Search results

Yes, it was concerning lead vehicle. I should have been more clear. Thanks.

Why is this?

Now I'm just confused. Am I not supposed to use chain of command? Give orders to NCOs who pass them on to the NCMs? Unless giving a direct order to an NCM ("I need you to do this/go there").

It is beginning to make more sense now. I always figured you had to lead NCOs AND NCMs. Awesome stuff, guys.

Awesome, thanks.

So then how does an officer lead exactly, other than making decisions/giving orders in the field? That was a good post, gun runner, and is actually what I thought an officer was supposed to do: lead by example. As in, doing it yourself and making sure everyone does it as well.

Can you outline them?

Awesome, thanks.

Can someone explain this to me? I'm not quite sure I get it.

You can see the video on "today's big thing": http://www.todaysbigthing.com/2010/09/15 Very cool video.

They'll probably argue that they should be called the "Montreal Quebecois".  ::) And they wonder why we don't take them seriously.

You'll have to back this up. Though this is somewhat of a tangent since I'm sure abused women was not one of the primary reasons the French decided to ban burqas.

I don't understand. The reason you are making a public stir is because you disagree with it, vehemently. That is how you show others, and the government that you disagree with X. Displaying this is a form of protest and a form of "speech". As far as I know, burning my bible/koran/qur'an/flag...

The officer in question needed to have a reason to inconvenience a citizen. I doubt he would be stopping any mexicans (I'm not gonna sugar coat it) who were rolling around in honda civics or otherwise. Those who seemed like they were driving erraticlally, drove beaters and\or spoke little to no...

That's awesome. Thanks for posting this.

Supposedly, and I may be wrong about this, the preacher did not set anything on fire. However, certain individuals not related to said preacher did and it says on yahoo news that one of them was recently fired from his job. Hope that book burning was worth it.

This has been an ongoing process since the early 2000s. It's been going on for years. Check this out: http://Forums.Army.ca/forums/threads/87220.0.html As I posted then: The politicians who voted on this, and the people they represented, were extremely in favor for this. I do not see why...

http://edition.cnn.com/2010/WORLD/meast/09/09/iraq.candid.camera/?hpt=C1#fbid=3fE65ukDV_E&wom=true Funny to an extent, but I find it somewhat disrespectful.

It's also a great way to desensitize people towards children who might actually be on the street. "Probably another one of those damn paintings".

Agreed. I feel as though this is a form of entrapement. Fooling the driver into thinking there's a child on the road is a recipe for an accident. Someone will swerve and the result will be tragic.