Search results

No. Trump is threatening a war against NATO. The instigation would be his decision to act on that threat. If we fool ourselves into thinking that we can sit it out and we choose to not respond with NATO, then we have not saved ourselves. We have simply made Trump’s first fight easier while...

I forget nothing. The claim was made that European NATO would be too cowardly to fight for itself. But European NATO has already demonstrated that it has the courage to fight when it is not threatened, so it would be foolish to assume away its willingness to fight when it is threatened. NATO...

I don’t know that enforcement needs to distinguish between supply vs demand in a criminal marketing chain so much as between who holds the power vs who is the weak, vulnerable, exploited, or otherwise victimized. Targeting people who are trapped in the cycle will see those people replaced by new...

Trump admin is now in the being trolled by NATO embassies stage.

Too little too late if they allow him to first attack NATO before they act.

NATO spilled a lot of its own blood to support the US in Afghanistan, and many even followed into Iraq. I don’t think I would assume away their willingness to fight when it will be in defence of themselves.

There have already been purges and resignations within military leadership. The administration has managed to execute a few major operations before the legislative branch knew anything. Neither legislative house has held Trump’s executive in check yet, and there is tabled legislation to...

It appears the White House Twitter is now making neo-nazi allusions within its Lebensraum threats. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/William_Gayley_Simpson

No.

Reasonable advice here.

The battalions already exist with their equipment. The intent for the next several years is individually deployable battalions, so we are there.

There is this: https://army.ca/forums/threads/defending-canadian-arctic-sovereignty.16198/

What makes security and force protection less deserving than other Operations Support functions that have established occupations?

This statement seems dismissive of all support occupations. I assume that is not your intent?

Maybe the first signs of TACO?

The new destroyers will need heightened security, and even CAF bases without fighters and destroyers should be doing more than happens now. There should be a CAF security force of personnel who are peace officers but not police officers for every major base.

Those hoping Congress will curb imperialist aggression might be in for some disappointment.

You are not really offering choice in a multifaith society when the choice is secular or one minority religion. If you want undiscriminating choice, then establish two competing secular systems. If you are not ready to do that, your real priority is not about offering everyone an equal choice...

Guess some countries have already implemented a ban. https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cg7y10xm4x2o

The reason behind the proposed X ban is getting news coverage. I don’t think one needs to have seen the images in the wold to know of them. https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2026/jan/09/musks-x-ordered-by-uk-government-to-tackle-wave-of-indecent-imagery-or-face-ban