Search results

Questioning the CDS why Canada is paying for a Ballistic Missile attack capability that has not been approved by parliament would be a painful experience

True and it would add a deep strike capability tube launched missiles do not provide .

Explaining to parliament buying stuff you won’t actually use might be a painful political experience .

Capability that can delivered from standard torpedo tubes. A dedicated VLS system is neither required or requested, it would simply duplicate the tube launched system

Hopefully they have factored this into their schedule I have zero marine engineering background but Grok says they have some serious work to do

Fast tracking this procurement is a very good move. It would be fun to be a fly on the wall in the two Proposal Rooms and for their Red Team proposal reviews If I was TKMS I would be seriously wondering how to sell a long delivery schedule to a customer in a hurry If I was HO, I would be...

👍👍

These boats will be extremely valuable assets. Any word if the RCN is looking at the USN model of two Gold/Blue crews to maximize patrol days?

Can the RCN train enough crews to synch with this delivery schedule? Can the RCN stand up an ILS infrastructure to synch with this delivery scheduke ?

That would be phenomenal . . . Any references on this technology? The Korean AIP is essentially the older German version that Korea adopted for their boats when they were building Type 214s under license from TKMS Now highly indigined with Korean suppliers

“If they want or demand special reasons to build them in Canada . . . “

It is hybrid boat with a dedicated Boomer capability the Koreans need for a retaliatory strike capability in case Kimmy goes off the rails Seriously? The commenly accepted definition of AIP is a system that produces electricity as differentiated from batteries that store/release electricity...

😂😂😂😂😂 Amusing

8 + years ago Budget cuts will do that As the CF well knows

Since TKMS totally updated their original yard and bought a 2nd construction facility, the production rate of Type 212 CD boats for Norway & Germany has ++ increased and they are ahead of schedule.

Both subs have LIB technology TKMS explicitly states they will meet the RCN delivery schedule

What’s your sales pitch for a boat with a design optimized for the Retaliation Strike Mission, that has an older generation AIP technology, is not optimized for stealth or cold water operations, has a VLS capability that is not required or even desired by the RCN, is built in yards with a...

If Korea proposes their Batch 3 boat, as speculated, they won’t make the delivery schedule either There is so little publicly available data about the tech specs and mission capabilities of the the two possible proposal boats it really is all about speculating at this time

Truth.