Search results

It's not an occupation per se, research the DIN and you will find information about it as an out of trade assignement for a fix tour duration. Mind expanding of the similarities between Flight Attendant and Clerk are?

Agreed, but my point was/is that not all pers are with LFCA or a Cbt Arm. As 2fly has stated, every unit may do things slightly differently as well as various command levels through internal directives meant to amplify on CFAO's, CBI's etc. Rather perhaps an elaboration by folks in those...

In this case the initial poster never stated he was in the Cbt Arms or if he was with NavRes or ARF, thus making this assumption misguiding. Perhaps Cbt Arms have Unit Boards, but that does not mean the rest of the CF do and care should be taken to not lump every one in one small entity of the CF.

You do realise that the brief in question is 2 years old and that changes have likely occured to the project since then?

LFCO's are not CF policies nor does CLS establish these. Rather they (LFCO's) are intended to further interpret CF policy and as such if CDA changes the PLAR criterion's then LFCO's will have to be amended accordingly. Undoubtedly LFDTS would liaise with CDA on all CLS issues, however just...

As stated in my original post, that is the information I received from CFRG pertaining to CDA's amendment of PLAR's. Those with PLQ would only be required to attend an "Officership Colloquium", which I have been told some already did last year.

To add to Springroll's posts:

I guess I should of been more specific, obviously not Cbt Arms. Rather was intended to denote any other Army centric occupation such as EO Techs, Veh Techs, ED Techs, etc etc

As alluded by Vern and emphasized by dapaterson, this allowance will be administered in line as other enviromental allowances, which has also been explained in other threads. The key phrasing at this point is that a unit must expect "to be in the field for at least 60 days in a year to receive"...

Messages satrted coming out last week.

You've got to be kidding me!? Ever thought of asking your supervisor/CoC, Orderly Room, peers, roommate, buddy, friends, looking at the walls in the quarters, looking in Routine Orders, asking at Canex, Yellow Pages etc etc. Next someone will be asked to spoon feed, sheesh. ::)

You mean the Panther?

Here is link to video and transcript: http://www.cbc.ca/national/blog/video/rex_murphy/a_salute_to_the_general_1.html Also from my perspective, it was not just what he embodied, such as humility, genuine and passionate. But also what he didn't. He isn't/was not arrogant, sanctimonious or...

Point to have clarified by staff currently at PRETC. Last brief/O-Group I received stated that by June 08 "Army PATS" would no longer be posted to PRETC, that CLS TE's would manage them. This seems to be along the same lines as the CAS PAT's who are managed by CFSATE as you have stated. This...

This same rumour has been around for decades, and once in a while an official statement comes out to that effect. The last I recall seeing was a few years ago, but in either case and as stated by others above they are not submissible deductions. And while we are on this, Mess Dues are also not...

I am also hoping for GSP, but Serra's ground game is considered to be amongst the very best in MMA. I am with Eye In The Sky on this one, Serra is not likely to try to stand with GSP.

That's called entertainement!  ;D Provided it is in garrison of course and not on operation.

Address this through the CoC as that answer in quite unacceptable. DND contracted the carriers service and as such must address these issues as well. Rather it sounds to me as though both the Carrier and F&E are trying to ignore the issue rather then addressing it.

Nothing wrong with it other then a "0" is not shown, ARTYMN should of read 021. For all the NCM MOC's with only 2 numbers add a 0 at the beginning of them.

Once you are sworn in you are part of the CF.