Search results

Then all I can tell you is the CBI, if the mbr meets the criteria then there it is, to be handled in the same way as anything else in the military.

Not really sure what the issue is or what else you are looking for Ref's A & B spell it out pretty clearly to me. Ref C has nothing to do with PLD or TPLD. Ref A IS the actual regulation. Once again I could quote several passages to this effect which all answer your question. Restricted is...

Are they the same UIC?

Back dated promotion or not means nothing with regards to incentives, the effective date is all that matters. According to your last post I re-affirm that your incentive should kick in 30 May 08.  See your Orderly Room! Pilots often have their own criteria's in early DP's until he/she receives...

That is correct, CO's reported back these expected amounts of time to be spent the field annually. So if a unit did not report back accurately, then they can now see themselves being left out.

The message will eventually show up at the folllowing DIN link: http://hr.ottawa-hull.mil.ca/dgcb/dppd/allowance/engraph/allow_pol_e.asp?sidesection=3&sidecat=30

Sort of needs to have that "hull" design if it ever has to do water landings does it not? Also I do not think such a forward mounted gun would fair well after the bear trap hugs it to the deck, can you say "crunch"?

This is also further complicated by varying enrolment categories for officers of which the list is long. Read CBI 204.211 and see which article applies to you and work from there. There are also times for new officers where the incentive does not kick in automatically for a range of reasons and...

Whatever they do, stay away from San Miguel!!!! Exlax is nothing compared to that "beer"!!!

7 LGen's, or 9 "3 Stars" if you include the Navy's Vice-Admiral's. http://hr.dwan.dnd.ca/dsa/app_bio/engraph/FSeniorOfficerAddressBook_e.asp?mLimit=Gen&SectChoice=1

Seeing this discrepency within the first 2 para's makes me question the vailidity of the rest of the article.

Yes

It is in black and white, CFTDTI's 7.10(3) is one reference and I am sure if i were to look at the TB travel Policy I would find something very similar within Module 3. Ultimately it remains at the Approving Authorities (CO's) discretion.

I can only assume you actually searched CANFORGEN's as you reference it in your post. However, it was not a CANFORGEN but rather a DCBA message amending CFTDTI's. Specifically DCBA 3 003/08 0104021404Z APR 08 para 2.B. which is applicable to Modes Of Transportation only (e.g: Taxi, Suttle...

Have her check her facts, have her quote the applicable policy article which substantiates her facts and provide it to you in writing, if it still stands challenge her interpretation through her supervisor, and if it still stands then query through your chain of command and the IRP Military...

TCBF, I do not see your concerns surrounding LDA to be any different then the Navy with SDA. You want the allowance you must be posted to a unit which goes to sea, or that goes to the field. BTW: there is no such thing as a "High LDA Unit", either a unit is designated to receive or its not. The...

CODEDS = Continuous Deductions thus yes your PMQ (coudl also be SQ's for anyone else) The information you provide above is repeat of the "F6" screen within CCPS and as such does provide a good visual. According to the info you provided above yes your pays should be 1995.81/2. You state you only...

Uhm, just fore go your particulars and then its anonymous. And I'll warn you right now that without looking at the documents themselves and your pay via CCPS it can be very difficult to provide viable feedback through these means.

They didn't, points will be interchangeable between all listed environmental allowances. As for you other questions, I haven't seen anything mentioned directly pertaining to RSS. Everybody will want answers right away but until further clarification is provided it is a presumption game. But the...

That's my guess as well, however after reading the CBI it does not state this. It refers you to CBI 205.015 para's 3 and 4, of which neither detail how you "earn" a point. I fear that the point "crossover" and retro-activeness is going be a headache on clerks for years to come. Even more so...