Search results

Interesting to note, based on her public appearances. Its been determined the premieres speech was prerecorded on wednesday. Which further added fuel to the fire that the committee etc was all just for show and this was all a pre planned outcome.

Only creative accounting is by the critics imo, NATO definitions of defense spending havent changed, and the GoC moving the CG under dnd for example doesnt change that. They rely on public ignorance thinking NATO just looks at the over all dollar, and doesnt dig deeper, which they do.

One point seems lost on some people that we are seeing the largest surge in recruitment in decades, suddenly recovery of kit from those who aren't entitled is more urgent. We are also in the transition phase to new personal kit, which makes it more difficult to get what we need until deliveries...

Coming soon at CANSEC, the future of tank transporting

Sure is clear as mud aint it?

Ill give rare credit to Smith for this, masterful thread of the needle to prevent an actual separation referendum until 2028 at the earliest

Well lets see if they remove her now like they threatened

She wouldn't be doing this if she was a federalist. This twists even forever canada into word salad. QC you continue to assert She is a federalist, a federalist wouldnt be standing up for seperatists in court, if this was Qc you'd be appauled

No, but each regiment would have the flexibility of including all parts of NTac from recce/firesupport to heavy lift

how ever it sets the stage for an interesting head to head of a provincial arm of a party being pro separation, with the federal party being against it. Depending on Smith's Next move, the federal conservatives may cut ties with the UCP

and we wouldn't have it any other way....cause CAF

Administratively the brigade will still belong to the RCAF, tactically they will be under army command. So PY is more a RCAF issue, as will be the budget

Pierre Poilievre finally makes the CPC position explicitly clear, they will campaign against separation in the event of a referendum https://www.ctvnews.ca/politics/article/poilievre-says-all-conservatives-will-campaign-for-alberta-to-stay-part-of-canada/

Because the priority is operational crew training not having people ready for airshows so you wont start doing stuff like this until the fleet is at FoC

10x is connected to the current US ambassador to canada and the Michigan GOP. It was widely used by the GOP in swing states during the last presidential election. Article states atleast 150 people are "claimed" in their database

If you look up the old post Afghanistan senate defense committee report and its recommendations for our helicopter fleets, thats pretty much the way things are going

Although the arguement can be made some projects are nation building when they have duel use. Example shipyards, ports

You do read correctly a full aviation brigade, ive seen detailed break downs of it, and the need for this brigade is really driving NTac discussions

Carney and the environment minister can and the stroke of a pen issue exemptions to the tanker ban. No vote in parliment needed, no law changes needed, they can just do it. They can then get around the province by doing a federal environmental review to by pass the province via the one review...

If you have access to DWAN, DLRs page has the power point explaining the numbers game. It and other projects are no longer being viewed as maintaining a capability but actual war fighting with high losses. That was a lesson from ukraine we need deep war stocks