i can see the ESA being a hard one to avoid if you are tying in maybe.
I think the others must get worked around. Do they even have the people to inspect the projects in the middle of nowhere?
interestingly ive seen both sides of this recently helping my kid out.
Buildings in non organized municipalities built without a permit both well and absolutely frighteningly bad
but also buildings built to the drawings, correctly and approved that often require much remedial work
It seems an incredibly risky plan to expect or rely on the Halifax class to carry on for another 8 years for the first of its replacements and 20 for the last. As well as maybe expensive?
I think the Canadian government thinks it can manage our own "frigate gap" much like the UK and RN and is willing to endure what may happen over the next 20 years as we replace the Halifax fleet
The SK, Chinese, Japanese can pump out ships pretty quick. Im somewhat confident that by the end of the RCD run we will have at least split the difference. The question is what happens after? We need the continuous build. If Irving could cut the build time in half would they just run out of work?
the UK is hoping to get construction down to 66 months eventually @Oldgateboatdriver guesstimate seems reasonable if not a little optimistic for first of class for us/Irving
previously I quoted a navylookout article where they state the weight margin is around 450 tonnes
we are less the 48 sea ceptors and 2 CIWS
but maybe no torpedoes or NSM on the type 26?
2 SeaRam in place of the 2 CIWS?
the Aussies have replaced 24 sea ceptors with an 8 cell Mk41
maybe we can do...
if we go MV-75 might be a case for a hi-low mix
MV-75 assembled in Montreal
H-175 assembled in Fort Erie
but we are already likely getting 60s to throw in the mix
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.