Search results

Odd that a guy from a party that lost like it did would try and flex on one of the most successful Conservative politicians ever.

Seems like the scouting is similar for Hellebyuk now.

They have cult standing now, as they played for Game 1 and people have linked it to the Kings beating down the Oilers. Maybe 2019 version of Gloria....

This is pretty much it.

What happens if the vehicle cannot access a place to support the section or platoon?

The biggest threat to a SPG is not longer CB, its loitering munitions that get them before they shoot, not before they scoot.

Not quite - we had asymmetrical sections until the arrival of the C7/C9 family in the 1980s. Before, it was asymmetric sections with an assault and support group. http://www.regimentalrogue.com/papers/sect_atk.htm

Neither will give you a "leg up" if you are interested in attempting SOF selection - they are both fine Regiments. Select based on where you want to live, understanding that you will at some point likely be posted away to other Army bases.

I don't think this would impact CAF members and their dependents posted OUTCAN, all of whom are posted on Green Passports with Visas, so they aren't visiting on 6-month tourist Visas.

There are ways where this is a plausible outcome, but other things need to happen first.

Meh, effect is less than Tsar Bomba, so no need to send Ben Affleck up to space.

No commentary required.

When you take the emotion out of it, there is a lot of of this that hits the mark.

Royal Canadian Artillery School. I should have actually used RRCA - Royal Regiment of Canadian Artillery.

At least your not shy of letting your RCAC anchoring bias show. Logisticians in second line sustainment organizations move all ammunition, and generally artillery ammunition is about 80% of a fighting organizations load. So an RCAC echelon is peanuts. Regardless, trying to determine whom is...

At least you're not shy of letting your RCAS anchoring bias show. Is there an advantage to teaching people one complete set of skills (indirect fires) and then teaching them a completely different set of skills (uncrewed system operations) and then having them try to retain both in a career...

Or take the Ukrainian approach and essentially create a new occupation - Uncrewed System Operator.

All analogies are suspect, that's why they are generally not very useful. Yours implies there is some sort of sovereign wall that should prevent outside intervention into the conflict. I alluded to the fact that the US proposal out in left field, but "US legitimacy" is not a factor, anymore...

Your house is occupied by a gangster who runs the show, and used the house to try and burn down the neighbourhood across the street. The analogy could be spun back over decades of grievances. Although Trump's proposal is right out in left field, I have to give the Administration credit for...

I think he will be remembered as one of the better elder Statesman in the US following his presidency as opposed to his actual term in office.