• Thanks for stopping by. Logging in to a registered account will remove all generic ads. Please reach out with any questions or concerns.

Search results

  1. M

    CDN/US Covid-related political discussion

    I agree, it is shameful that successive Canadian governments of all political stripes have allowed our ability to domestically produce vaccines to wither and die. I'm no fan of this government, but other than single-handedly standing up a domestic production capability from virtually scratch...
  2. M

    CDN/US Covid-related political discussion

    I'll buy that. But that also means that a failure to adequately distribute the vaccine rests with the provinces.
  3. M

    Opportunity to update the CC-150 fleet?

    http://rcaf-arc.forces.gc.ca/en/article-template-standard.page?doc=cc-150-polaris-tanker-fleet-reaches-norad-milestone/kctml0p5 With the retirement of the Herc Hs looming, it looks like steps are being taken to ensure the RCAF can continue providing NORAD with a Canadian tanker capability.
  4. M

    Non-Commissioned Pilots in the RCAF Discussion

    Interesting - I'd heard that new guys at AC were being told 2 years to upgrade when they show up for their courses, but haven't heard if that's actually the reality, notwithstanding 2020. Yep, a friend of mine got the "welcome to WestJet" and "your 737 course is postponed indefinitely" calls...
  5. M

    Non-Commissioned Pilots in the RCAF Discussion

    Interesting.  Thanks.
  6. M

    Non-Commissioned Pilots in the RCAF Discussion

    Re post-covid recovery, no disagreement there. My response was more to dispel the notion that a military pilot could walk into any airline and be a Captain within 2 short years.  But, you are correct  that the upgrade at AC could be quick. Just out of curiosity, were any of your former...
  7. M

    Non-Commissioned Pilots in the RCAF Discussion

    But, back to the point of this thread - it's been an interesting discussion, but I think SSM has the most realistic solution.  A mix of financial incentives, career tracks (command vs technical), perhaps revisiting the requirement to have a degree.  Easier to accomplish than creating a new rank...
  8. M

    Non-Commissioned Pilots in the RCAF Discussion

    I see you edited that claim a bit.  Yes, the upgrade time was shorter at AC, mainly due to retirements and the acquisition of the 737 MAX (a lot of pilots with 737 experience were hired).  I would be surprised if any former RCAF pilots went from hired to Capt in 2 years. The wait at WJ is...
  9. M

    Non-Commissioned Pilots in the RCAF Discussion

    I'm sure that's accurate, so former military pilots may have an advantage, plus they are all IFR-rated.  But again, the jobs may not be desirable due to where they're based.
  10. M

    Non-Commissioned Pilots in the RCAF Discussion

    Just did quick search of helicopter companies.  Looks like anywhere from 600 to 1500 hours required.  I'm not sure what the average RW pilot would have in the logbook once they're in a position to make a career change,  but I don't think 1500+ is an unreasonable guess. A lot of northern "bush"...
  11. M

    Non-Commissioned Pilots in the RCAF Discussion

    Transport Canada does give credit to RCAF pilots who have qualified to wings standard, and the conversion is very straightforward. Converting an RCAF RW ticket to CPL (helicopter) is just as straightforward as the fixed wing side, plus any military fixed wing experience gained prior to Ph3...
  12. M

    Non-Commissioned Pilots in the RCAF Discussion

    For reference: (I assume these to be pre-covid numbers) Air Canada: Fleet 166 / 4500+ pilots WestJet: Fleet 125 / 1500+ pilots Jazz: Fleet 108 / 1500+ pilots Encore: Fleet 47 / 500+ pilots Porter: Fleet 29 / ~300 pilots Of the former RCAF pilots that I know, the vast majority have been...
  13. M

    The US Presidency 2020

    Agree!  Good debate, and it's definitely facilitated some learning on my part.  Researching and responding can really take up a lot of time though, even by current standards.
  14. M

    The US Presidency 2020

    Fully agree.  No need to write AG Barr, as it is clear that his reason does not include any indication that Mueller's team caused any delay. 
  15. M

    The US Presidency 2020

    I think you’re making a bit of a leap here.  Both Mueller and Barr acknowledge that the full report is still under review, both in Barr’s letter, and in Mueller’s response. Nowhere does Barr indicate that his decision to provide a summary to Congress is linked to any delay due to redactions...
  16. M

    The US Presidency 2020

    Barr explicitly states that his letter is a supplement to the notification he provided (as legally required) to Congress, that the Special Counsel investigation was complete. "Although my review is ongoing, I believe that it is in the public interest to describe the report and to summarize the...
  17. M

    The US Presidency 2020

    I guess there's not much point in debating if you're going to completely dismiss the fact the Mueller DID provide 6e redactions.  I suppose the fact that they were provided on 25 Mar (3 days late), may have caused whatever delay you keep referring to.  Perhaps the redacted report would have been...
  18. M

    The US Presidency 2020

    I'll read the article, thanks for the link. As a special counsel investigating Russian interference writ large, would it have been appropriate, or in the national interest, to curtail the investigation despite uncovering other crimes?
  19. M

    The US Presidency 2020

    Very easy.  How hard is it to understand that under federal law, there is no requirement to do so?  I can quote it again, if you'd like. How hard is it to understand that Mueller did in fact include 6e redactions on 25 Mar, as indicated in his letter, despite the fact that he had no legal...
  20. M

    The US Presidency 2020

    Nope.  Re-read your original accusation against Mueller.  How can the above be a complaint about a delayed report, when the SC staff is actively helping to review said report for release?  Attributing any delay to Mueller is patently false. Mueller is advocating the release of materials related...
Back
Top