Search results

When looking for a question to fit your answer, somethings are not even worth a fit test. Trump’s assault in Canada/US relations is not something you are going to solve with a modified CA orbat … regardless of its elegance. And in this case you are proposing we created a new division HQ (for...

Don’t we have a whole thread discussing the current US administration’s caustic behaviours toward Canada where the last two and a quarter pages would better fit?

This would do absolutely nothing for Canada. Doesn’t fit any national strategy. Doesn’t earn “international relations points” with a president who doesn’t care about allies. Doesn’t support our commitments to NATO. Doesn’t please voters who will see it as an act of servitude.

Whatever he wants to do next, I hope someone has the plan so that it comes to a positive end-state.

With his northern imperial ambitions seemingly deterred by NATO and the stock market, he turns his interest back south … seemingly unconcerned about how his base will react to adding 30 million Spanish speakers to the national population.

So, does this mean cease fire is over?

Yes, the case can be made that the military does not require a professional disciplinary system and an employer disciplinary system because there is only one employer. A professional disciplinary system is done in public whereas employer disciplinary systems are typically done behind closed...

The half of medium cavalry that is not being employed as MBTs in a mech brigade will be more like a battlegroup than a brigade.

Except, half of Canada's medium cavalry will usually be employed as interchangeable with MBTs.

That's not what we are discussing.

Yes, we are talking about professional discipline and not professional licensing. But professional discipline is also different from employer discipline. An employer can discipline its professionals for things that the professional body does not discipline, and the professional body can...

Simulators.

A professional disciplinary system, unlike an employer’s HR processes, communicates (to the members and to the public) what behaviours the profession finds unacceptable. If the CAF wants there to be a profession of arms, then there needs to be a professional disciplinary system that does more...

Professional disciplinary process are unlike employer systems because the results are public - the accusations, decisions, and punishments all get published. We don’t need more teeth for our administrative processes (they are actually fine). We need a professional disciplinary system that is...

At one time, most households could do the maintenance on their own car. It’s like technology has changed.

Parallel systems already exist without eroding charter protections. Doctors, lawyers, teachers, engineers all do this already. There is no obligation under the NDA for a CAF member to make representations during an administrative process nor during a disciplinary process. Many professional...

Anyone hoping to see the end of the Snowbirds may be disappointed.

Which system (professional disciplinary or criminal) did more to ensure justice and a fair outcome in this case: https://www.ctvnews.ca/kitchener/article/jeffrey-sloka-former-neurologist-acquitted-on-sexual-assault-charges-cant-practice-medicine/

There are ways to get back in the forces after being kicked out too. Have a functioning professional disciplinary system is fair, and a CAF member ejected from the forces under such a system would not have been disproportionately treated as compared to a civilian professional who has a license...