Who are we kidding? This Liberal party is practically a coalition, pretty soon it will be like a 1/3 conservatives if these floor crossings keep happening.
What I could dig up on coalition governments (google AI, take with a grain of doubt)
Yes, a coalition government can legally form in the Canadian Parliament, though it is extremely rare at the federal level. It requires two or more parties to agree to form a government together, sharing Cabinet...
The party is just as important as the person. Thats the reality. The Prime Minister comes from the party with the most seats. Yes there is good and bad in the system.
Saying people vote for the person not the party is incorrect. I would say it is subjective. Every voter makes their selection...
When a candidates name is on the sign with PARTY affiliation plus they are on the web site and recognized as a candidate, come on, FALSE ADVERTISING.
Your arguing semantics and going long ways to try and shape your argument.
I was less than impressed when Leona Allesev crossed to the conservatives, I put up a FB post at the time saying it made us look immoral and sneaky. So I stand by my standards then and I still do now. I was equally unimpressed when Jennica Atwin left the greens for the liberals, I have nothing...
I am going to get someone to pay for a load of beef, then when they come to pick it up, I will give them Lamb instead. I will say you choose me to be your farmer and in spite of what we agreed upon, I decided for you without discussion.
For all you closet Liberals, it is simple, you ran as...
Big surprise? Thats usually what happens in politics. When one party is in power, the other is usually unhappy or the least unsatisfied
Need another lesson in basic politics?
You realize nothing last forever? Like I said last night, enjoy the political buzz for now, I guarantee there is a hangover to come.
And stop pretending your non-partisan, your very pro Liberal, come out and admit it.
I think Mark Carney would do well if he can get on with DOAC podcast. Stephen is British-American, very well spoken and would definitely give him a fair shake. Joe would too but Joe will ask the tough and controversial questions.
It would increase the carney Juggernaut. Not sure he ever would...
And AGAIN, we have the microscope coming out for Pierre Poilievre and the blinders get put on for Carney.
I challenge you all to judge both leaders with similar standards. Deeds not words.
Thats your opinion. He has 2 MPs to get the briefings for him (one of them is mine Alex Ruff), and there is a limit to what they can tell him, but he hopefully gets enough to be able to act.
So you want the leader of the opposition to STFU? Ok, you don't like democracy much?
Your weakly...
Pierre is usually pretty accurate and on target with his numbers. I do plan to write my MP to confirm this, however Pierre usually has been spot on with his numbers. Lets get back to this one.
Did he use public funds or CPC funds?
Wait, Google AI, take with a grain of salt.
Office Expenses...
So again, I will bring something up. Especially since some here are very partisan and then pretend not to be. Hell, I am biased, I vote CPC and I am pro Pierre. I can live with it though if the party gives him the heave ho.
NOW, lets try doing something truly objective. Carney is 72 hours ish...
Even Liberals have dropped that line of attack. It had no teeth to it whatsoever, Long before the election when Tom Mulcair (Former NDP leader and former leader of the opposition) came out several times on CTV (generally a more balanced news agency than CBC), and explained why Pierre was smart...
Now, here I will share this. Mark Carney is the political hot item right now and this could really put him into a favourable position for the up coming three by elections. Nick Nanos has an interesting way of polling
As Warren Kinsella says "What does he do with it?"
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.