazier LEOs will...
  3. Haggis

    Self Defence in Canada (split from Gun Control 2.0)

    You are confusing storage with transporting. Two different requirements (from the link you posted): Storage: Non-restricted firearms Attach a secure locking device, such as a trigger lock or cable lock (or remove the bolt) so the firearms cannot be fired; or Lock the firearms in a cabinet...
  4. Haggis

    Self Defence in Canada (split from Gun Control 2.0)

    The fact that we are arguing over storage regulations proves my point.
  5. Haggis

    Self Defence in Canada (split from Gun Control 2.0)

    Not so fast, Kev. There was a case about a guy who buried his guns in concrete in his yard and was found guilty of unsafe storage because the judge ruled the concrete block was "not lockable" and therefore not a proper storage container. I will try to find it.
  6. Haggis

    Self Defence in Canada (split from Gun Control 2.0)

    Still has to be trigger/cable locked or bolt removed and stored separately, without ammuntion readily available. I'm still convinced that our firearms laws were written by the same people who wrote home theatre assembly and operating instructions in the 1980's.
  7. Haggis

    Self Defence in Canada (split from Gun Control 2.0)

    I guess I'll start my Christmas list now.
  8. Haggis

    Self Defence in Canada (split from Gun Control 2.0)

    May I introduce you to Amber Guyger? And she was sober.
  9. Haggis

    Self Defence in Canada (split from Gun Control 2.0)

    My daughter, who lives right next door, had a mentally disturbed but non-violent young man wander into her house, clearly confused and in need of help. Should he have been the subject of deadly force? Dad (me) right next door, went over inmmediately to assess the situation and deemed it a...
  10. Haggis

    Self Defence in Canada (split from Gun Control 2.0)

    It's also highly unlikely that an armed homeowner, particularly in Canada, would be confronting an intruder with a holstered handgun. Most likely a long gun or impact weapon.
  11. Haggis

    Self Defence in Canada (split from Gun Control 2.0)

    If it walks like a duck and looks like a duck, it probably thinks it's a duck.
  12. Haggis

    Self Defence in Canada (split from Gun Control 2.0)

    Put the LASER pointer dot on the burglar's chest and let the cats do the rest.
  13. Haggis

    Self Defence in Canada (split from Gun Control 2.0)

    That's because the armed civilian generally has less intervention options available to them. No OC spray, baton or TASER. Assuming the victim has access to a firearm, escalation goes from verbal to lethal force with nothing in between. Self defence doesn't always involve a firearm. The recent...
  14. Haggis

    Self Defence in Canada (split from Gun Control 2.0)

    Thanks to the entertainment industry, when the good guy/gal wins, the next scene has everyone hoisting pints at the local watering hole. No investigation, no consequences. The majority of folks talk a good game without having taken any training or wargamed any self-defence scenarios in their...
  15. Haggis

    Self Defence in Canada (split from Gun Control 2.0)

    Self defence is rarely, if ever, a fair fight. In order to defend yourself you must, in most cases, overcome the threat to you. That is where the 34(2)(g) comes into play and why the requirement for proportionality became a factor, as Brihard pointed out earlier, and no longer a hard...
  16. Haggis

    Lawyer killed by mother in law's son's girlfriend's baby daddy. Florida, of course

    Probably the most convoluted thread title on this site.
  17. Haggis

    Self Defence in Canada (split from Gun Control 2.0)

    My wife and I went through a trial in 2016 where the question of proportionality was a key issue. (I can write of this as one party is now deceased and I have no idea where the other party is or if they are still alive.) In that case we had both witnessed a small statured lady with a large...
  18. Haggis

    Self Defence in Canada (split from Gun Control 2.0)

    There was another home invasion in my county last February in which the victims did use a firearm (possibly that of the intruders, but it's unconfirmed) resulting in the deaths of two of three intruders. No charges have been laid to date and the victims, who were initially taken into custody...
  19. Haggis

    Self Defence in Canada (split from Gun Control 2.0)

    According to recent news reports the intruder and resident were known to each other. The Kawartha Lakes Police Chief was quoted saying the charges were laid because the force use has to be proportional and reasonable. If you read the info at the link I posted yesterday, you would see that he is...
  20. Haggis

    5 Canadian soldiers suspended after Nazi salute video emerges

    To be fair, it was posted almost 5 years ago.
Back
Top