Search results

when it looks like it impacts an election

cant say never met the man and honestly im not tuned in enough to the political relationships and machinations going on to know I question what was wrong with the policies and whether any alternatives will work

well its possible he was a bad choice as a Minister based on his past but the history of civil disobedience just speaks to the passion and conviction he had for the ideas. Not a negative IMO If his religious belief is that AGW is really, really bad that is just based on good science Balancing...

most of these individuals dont attract much attention in scientific circles because they are just bad at the science interestingly Spencer is having it out with Pat Frank right now on his insane ideas, showing that within the small group of skeptics there is no agreement on an alternative...

these just seem like policy disagreements to me, not something to attract too much vitriol over to me

Not yet ask me in November lol But is that the issue that he got arrested?

I can certainly envision the circumstances where they fail but i doubt its a cold problem alone. Every mine in the arctic is using electric motors outside year round just like everywhere else in the world.

i think it would be the opposite. electric motors are extremely robust.

UTV is Canadian though so maybe that gives it the edge?

Is there description of his faults somewhere? Im curious how many things i would differ with him on

the three contenders?

a couple more photos

the science is what it is. https://www.ipcc.ch/report/ar6/syr/ Personal beliefs and or statements by any sort of social or political elites are irrelevant. While it would be nice to see real leadership on that, It would honestly be somewhat surprising If anything the conservative nature of...

What cycle? Milankovitch cycles are for cooling not heating 430ppm CO2 represents 17m +/- sea level rise and CO2eq is actually 560 and thus represents an even higher sea level rise, meanwhile we are not at net zero yet thus the ppm have not stabilised and therfore 17m doesnt represent the...

correct

I dont remember anyone talking about RCP/SSP 8.5 in that manner. Whats funny is that the new high emissions scenario crosses 8.5 only 20 years later

theory is the highest standard of explanation in science, a well substantiated explanation of the natural world based on a large body of repeatedly confirmed facts, observations, and experiments.

RCP/SSP 8.5 was just a high emissions scenario, its been pretty much disregarded for the last 10 yrs or so as we havent followed that emissions pathway and no one ever thought we were going to

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ROKS_Daejeon_(FFG-823) tell them to they can leave the frigate too

I presume behind the scenes there a clearer picture of intent. Are we not buying lots of American gear? HIMARS etc cant be over a few Globaleyes vs E7s