• Thanks for stopping by. Logging in to a registered account will remove all generic ads. Please reach out with any questions or concerns.

Search results

  1. Fabius

    Informing the Army’s Future Structure - CAMO Discussion

    Ex OAK RESOLVE is a BG level exercise. It’s also a multi national BG so even though it’s got a large significant Cdn component it’s still not a Cdn unit. It’s also not a CA exercise but rather a CJOC/Task Force Latvia exercise. There is another exercise series Ex RESOLUTE WARRIOR and Ex...
  2. Fabius

    Informing the Army’s Future Structure - CAMO Discussion

    I am not certain it can. Certainly not in the near term. However it can likely do multiple single unit Bn level force on forces. Smaller individual footprints for each iteration. Fewer key support trades needed etc. Smaller OPFOR requirements. I think the force currently would benefit more...
  3. Fabius

    Informing the Army’s Future Structure - CAMO Discussion

    I think large elements of our field force would likely agree. However, if that was the case why have all the sizable Army's amongst NATO and the 5 Eyes decided otherwise? Planning training and organizing it coherently but transparently so that the Blue force is forced into certain situations...
  4. Fabius

    Informing the Army’s Future Structure - CAMO Discussion

    While Canada does indeed have a Combat Training Centre and in the CA that is understood to equal Gagetown and individual training, the use of Combat Training Centre is not USA language, its a term that is familiar to NATO and the 5 Eyes. Examples: Australia Army uses the term Combat Training...
  5. Fabius

    Informing the Army’s Future Structure - CAMO Discussion

    For the CA, I am thinking that the Force on Force Trg against an OPFOR should be at the Bn/Bde level. I would suggest in order to generate enough repetition to actually generate learning across the field force the CA should be aiming at multiple Bn force on forces a year. I agree on the OPFOR...
  6. Fabius

    Informing the Army’s Future Structure - CAMO Discussion

    The CA still needs some sort of CTC to conduct the collective training piece for the field force. I am not convinced that the field force can properly challenge itself if it’s left to do collective training (CT)by itself. As is the Army has largely outsourced all CT to either JRTC and JPMRC or...
  7. Fabius

    Informing the Army’s Future Structure - CAMO Discussion

    In relation to the US Army transformation in contact and some of the other NATO army’s experimentation Bns, should the CA have a designated experimentation Bn? This would not be the same as the Canadian Army Trials and Evaluation Unit. CATEU seems focused on equipment technical parameters...
  8. Fabius

    Chest Rig preference

    The CA’s current $100 million dollar project to purchase new dual NVGs was just recently amended to reflect an intensifier tube spec that will eliminate all but US manufacturers. Apparently the various Euro companies were less than thrilled by the last minute changes to the RFP despite the...
  9. Fabius

    Canadian Dismounted Infantry Capability Enhancement (DICE) programme

    Are you being allowed to run it with plates in it and no frag vest, or is it the frag vest with the PC over top?
  10. Fabius

    Canadian Dismounted Infantry Capability Enhancement (DICE) programme

    I am not tracking any current active hearing protection having integrated ballistic protection. Honestly I would not worry about that, I would focus on getting every DICE helmet issued equipped with currently existing COTS active hearing protection. Notice how no one in the CA video on...
  11. Fabius

    Canadian Dismounted Infantry Capability Enhancement (DICE) programme

    Some video of the vests etc. here https://www.facebook.com/share/r/1GEiLqmRWb/?mibextid=wwXIfr
  12. Fabius

    Informing the Army’s Future Structure - CAMO Discussion

    The other item that’s interesting in this developing structure is that the 3 CMBGs are grouped as a single war fighting division with intentions to create the fires, protection and sustainment Bdes along with the Div HQ to make it a war fighting Div. Interestingly the reserves don’t seem to...
  13. Fabius

    Informing the Army’s Future Structure - CAMO Discussion

    That is very true. That sets the stage for everything. It’s a hard slog to destroy the hold symmetry has on the CA.
  14. Fabius

    Government hints at boosting Canada’s military spending

    I thought medical transport is the movement of patients between medical facilities. Intra hospital transfers, usually done by Ambulance civi side. The patient is usually stable and has already undergone treatment. Perhaps MEDEVAC is still prior to surgical intervention?
  15. Fabius

    Informing the Army’s Future Structure - CAMO Discussion

    At first glance I thought it was good, and it has potential. However I too think it should aim at the Bde level. That’s were I start wondering about the overall theme of keeping all 3 CMBGs and their respective Engr, Arty, Svc Bn, HQ and Sigs and Fd Amb units as Mechanized units. All while...
  16. Fabius

    Informing the Army’s Future Structure - CAMO Discussion

    I am curious what people think of this concept that I saw this month. 1. Remove the Light Bns from each of the 3 CMBGs. 2. Form a new Light Infantry Regiment (LIR) with the 3 Light Bns (No Cap Badge changes) 3. This LIR would have a LIR HQ and the 3 Bns. The HQ is more of a force generation...
  17. Fabius

    Canadian River Class Destroyer Megathread

    Just a thought but just because a ship is designed doesn’t mean it has to be built immediately or perhaps at all. A CDC vessel, a sub tender, a hospital ship, a C2 ship like the Blue Ridge Class, maybe a militarized AOP 😂, pick 2-3 and get the designers working. Keeps the skills alive and the...
  18. Fabius

    Liberal (Minority/Majority) Government 2025 - ???

    Ultimately the LPC for the last 12 years has been molded by Trudeau in favour of his aims and objectives. Despite Carney now being in charge the LPC MPs and personnel behind them are all still largely from the Trudeau era. That’s not a surprise and it’s unreasonable to expect much else, however...
  19. Fabius

    Canadian River Class Destroyer Megathread

    As per the Seaspan CEO the design work for everything the GoC has ordered is largely done and winding down. It’s got nothing to do with how many ships are left to be built to the existing designs. Due to cost of maintaining the large and highly capable design staff that they have built from...
  20. Fabius

    CH-148 Cyclone Progress

    Eryx was never replaced though. It was just allowed to fade away.
Back
Top