Maybe go for a full on light carrier like the  Cavour. Amphibious ooperations can be launched from a carrier, it just lacks the well deck for embarked landing craft.
NATO itself does have E-3s that they are planning to replace. The E-7 was the intended replacement.
https://awacs.nato.int/organisation/awacs-fleet-2
NATO countries that operate the E-7 such as UK and Turkey do so separate from NATO.
The "issues" are just Pete Hegseth being a moron and unilaterally canceling the order because he thinks satellites and carrier-borne E-2s are good enough. NATO wants to use the US economy of scale.
South Korea continues to operate the E-7, they're just buying a second platform.
And the E-7 is built on the 737, the most common aircraft in service. So parts are available at every airport in the world. The GlobalEye and Phoenix don't have that.
That's just a possibility at this point, not an actual feature. And the GlobalEye has all the radar systems in the way of where the fuel probes would go.
Nobody in the Republicans can whip up crowds quite like Trump. And remember, even Trump lost an election. They are almost certainly going to lose the midterms. The whole thing is Trump, once he's gone, it'll fizzle out.
The 22nd Amendment prohibits a third term. And it only happened a second time because he ran against a fantastically awful candidate.
Trump can't run in 2028, assuming he makes to 2028, and there's no real successor lined up. And who knows, he might be impeached a third time.
We already have Leopard 2s in Latvia, and found have it doesn't work like that. They have to send parts to the Canadian subsidiary, who releases them to the CAF.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.