Search results

Comes to mind that a bunch of happy post-short-contract types, both NCM and officer, would help with the whole "connecting the CAF with Canadians" thing. Dated archetype: a City type with a regimental tie, and regimental ties.

The video of that student activist being picked up by ICE a little while ago seemed ripe for that sort of response, too: a bunch of random guys surrounding someone on the street feels like exactly the sort of scenario a number of US firearms owners worry about and arm themselves to respond to.

The personality of the parties' offerings for PM is as much a part of the platform as X million to one project or another: what are you, party, intending to put in charge of the country, and in charge of implementing your grand platform? Do they seem at least vaguely intelligent and independent...

Which nation?

Might not even need to be something like that, especially if focused on the Army, with an acknowledged, planned-for trio of options at the end of the "be young, go hard, RIP your knees and spine" contract: select into a longer-term career path in the trade, remuster/CFR/otherwise radically...

Plus all the lower-level arming up and eyeballing the neighbours that comes with a less settled approach to borders.

peers at our southern neighbour

Although, when those duties likely include a line item about "maintaining good relations with the host nation and local community," mitigating a politician's gobbing off (VP, IIRC, isn't in the chain of command) and keeping a lid on your stupider troops seems worth doing.

Quick! Nab some more guns from the Russians!

Shifting the centre of gravity away from purple could be done without undue duplication. If the only places RCN/CA/RCAF pers in a given field bump into each other is at the school, maybe that field doesn't need to be a branch. Bung the common school under the VCDS, somewhere, maintain an...

Asking from a point of zero knowledge, what's the difference, and how has it been misconstrued? Swerving the topic... this seems like an argument for higher pay at an earlier career point: if Pte Bloggins needs to be operating at an elevated level from historical expectations (i.e., whenever...

Are the DC schools something that would benefit from doubled capacity anyways? Would it make sense to just build two new facilities adjacent to the current ones then give the current ones a real overhaul?

Yikes. Feels like an easy start for spending money on the Army. Had somehow missed that mod tentage was getting superseded...

That bad, eh? What's missing as far as equipment for current doctrine?

A more overt "this is a nucleus" approach might be helpful: allows singing the song of "more PYs plz" without having to be as deceptive about it. Looking at the thread title: building out the nine battalions to full strength, including the school staff, battalion-adjacent pers from range...

Isn't being able to operate in the same area as tanks also a major argument for tracked vehicles? Or is that less crucial with artillery than IFVs?

The square holes on the frame under the launcher, which also looks like it has corner blocks similar to a sea can.

Are those fork pockets on the frame under the turret? Would lifting that off gain enough headroom, or is the Hercules cutoff height somewhere much lower?

Does the AG usually get involved in directing sentencing goals? If not, it seems like the sort of decision that creates martyrs.

Not sure how much civilianization is desirable until the "moving" support units are fully staffed, their static peers are fully staffed, and both are arranged in such a way that the moving units can pick up and deploy without affecting support for whoever is left behind. Plus the entire CSS...