I'd say I am right and he is wrong, despite the fact he's a medical professional, for we are not talking about matters of science, we are talking about matters of definition. He says that pregnancy can go wrong, therefore it's automatically a condition. I say that is wrong, because pregnancy...
I remember when I was in high school roughly 30 years ago, LGBTQ (or however it's spelled) wasn't a thing at all. Today's kids have to deal with this radical gender nonsense, I feel bad for them.
You are exactly right, sir.
My humble opinion: we should pass laws that prohibit big money from buying news agencies, and reduce the influence by businesses who run ads on news papers/news programs. Capital has too much undue influence on this vital institution of our society. News should be charged with informing the...
Then you should know that pregnancy is only a condition when it's, well, abnormal. For the insurance company to treat his wife's pregnancy as a condition by default, they are in the wrong.
Funny you should say that, it wasn't me who started with the insults.
Btw, you called me stupid too when I didn't say anything like that to you at all.
What is your definition of "condition", sir?
Indeed I conflate them, and it's because I don't have a medical background. You sir on the other hand, felt the need to insult me for it because this exchange hurts your feelings.
It's existing, but it's not a condition.
Pregnancy is not an illness. For the insurance company to call it that, it just shows that they are a crass, money-grabbing business that is only concerned with profit.
Doesn't this apply to all assault cases, not just sexual ones?
For example, someone got beat up by someone else. Assuming that this took place in a private setting where there were no eye witnesses, the victim cannot produce any damning evidence.
This sounds like discrimination based one's health status. And it has actually happened to me. In my city, there is a Christmas market located downtown, every Christmas. I wanted to make some pocket money so I checked out their website, this was at least 2 years ago. And lo and behold, they...
If an employer fires someone because he refuses the jab, this is discrimination on one's health status. I know this isn't written in the law, however it is similar to other forms of discrimination in spirit.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.